goldenyears wrote:
This is just a curiosity question. From watching Shark Tank I've seen that there is usually a very big difference between a manufacturer's cost and a retailer's selling price. At least that has to be the case in order to get offers from the sharks. Does anyone know what the total markup is for DSLR and Mirrorless cameras?
When you say "manufacturer's cost" I believe you are speaking about the cost TO the retailer. That is not the manufacturer's cost. The price to the retailer is based on what the market will bear and NOT the cost to manufacture it. In other words the price is determined by how much the market will pay and that can be a real number or an educated estimate by the mfr.
It would appear that cameras are fair traded. (This gets complicated and does not necessarily have to occur between countries but can be totally within one country and there are numerous laws regulating the practice.)
Basically, this means that that the mfr regulates (establishes/sets) the price that the retailer can sell the item for. You may have noticed that the only time a retailer lowers the price for a fair traded XYZ camera model or lens is at the same time that the mfr also has put those items on sale. That is easily apparent this time of year with Black Friday sales.
So, I am assuming you are asking about the percentage differential between the price the retailer pays to the mfr and the price he charges to the retail customer. I do not have a background in retail sales or operations but have had occasion to observe them and I would estimate the markup between the price to the retailer and the price to the customer is between two and three hundred percent. I base this on what I have observed in certain sporting goods and electronics venues.
There are laws that mandate a mfr must sell a product at the same price to all of his customers, but that price can be modified by certain pre-approved circumstances. For example, your local camera store may pay $500 for a camera, which is theoretically the same base price B&H pays. But B&H also takes advantage of the bracket pricing offered by the mfr and pays less per unit.
As an over-simplified example, this means the larger the quantity you buy the more the item is discounted. B&H would also get numerous other price advantages like advertising adjustments, promotional events etc.
Therefore, the amount between the various retailers' costs and their selling prices could vary greatly. Hence, it is hard to give an exact number to the question you asked, but I think you can safely put the number between 200 and 300% much of the time. Of course this varies by industry, and circumstances, and I have no idea what the photo market does.
I have used B&H as an example, only to illustrate the point, because they are typically recognized as a leader in this industry. I am sure that everything they do regarding pricing is legal and ethical and above board. They are a leader in their industry because of their commendable business practices that include sales, customer service, return policies, advertising and general business practices etc. I wish all of American businesses were as ethical as B&H.