cjc2
Loc: Hellertown PA
I have had many cameras over my 50+ year career, but not one that died. I have replaced a couple of shutters, which is absolutely no issue. We'll see how my current mirrorless do, but, so far so good, @ 50k images from each of my two Nikon Z9s so far. Best of luck.
User ID wrote:
Guess Im the first. My Nex-6 throws an error message after every shot requiring a power off and back on. Reloading with latest FW didn't help.
I believe that qualifies as dead.
Not dead; just in need of a visit to the doctor.
Only once. In the early 2000s, I had a Casio EX-S2 (2mp) that I carried everywhere - it fit in a shirt pocket. I have a couple of fine 12x16 prints from that camera on our walls. It came up with some kind of error message that I couldn’t rectify so I abandoned it for my less convenient “serious” camera = Nikon D50.
My photography goes back to the 60s and my first pro-grade camera was a Nikon F. Physical life is not the determinant of replacement; technology advancements are.
Had one die. Nikon F had to have its shutter replaced. Now the second shutter won’t release unless I push the release a second time. Now, can’t find the right parts, so it sits. But it served me well for decades and still functions, after a fashion. Have to use a hand held meter with it though because of lack of available batteries that are worth buying. All the lenses I purchased for it work fine and do so on a Df body.
AntonioReyna wrote:
I have been shooting for over 50 years, film and digital, and have shot with many camera brands. I have never had a shutter issue, but Hoggs are continuously worried about shutter counts nevertheless.
These days, when mechanical shutters can operate at 12 frames per second, shutter life has become more important.
I have photographed soccer games and basketball games where the shutter count has ranged from 500 to 1,000.
I must admit that I only got a few great images at those games. Considering that I have nine grandchildren, that could be a lot of games and very high shutter counts.
Ava'sPapa wrote:
I've noticed some folks say that they only replace their cameras when they die, which got me to thinking...I've never had a camera die. How about YOU? How many of you have replaced a camera because it died, and out of curiosity, what brand was it? Got tired of it maybe...or wanted IBIS or better focusing...better battery life...but DIE ? How about shutter life? We make a big deal of shutter life (I realize that It's important) when purchasing a camera, but how many of you got to the point where your shutter died? Did you replace it or get a new camera? Just curious here.
I've noticed some folks say that they only replace... (
show quote)
Maybe my situation is a lot different, but I've worn out a Nikon FM body and a Nikon F3 shutter in my day. The FM was thrown in the recycling bin for electronics, while the F3 shutter was replaced, the mirror replaced and realigned, and it kept going until my employer sold it to a coworker.
I worked for a school portrait company. We used Canon EOS 5D, 20D, 30D, 40D, 50D, and 5D II bodies with Tamron 28-75mm zooms. We started with 320 EOS 20D bodies. Five years later, we were beginning to see shutter failures at around 65,000 clicks. Those bodies were unofficially rated at 50,000 clicks, while the 30D, 40D, and 50D bodies were rated at 100,000. In our business, the average camera saw 1200 clicks a week for 8 weeks in the fall, and about 1000 clicks a week for four weeks in the spring. We saw a handful of 20D failures in year four, and a larger handful each year after, until we were sold to a larger company. Some of the 20D bodies logged well over 100,000 clicks.
My philosophy of camera replacement is to replace when I need, want, and can afford to do so. I've bought as I needed, what I wanted, when I could justify the expense. It's not what I have, it's how I use it that counts!
I know a guy with 22 lenses and three bodies, and last I checked, he never goes out with more than two bodies and three lenses, because they're too big and heavy! He mostly covers high school sports for his grandson's yearbook advisor. So he doesn't NEED more than two bodies and three lenses most of the time. Some of his lenses are still in the original boxes...
I’ve only bought new cameras because I want a new camera. I did have one die though, my Panasonic G9 that took a swim from a flipped kayak. Luckily I’d bought the drop/spill warranty because I bought the camera for kayaking. They replaced it with a brand new G9 which I immediately sold because in the meantime I switched to Olympus for the better AF.
burkphoto wrote:
Maybe my situation is a lot different, but I've worn out a Nikon FM body and a Nikon F3 shutter in my day. The FM was thrown in the recycling bin for electronics, while the F3 shutter was replaced, the mirror replaced and realigned, and it kept going until my employer sold it to a coworker.
I worked for a school portrait company. We used Canon EOS 5D, 20D, 30D, 40D, 50D, and 5D II bodies with Tamron 28-75mm zooms. We started with 320 EOS 20D bodies. Five years later, we were beginning to see shutter failures at around 65,000 clicks. Those bodies were unofficially rated at 50,000 clicks, while the 30D, 40D, and 50D bodies were rated at 100,000. In our business, the average camera saw 1200 clicks a week for 8 weeks in the fall, and about 1000 clicks a week for four weeks in the spring. We saw a handful of 20D failures in year four, and a larger handful each year after, until we were sold to a larger company. Some of the 20D bodies logged well over 100,000 clicks.
My philosophy of camera replacement is to replace when I need, want, and can afford to do so. I've bought as I needed, what I wanted, when I could justify the expense. It's not what I have, it's how I use it that counts!
I know a guy with 22 lenses and three bodies, and last I checked, he never goes out with more than two bodies and three lenses, because they're too big and heavy! He mostly covers high school sports for his grandson's yearbook advisor. So he doesn't NEED more than two bodies and three lenses most of the time. Some of his lenses are still in the original boxes...
Maybe my situation is a lot different, but I've wo... (
show quote)
Some shoot, some collect ...
Peteso wrote:
My photography goes back to the 60s and my first pro-grade camera was a Nikon F. Physical life is not the determinant of replacement; technology advancements are.
That's pretty much what I'm alluding to.
CHG_CANON wrote:
Some shoot, some collect ...
Yep. My "collection" is OLD stuff I really should get rid of, as it is of no value to me.
AntonioReyna wrote:
I have been shooting for over 50 years, film and digital, and have shot with many camera brands. I have never had a shutter issue, but Hoggs are continuously worried about shutter counts nevertheless.
To me, high shutter count on a premium camera is a badge of honor, pretty much like a high mileage reading on a premium automobile. You expect the good ones to be used and to last forever.
I have had two Pentax K50 cameras that developed the aperture block problem which severely crippled their usage.
I have cameras from WWII....still working....never had this happen to even my newer ones,either.....?
Fredrick
Loc: Former NYC, now San Francisco Bay Area
Since 1971 I’ve had multiple film SLR’s, digital point and shoots, and multiple mirrorless cameras, and never had a technical issue on any of them.
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.