Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
Question for hoggers
Page <prev 2 of 14 next> last>>
Dec 21, 2022 10:05:44   #
Bill 45
 
[quote=joer]
CHG_CANON wrote:
LOL - the market, rather than UHH, says people prefer Canon digital cameras at a rate of 4.7 Canons to every 2.2 Sony to 1.8 Nikon.
lessYou are quite right and given a few exceptions it is an indication marketing has targeted the appropriate user.

Chevy outsells BMW.

Chevy cost less than BMW, if BMW was the price as a Chevy. Chevy would be history.

Reply
Dec 21, 2022 10:07:33   #
chikid68 Loc: Tennesse USA
 
Mac wrote:
I haven’t noticed that trend, though brand and/or model isn’t important to me so it may be that I just don’t register it.


I've noticed it because since I portray Santa Claus in a variety of settings and most venues book a photographer I work with several ones through the season and most of the time it's a consumer grade Nikon pointed at me.
Although I always bring my Sony with an adapted Canon 24-70 f2.8 lens for my own portfolio shots before the children arrive.

Reply
Dec 21, 2022 11:09:36   #
PGJR Loc: 33868
 
I shoot with Nikons because that's the brand I started with 45 years ago. I spent 3 weeks in AZ, CA & Ne & I saw only one person using a DSLR all the others were using their phones.

Reply
 
 
Dec 21, 2022 11:12:59   #
John Maher Loc: Northern Virginia
 
chikid68 wrote:
I have noticed (around here at least) the trend of photographers is to favor Nikon cameras over Canon or other brands.
The irony is that they are not even using the top models but rather a basic cropped sensor model.
Is this an indication of better quality or just minimal budget.


I suspect that UHH membership ranges from brand-new novices to top-of-the-line experts. Most of us are probably amateurs and we also span a broad range. I believe most have joined to learn and issues are not always limited by the brand or model they cite. It is difficult to understand why some experts would participate other than to share that knowledge. During the COVID lockdown, my brick-and-mortar camera store hosted free zoom sessions with experts from various manufacturers. I attended all brands and these company spoke-persons usually identified equivalent terms from other brands.

While some, especially pros, can afford the latest and greatest, I suspect most of us are striving for and achieving above average results using equipment based on personal needs and cost priorities. I do remember one pro still used a camera several generations old because he knew it so well and it satisfied all his needs -- even had it refurbished rather than upgrade.

The more I learn, the less I know.

Reply
Dec 21, 2022 11:20:29   #
R.G. Loc: Scotland
 
If you check out performance figures on sites like DXOmark, Nikon and Sony run roughly neck-and-neck while Canon, Fujifilm, Olympus and Panasonic are less of a presence. However, with Nikon you get Sony levels of performance at a cheaper price point and with better ergonomics and simpler, more user-friendly menu systems. Sony sometimes wins out when it comes to bells and whistles but they're roughly equal when it comes to basic capabilities.

Reply
Dec 21, 2022 12:16:05   #
larryepage Loc: North Texas area
 
chikid68 wrote:
I have noticed (around here at least) the trend of photographers is to favor Nikon cameras over Canon or other brands.
The irony is that they are not even using the top models but rather a basic cropped sensor model.
Is this an indication of better quality or just minimal budget.


Twelve or so years ago, I volunteered at our local arboretum. I was in positions where I interacted with our visitors both formally and informally. At that time, there was a very clear trend...those who came to the arboretum to photograph people used Canon cameras, and those who came to photograph flowers used Nikon.

Four or so years ago, I participated in a couple of night sky photography workshops during two consecutive summers. Nikon cameras were more prevalent than Canon at both workshops, and the Canon users had more problems getting good results.

Lately I see females almost exclusively with Canons, and males predominately with Nikons.

I believe that Nikon has made some strategic decision errors over the past 12 or 15 years that has hurt them quite a bit compared to other manufacturers. These decisions have impacted their place in the market. (I worked for many years for a semiconductor company that made a bunch of similar bonehead decisions.) Two of those that were most obvious to me were

--Leaving the DX "prosumer" spot vacant for several years between the discontinuance of the D300s and the introduction of the D500. (And no...the D90 did not fill that gap. I have one, converted to IR. In no way does the D90 fill the role that a D400 or whatever would have filled. Its operation is nothing like operation of the D300/300s or D500)
--Having a serious discontinuity between the operating interface of the beginner and consumer cameras (especially D3xxx and D5xxx) and the operating interface of cameras higher in the hierarchy. There has been no meaningful progression path within the consumer line, and no natural transition from the consumer line to the more capable models.

Strategic blunders are surprisingly common among very technically competent companies. Sometimes they are recoverable, sometimes not. It will be interesting to see what happens in Nikon's case, because it is not yet obvious to me that they understand what the real problem actually is. I see them working pretty hard and even raising a pretty good-sized cloud of dust. I don't see them understanding the issue. The key is to stop making those knee-jerk decisions that cause more self-injury than correction. It's like our local transit agency...when ridership drops a little, their canned response is to cut service. And when they do that, ridership drops even more as previous customers seek other options to reliably get to work or wherever they need to go.

Fortunately, I have everything I need to do whatever photography I want to do. If stuff wears out or breaks, I'll either find another way or find a different subject to photograph. That lets me watch the game objectively, without having to stress over what happens.

