Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
Protective filter
Page <<first <prev 4 of 7 next> last>>
Nov 26, 2022 19:46:44   #
Toment Loc: FL, IL
 
Ruthlessrider wrote:
How could I do that to such handsome boy.


I think I heard him say something about thinking it was a Nikon.

Reply
Nov 26, 2022 19:59:52   #
SteveFranz Loc: Durham, NC
 
I was on a windswept beach in Iceland a year ago. (Black Beach near Vik) The wind was strong enough that the sand being kicked up really stung my face. When I got back to the car I noticed that the filter was pitted in a few places. And I had been careful to keep the lens cover on except when I was actually taking a picture.

Reply
Nov 26, 2022 20:47:00   #
User ID
 
SteveFranz wrote:
I was on a windswept beach in Iceland a year ago. (Black Beach near Vik) The wind was strong enough that the sand being kicked up really stung my face. When I got back to the car I noticed that the filter was pitted in a few places. And I had been careful to keep the lens cover on except when I was actually taking a picture.

Was it a $275 filter ? Pleeeeease let it be that ! Pitting a $40 filter is just borrrring.


(Download)


(Download)

Reply
 
 
Nov 27, 2022 06:32:46   #
jerryc41 Loc: Catskill Mts of NY
 
Ava'sPapa wrote:
Can't argue with success.


This is UHH. You can argue about anything!

Reply
Nov 27, 2022 08:01:53   #
mdoing
 
billnikon wrote:
No thanks. I prefer my lenses and many other things naked.


I see the benefits of naked however in 1984 I dropped my brand new Canon EOS650 on the flagstones of a restaurant in Amsterdam at the start of our first European trip. Landed right on the UV filter, shattered it, I thought I was going to die, lens and camera were fine! Been a protective filter guy ever since! Never noticed any image problems with high quality filters, B+W, Polarpro, Breakthrough Tech.

Reply
Nov 27, 2022 08:10:17   #
billnikon Loc: Pennsylvania/Ohio/Florida/Maui/Oregon/Vermont
 
mdoing wrote:
I see the benefits of naked however in 1984 I dropped my brand new Canon EOS650 on the flagstones of a restaurant in Amsterdam at the start of our first European trip. Landed right on the UV filter, shattered it, I thought I was going to die, lens and camera were fine! Been a protective filter guy ever since! Never noticed any image problems with high quality filters, B+W, Polarpro, Breakthrough Tech.


I have dropped a lens WITHOUT a filter, hit the front element, NOTHING happened.
The front element of a lens is about 5-10 times more resistant to shattering than a filter, ANY FILTER.
Don't believe it, watch this
https://backcountrygallery.com/all-about-uv-filters/

Like Steve, the only useful filter, and the only filter I use on a lens is a Polarizer. A UV filter used for protection is a myth. Your end element on most modern lenses can take more punishment than you think.
Personally I would never use any filter covering my expensive glass lenses, it is a waste of money.

Reply
Nov 27, 2022 09:25:56   #
CHG_CANON Loc: the Windy City
 
Ken Rockwell puts a filter on all his lenses. I can't believe the number of people who profess to be 0.3% more knowledgeable of photography than Ken Rockwell.

Reply
 
 
Nov 27, 2022 09:36:46   #
imagemeister Loc: mid east Florida
 
CHG_CANON wrote:
Ken Rockwell puts a filter on all his lenses. I can't believe the number of people who profess to be 0.3% more knowledgeable of photography than Ken Rockwell.


Yes, this is one area Ken and I do NOT agree - but that does not keep me from respecting his experience ! Everyone has a few idiosyncrasies and this is one of his ! .....
.

Reply
Nov 27, 2022 09:57:51   #
CHG_CANON Loc: the Windy City
 
Imagine your own epitaph: He never used filters

Reply
Nov 27, 2022 14:42:26   #
waltnetto Loc: LaVerne, CA
 
Ruthlessrider wrote:
How could I do that to such handsome boy.


Agreed. You couldn't as that boy is priceless!

Reply
Nov 27, 2022 16:46:53   #
Dennis833 Loc: Australia
 
I don't have a dog so I don't use protective filters. I do use neutral density filters quite a lot but I don't like the time and effort it takes to remove one filter and add another.

Reply
 
 
Nov 27, 2022 22:23:42   #
flip1948 Loc: Hamden, CT
 
CHG_CANON wrote:
Ken Rockwell puts a filter on all his lenses. I can't believe the number of people who profess to be 0.3% more knowledgeable of photography than Ken Rockwell.

Possibly because he refuses to use lens hoods. Read that many times in his reviews.

Reply
Nov 27, 2022 22:29:34   #
imagemeister Loc: mid east Florida
 
flip1948 wrote:
Possibly because he refuses to use lens hoods. Read that many times in his reviews.



Reply
Nov 27, 2022 22:31:43   #
CHG_CANON Loc: the Windy City
 
The best protection many photographers seem to use is being ignorant of the risks.

Reply
Nov 27, 2022 22:49:17   #
User ID
 
billnikon wrote:
I have dropped a lens WITHOUT a filter, hit the front element, NOTHING happened.
The front element of a lens is about 5-10 times more resistant to shattering than a filter, ANY FILTER.
Don't believe it, watch this
https://backcountrygallery.com/all-about-uv-filters/

Like Steve, the only useful filter, and the only filter I use on a lens is a Polarizer. A UV filter used for protection is a myth. Your end element on most modern lenses can take more punishment than you think.
Personally I would never use any filter covering my expensive glass lenses, it is a waste of money.
I have dropped a lens WITHOUT a filter, hit the fr... (show quote)

YOU GO GIRL !
Tell it like it was !


(Download)

Reply
Page <<first <prev 4 of 7 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.