Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
Why RAW?
Page <<first <prev 9 of 20 next> last>>
Dec 14, 2022 08:35:12   #
foathog Loc: Greensboro, NC
 
I only shoot in the RAW

Reply
Dec 14, 2022 08:38:31   #
Longshadow Loc: Audubon, PA, United States
 
jlg1000 wrote:
Yes, it means "Really Admirable Work"



If we start using it in that context it will REALLY confuse a lot of people!

Reply
Dec 14, 2022 09:30:28   #
fjo Loc: Georgetown Texas
 
CHG_CANON wrote:
Raw isn't just a file format, it's a way of life. RAW is one of the true wonders of modern digital photography. Many times while editing my RAW files, I begin to see my connection to the fabric of the universe.


Thinking way too deep about this.

Reply
 
 
Dec 14, 2022 09:32:54   #
Longshadow Loc: Audubon, PA, United States
 
fjo wrote:
Thinking way too deep about this.

(I like his humor. )

Reply
Dec 14, 2022 09:38:20   #
foathog Loc: Greensboro, NC
 
fjo wrote:
Thinking way too deep about this.


He's in his own little bubble. It comes from inhaling too much fixer in the darkroom.

Reply
Dec 14, 2022 09:49:25   #
Picture Taker Loc: Michigan Thumb
 
RAW is better to repair your photos.

Reply
Dec 14, 2022 09:50:32   #
CHG_CANON Loc: the Windy City
 
Too many people subscribe to advanced software to edit RAW files to impress people they don't even like.

Reply
 
 
Dec 14, 2022 09:53:27   #
burkphoto Loc: High Point, NC
 
cmc4214 wrote:
There will never bs consistency over long periods of time...someone always has a "better" idea


Let the academic standards bearers put a stamp on that, first.

It's like using "impact" as a verb. If I did that in college, I would get an automatic F on a paper. Harbrace Handbook said that was verboten! Today, it is listed in most dictionaries as both a noun and a verb, probably because Boomer journalists protested so loudly by using it in news stories as a verb. Smashing.

Reply
Dec 14, 2022 10:01:22   #
Longshadow Loc: Audubon, PA, United States
 
burkphoto wrote:
Let the academic standards bearers put a stamp on that, first.

It's like using "impact" as a verb. If I did that in college, I would get an automatic F on a paper. Harbrace Handbook said that was verboten! Today, it is listed in most dictionaries as both a noun and a verb, probably because Boomer journalists protested so loudly by using it in news stories as a verb. Smashing.

Things change, sometimes for the better, sometimes for worse.

I like being able to say "...will impact..." without reprisal.
Not that I would care...

Reply
Dec 14, 2022 10:12:40   #
DavidPine Loc: Fredericksburg, TX
 
Shoot the way you are most comfortable. There are many professional and highly paid photographers that shoot JPG while on assignment and there are some who only shoot RAW while being paid. I only shot RAW for about 11-years and I am just now, at 80, shooting some monochrome JGPs. I find them quite editable. I have always strived to "get it right in camera" and so I feel it matters little anymore. Photography is a science and it is also personal. Shoot what and how you want.

Reply
Dec 14, 2022 10:13:15   #
Larryshuman
 
Using Raw I can do much more with raw than I can with a JPG. Changing blue shade with a little color yellow. I have lens corrections on ARC. I can change highlights, raise shadows much more easy than a JPG. If you ever shot film that is raw is the same as film but much better than film these days.

Reply
 
 
Dec 14, 2022 10:27:16   #
47greyfox Loc: on the edge of the Colorado front range
 
CHG_CANON wrote:
A 6000x4000-pixel RAW has exactly the same 24MP as the corresponding JPEG. Anyone that doesn't understand this 'basics of digital photography' probably should turn in their digital camera.


Wouldn’t that be a step backwards? Being left with their Instamatic (sic?) could be fatal.

Reply
Dec 14, 2022 10:29:02   #
David Martin Loc: Cary, NC
 
burkphoto wrote:
It's like using "impact" as a verb. If I did that in college, I would get an automatic F on a paper. Harbrace Handbook said that was verboten! Today, it is listed in most dictionaries as both a noun and a verb, probably because Boomer journalists protested so loudly by using it in news stories as a verb. Smashing.

Well, in gastroenterology we used "impact" as a verb.
And "impacted" as an adjective (and diagnosis).
But that's another entire matter altogether!

Which might explain why, when someone or some righteous cause is described as "impactful," it brings me a smile.

Reply
Dec 14, 2022 10:49:28   #
Architect1776 Loc: In my mind
 
jlg1000 wrote:
Yes, it means "Really Admirable Work"



Reply
Dec 14, 2022 10:53:14   #
Picture Taker Loc: Michigan Thumb
 
Not admiral work, its photo repair

Reply
Page <<first <prev 9 of 20 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.