Reply
Dec 21, 2022 12:51:56   #
Architect1776 Loc: In my mind
 
R.G. wrote:
If you check out performance figures on sites like DXOmark, Nikon and Sony run roughly neck-and-neck while Canon, Fujifilm, Olympus and Panasonic are less of a presence. However, with Nikon you get Sony levels of performance at a cheaper price point and with better ergonomics and simpler, more user-friendly menu systems. Sony sometimes wins out when it comes to bells and whistles but they're roughly equal when it comes to basic capabilities.


DXO is a subsidiary of Sony/Nikon.
They base their reports on purely subjective parameters.
PS Canon far outsells Sony and Nikon. So why is it the by far preferred camera system if it is so crappy?
Also lens rentals put out the most lenses and cameras rented and again Canon was far ahead and Nikon was virtually not even represented.

Reply
 
 
Dec 21, 2022 14:44:51   #
rmorrison1116 Loc: Near Valley Forge, Pennsylvania
 
chikid68 wrote:
I have noticed (around here at least) the trend of photographers is to favor Nikon cameras over Canon or other brands.
The irony is that they are not even using the top models but rather a basic cropped sensor model.
Is this an indication of better quality or just minimal budget.


From what I've been reading over the years I've been a UHH member, your observation is not as accurate as you may believe it to be.
Canon is still the number one camera manufacturer with a market share that dwarfs Nikon. Odds are that same trend is reflected in the gear owned by UHH membership.
I'm not saying Canon is better than Nikon, I own and use both.
My current daily shooters are my Nikon D850, Canon R5 and Canon R7. I have not retired my Canon 5D mk IV or Nikon D500, but they don't get used as much as they used to.
Of the cameras I mentioned, 3 are Canon and 2 are Nikon, 3 are full frame and all 5 are top shelf models, not the basic models you are referring to.
I consider myself to be an average UHH member, and not a professional photographer. Just a person who likes taking photos and enjoys having and using good gear. I also rarely post images to UHH. The only person I'm trying to impress is me.

Reply
Dec 21, 2022 19:04:59   #
flip1948 Loc: Hamden, CT
 
Architect1776 wrote:
DXO is a subsidiary of Sony/Nikon...

Really?

Prove it.

Reply
Dec 21, 2022 19:06:41   #
CHG_CANON Loc: the Windy City
 
flip1948 wrote:
Really?

Prove it.


This is something everyone knows but you?

Reply
Dec 21, 2022 19:16:57   #
Longshadow Loc: Audubon, PA, United States
 
All I found was DXO<mark> is its own entity.

Reply
 
 
Dec 21, 2022 19:38:24   #
steveo52 Loc: Rhode Island and Ocala Florida
 
CHG_CANON wrote:
LOL - the market, rather than UHH, says people prefer Canon digital cameras at a rate of 4.7 Canons to every 2.2 Sony to 1.8 Nikon.

But certainly, just reading the UHH squawk box, one would think the numbers are 8 Nikons to 1 each of Sony and Canon.




Reply
Dec 21, 2022 20:44:24   #
gwilliams6
 
Architect1776 wrote:
Average age is why.


Exactly,

Reply
Dec 21, 2022 20:56:46   #
gwilliams6
 
CHG_CANON wrote:
LOL - the market, rather than UHH, says people prefer Canon digital cameras at a rate of 4.7 Canons to every 2.2 Sony to 1.8 Nikon.

But certainly, just reading the UHH squawk box, one would think the numbers are 8 Nikons to 1 each of Sony and Canon.


LOL but not when just counting mirrorless camera preferences, where Sony outsells Canon mirrorless and Nikon mirrorless, worldwide. CIPA numbers confirm that.

But it is more age as a factor here in UHH. People here that have been shooting a long time, historically started out with Nikon when they were THE brand, and they have been loyal and stuck with Nikon.
FYI, I shot Nikon and Canon pro gear for over four decades, both brands.

As far as pros, the major News Services have ditched their Nikon and Canon DSLRs and moved to Sony mirrorless overwhelmingly.

Associated Press, Canadian Press, UK Press, all Gannett media including USA Today have all moved exclusively to Sony mirrorless for their staff photographers and staff videographers worldwide in the past 24 months.

AFP (Agence France Presse) helped develop and test the Nikon Z9 and uses the Z9 for their staffers worldwide. None of these major news services has stayed with Canon DSLRs or moved to Canon mirrorless, none.

And not for any special financial deal from Sony but for better rate of innovation, reliability and proven experience in fullframe mirrorless .

Listen to them in their own words, this is the new reality in the pro world:
https://alphauniverse.com/stories/why-the-associated-press-just-switched-to-sony/

https://petapixel.com/2021/11/17/sony-is-now-the-exclusive-camera-provider-for-gannett-and-usa-today/

https://www.dpreview.com/news/4545693607/the-uk-largest-news-agency-partners-with-sony

https://petapixel.com/2022/01/31/canadas-largest-news-organization-moves-exclusively-to-sony-cameras/#:~:text=Canada's%20Largest%20News%20Agency%20Moves%20Exclusively%20to%20Sony%20Cameras,-Jan%2031%2C%202022&text=The%20Canadian%20Press%2C%20the%20largest,provider%20for%20the%20media%20company.

https://petapixel.com/2022/06/09/how-pro-photographers-helped-make-the-z9-from-prototype-to-flagship/

Cheers and best to you.

Reply
Dec 21, 2022 21:16:50   #
flip1948 Loc: Hamden, CT
 
CHG_CANON wrote:
This is something everyone knows but you?

No, it's just another outrageous anti-anything but Canon claim from Archie.



Reply
Page <prev 2 of 14 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.