jlg1000
Loc: Uruguay / South America
mrchunko wrote:
and sorry I bought it - for sale, cheap, $400
Hmmm... considering that the item does not exist, I believe that yours is a high asking price.
$0.00, including S&H, would be more like so...
mrchunko wrote:
I have a canon R10 camera that I purchased and am hearing unfavorable reviews about-and it looks like what it is - overpriced, unnecessary, shiny junk!
Actually, the Canon EOS R10 is an excellent consumer grade camera that costs under $1000. You don't know what you are talking about. I was going to buy an R10 but decided to go with its more expensive big brother, the R7. Why did I pick the R7 over the R10? Because I could afford it.
Another thing, Tony and Chelsea Northrup named the R10 their camera of the year. Why did they choose such an inexpensive camera? Because it is well made, not overpriced, and is the ideal dedicated camera for folks who want a good quality camera but will probably never use the features on a more expensive camera.
Also, I've read and heard nothing but good reviews on the R10.
rehess
Loc: South Bend, Indiana, USA
rmorrison1116 wrote:
Actually, the Canon EOS R10 is an excellent consumer grade camera that costs under $1000. You don't know what you are talking about. I was going to buy an R10 but decided to go with its more expensive big brother, the R7. Why did I pick the R7 over the R10? Because I could afford it.
Another thing, Tony and Chelsea Northrup named the R10 their camera of the year. Why did they choose such an inexpensive camera? Because it is well made, not overpriced, and is the ideal dedicated camera for folks who want a good quality camera but will probably never use the features on a more expensive camera.
Also, I've read and heard nothing but good reviews on the R10.
Actually, the Canon EOS R10 is an excellent consum... (
show quote)
My limit is about $1000. Ten years ago, I was a happy Canon user, then I was “let down” by two Rebels in a row. The R10 sounds good to me. If I were to go back to Canon, I would probably try it. Initial quality is not my concern - longevity is.
rehess wrote:
My limit is about $1000. Ten years ago, I was a happy Canon user, then I was “let down” by two Rebels in a row. The R10 sounds good to me. If I were to go back to Canon, I would probably try it. Initial quality is not my concern - longevity is.
How were you let down and by which two Rebel models?
rmorrison1116 wrote:
How were you let down and by which two Rebel models?
He recounted it again, for the upteenth time on UHH, just a few replies earlier in this thread.
I did - my canon t5i is a gem and I’m glad I have it!
Sold, gone. Friend bought it!
Cheap made, lightweight crap that in my opinion will never stand up in the long run to earlier, weightier cameras. 18-45mm lens is a joke. My opinion only!
Mcwane
Loc: Southwestern Virginia
mrchunko wrote:
Cheap made, lightweight crap that in my opinion will never stand up in the long run to earlier, weightier cameras. 18-45mm lens is a joke. My opinion only!
Good for you, I like my R10. Just my opinion.
Thanks I appreciate your input; I guess it’s ironic to buy and then read reviews!
Happy shooting! Take care!
Mike
Mcwane wrote:
Good for you, I like my R10. Just my opinion.
The Canon R crop sensors are good cameras. I assume the R full frame are as good or better.
I have the R7, RF-s 18-150, RF 100-400 and RF 100-500L, RF 1.4x, EF to RF adaptor
R7 + RF-s 18-150, small light for general photography, a very good combo.
R7 + RF 100-400, when I might find birds and want to keep things light, since it only uses the center of the image it is almost as good as my EF 100-400L mk2, This is a great combo.
R7 + RF 100-500L for when I am definitely going after birds, this is an excellent combo.
I also have a 5DIV, 6D, 7DII, 80D and 90D - my wife has a T6s and we have 15 total EF lenses from 14 to 600 mm. And we have 3 bridge cameras, Fuji HS10, Canon SX50 and Sony RX10iv. and Kenko extender 1.4x & 2x, Tamron 1.4x (for my 150-600 G2 and the Canon Ef 1.4x III.
Panasonic and Olympus pocket zooms also.
So I think I have seen enough cameras to tell if something is good or "cheap junk". None of them are cheap junk. I have friends with all Nikon gear and their stuff isn't junk either.
Thanks for all the information I appreciate it. I’ll just stick with my Canon t5i!
Take care!
If you have this camera, enjoy it. I hate it. Confusing graphics, little information in the print manual (I know there’s an online version), I can’t get it out of live view; it’s totally not for me. I’m going to stick with my t5i and enjoy it. Thanks for your response, I appreciate it.
jlg1000
Loc: Uruguay / South America
mrchunko wrote:
If you have this camera, enjoy it. I hate it. Confusing graphics, little information in the print manual (I know there’s an online version), I can’t get it out of live view; it’s totally not for me. I’m going to stick with my t5i and enjoy it. Thanks for your response, I appreciate it.
..."I can’t get it out of live view"...
What ?
No, wait, WHAT !!??
/* Mirrorless is everything about "live view" */
Just glue a mirror in front of the sensor to get rid of the "live view" mode.
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.