chikid68 wrote:
I have noticed (around here at least) the trend of photographers is to favor Nikon cameras over Canon or other brands.
The irony is that they are not even using the top models but rather a basic cropped sensor model.
Is this an indication of better quality or just minimal budget.
Twelve or so years ago, I volunteered at our local arboretum. I was in positions where I interacted with our visitors both formally and informally. At that time, there was a very clear trend...those who came to the arboretum to photograph people used Canon cameras, and those who came to photograph flowers used Nikon.
Four or so years ago, I participated in a couple of night sky photography workshops during two consecutive summers. Nikon cameras were more prevalent than Canon at both workshops, and the Canon users had more problems getting good results.
Lately I see females almost exclusively with Canons, and males predominately with Nikons.
I believe that Nikon has made some strategic decision errors over the past 12 or 15 years that has hurt them quite a bit compared to other manufacturers. These decisions have impacted their place in the market. (I worked for many years for a semiconductor company that made a bunch of similar bonehead decisions.) Two of those that were most obvious to me were
--Leaving the DX "prosumer" spot vacant for several years between the discontinuance of the D300s and the introduction of the D500. (And no...the D90 did not fill that gap. I have one, converted to IR. In no way does the D90 fill the role that a D400 or whatever would have filled. Its operation is nothing like operation of the D300/300s or D500)
--Having a serious discontinuity between the operating interface of the beginner and consumer cameras (especially D3xxx and D5xxx) and the operating interface of cameras higher in the hierarchy. There has been no meaningful progression path within the consumer line, and no natural transition from the consumer line to the more capable models.
Strategic blunders are surprisingly common among very technically competent companies. Sometimes they are recoverable, sometimes not. It will be interesting to see what happens in Nikon's case, because it is not yet obvious to me that they understand what the real problem actually is. I see them working pretty hard and even raising a pretty good-sized cloud of dust. I don't see them understanding the issue. The key is to stop making those knee-jerk decisions that cause more self-injury than correction. It's like our local transit agency...when ridership drops a little, their canned response is to cut service. And when they do that, ridership drops even more as previous customers seek other options to reliably get to work or wherever they need to go.
Fortunately, I have everything I need to do whatever photography I want to do. If stuff wears out or breaks, I'll either find another way or find a different subject to photograph. That lets me watch the game objectively, without having to stress over what happens.