ddtroupe wrote:
Hello,
I live in the Seattle area where we are currently getting snow. You might be aware that snow in the Puget Sound region is not all that common. We might get a "small load" once or twice a year and it usually doesn't stay around long. But, because we aren't accustomed to snow, it snarls and messes up traffic in a big way. Enough about weather.
I'm a professor now, after a long career at Boeing. I think airplanes are spectacular inventions and to think that they can actually move with determination through the air is exhilarating.
I love photography, though I'm not an expert. (That's why I like hearing from you!) I especially enjoy subjects in nature and glorious landscapes, sunrises, and sunsets.
I have used a Nikon D7000 for years now, but decided to upgrade so I can more easily extract photos from the camera (which would encourage me to photograph more). I chose a Sony a7iii and a Sigma 24-70 f2.8 DG DN Art lens. No special reason for these choices, except that I found few complaints.
If you have suggestions about what additional equipment I should purchase, please identify. Thank you.
DT
Hello, br I live in the Seattle area where we are ... (
show quote)
After over four decades using the best pro gear from Nikon and Canon, I moved over to Sony mirrorless back in January 2017 and have absolutely no regrets on the big move. I have owned Sony A6500, A7RII, A7RIII, A7III, A9 and currently own A7RIV, A1, A7SIII. I also currently own 13 native E-mount lenses covering 10mm to 600mm from Sony, Sigma and Tamron.
The Sony A7III is still a great camera choice. It is the single fullframe mirrorless camera model whose overwhelming reception and success worldwide was what finally forced Canon and Nikon to get serious about fullframe mirrorless . All independent reviewers and experts agree on that.
Sigma makes superb mirrorless-designed native E-mount lenses. I have that superb Sigma Art 24-70mm f2.8 DG DN and it is excellent in image quality and features. I will post some shots from that.
Two great choices IMHO.
Two excellent additional choices that wont break the bank:
The Tamron 17-28mm f2.8 lens will give you that wider range for some landscapes. I will post some shots.
1) Sigma Art 24-70mm f2.8 DG DN, Sony A7RIV. The Golden Gate Bridge, San Francisco, California, USA. 24mm, ISO 200, f8, 1/80 sec. handheld.
2) Hilly California street, San Francisco. Shot from aboard a cable car. Sigma Art 24-70mm f2.8 DG DN lens, 70mm, ISO 400, F5, 1/400 sec. Handheld
3) Horseshoe Bend and the Colorado River, Page, Arizona, USA. Tamron 17-28mm f2.8 lens, A7RIV. 17mm, ISO 100, f8. A HDR shot of five exposure-bracketed shots, merged in LR.
4) Sunrise over famed Monument Valley, scene of countless movies, TV shows, commercials, Navajo Lands, Arizona/Utah border, USA. A7RIV, Tamron 17-28mm f2.8 lens. 28mm, ISO 100, f22, 1/30 sec.
And the Tamron 70-180mm f2.8 lens will give you that longer reach you might need. It is very sharp, focuses fast. That 180-200mm range is great for scenics with a different perspective. Here two shots at 200mm, made with my A7RIV and Sony 200-600mn f5.6-6.3 lens.
5) Monument Valley again, 200mm
6) Venice Beach and the Pacific Ocean, Los Angeles, California, USA. 200mm
7) A great macro lens that wont break the bank, The Sigma Art 70mm f2.8 Macro DG lens, Sony A7III, a Dragonfly in Manistee National Forest, Michigan, USA. 70mm, ISO 6400, f22, 1/1000 sec,. handheld, all natural sunlight only.
Click on download to see better image quality of each shot.
I also am a longtime Professor of Photography at a state university.
Cheers and best to you.