One can see the removal of the rim at the eastern side that made entry easier. What was put in there is a mystery. I feel that it is of unnatural nature.
The image was made possible by NASA's Quickmap site. Which is gained by: quickmap.lroc.asu.edu. The colon is not part of the address.
One can see the removal of the rim at the eastern side that made entry easier. Sort of jumping to conclusions, would one say?
--Bob
Streets wrote:
One can see the removal of the rim at the eastern side that made entry easier. What was put in there is a mystery. I feel that it is of unnatural nature.
The image was made possible by NASA's Quickmap site. Which is gained by: quickmap.lroc.asu.edu. The colon is not part of the address.
joecichjr
Loc: Chicago S. Suburbs, Illinois, USA
Streets wrote:
One can see the removal of the rim at the eastern side that made entry easier. What was put in there is a mystery. I feel that it is of unnatural nature.
The image was made possible by NASA's Quickmap site. Which is gained by: quickmap.lroc.asu.edu. The colon is not part of the address.
I'm glad I looked back up at the title after I read your explanation. I thought it was a colonoscopy with a dirty lens of something 🙃🙃🙃🙃🙃
rmalarz wrote:
One can see the removal of the rim at the eastern side that made entry easier. Sort of jumping to conclusions, would one say?
--Bob
Not at all. There are many craters that have similar items in them if one looks for them. The Lunar farside would scare the hell out of you if quickmap would allow us to see the same resolution that is allowed on the nearside. By the way, I captured this image in 2016.
You captured this image using what?
Additionally, evidence collected during the Apollo Project and from unmanned spacecraft of the same period proved conclusively that meteoric impact, or impact by asteroids for larger craters, was the origin of almost all lunar craters, and by implication, most craters on other bodies as well.
--Bob
Streets wrote:
Not at all. There are many craters that have similar items in them if one looks for them. The Lunar farside would scare the hell out of you if quickmap would allow us to see the same resolution that is allowed on the nearside. By the way, I captured this image in 2016.
Streets wrote:
One can see the removal of the rim at the eastern side that made entry easier. What was put in there is a mystery. I feel that it is of unnatural nature.
The image was made possible by NASA's Quickmap site. Which is gained by: quickmap.lroc.asu.edu. The colon is not part of the address.
Let's see, crap hitting the moon for a few million years.
The rim getting hit by a glancing blow, other strikes, who knows.
Why waste effort coming billions of miles to push some dirt around a bit on the moon when there is this big planet only about 230k more miles away.
I worked at the NASA Manned Spacecraft Center for a bit over a year on the installation and debugging team of the Apollo Mission Simulator and had many conversations with various astronauts and most expected to find examples of alien presence there. I would recommend that you look at quickmap and see how much that they do not want you to see at the higher resolutions that are available. Lots of dithering and outright blackouting.
Streets wrote:
One can see the removal of the rim at the eastern side that made entry easier. What was put in there is a mystery. I feel that it is of unnatural nature.
The image was made possible by NASA's Quickmap site. Which is gained by: quickmap.lroc.asu.edu. The colon is not part of the address.
I'm with you on this one ---
But think it was put together by those intergalactic folks that built the Pyramids
Streets wrote:
I worked at the NASA Manned Spacecraft Center for a bit over a year on the installation and debugging team of the Apollo Mission Simulator and had many conversations with various astronauts and most expected to find examples of alien presence there. I would recommend that you look at quickmap and see how much that they do not want you to see at the higher resolutions that are available. Lots of dithering and outright blackouting.
Do you need a tinfoil hat?
Why travel millions of miles and quit before making it to earth and making one's presence known besides to the local drug addicts and tinfoil hat club?
Architect1776 wrote:
Do you need a tinfoil hat?
Why travel millions of miles and quit before making it to earth and making one's presence known besides to the local drug addicts and tinfoil hat club?
Here are two more craters of interest. These show that entry was from the west side of the craters. These craters are nearly the size of the one in the original photo.
Rather than conspiracy theories, you should acquaint yourself with meteor crater ballistics. You seem to approach this with an already formulated concept of what happened. Instead, I'd suggest an approach where all of the possibilities are considered and compared with known data and reach an intellectual conclusion. Thus, considering the trajectory of the object which caused the crater, the possible velocity of said object, etc. It's a bit more scientific than a woo-woo theory.
--Bob
Streets wrote:
Here are two more craters of interest. These show that entry was from the west side of the craters. These craters are nearly the size of the one in the original photo.
the items in these two craters are not Lunar material, but made by intelligent beings.
Streets wrote:
I worked at the NASA Manned Spacecraft Center for a bit over a year on the installation and debugging team of the Apollo Mission Simulator and had many conversations with various astronauts and most expected to find examples of alien presence there.
I guess it may who you were speaking with. In my case I've had some interesting (and multiple) conversations with four moonwalkers and three CMP's and none of them expressed finding/seeing anything alien. (Other than Smilin' Al telling me they brought back a skeleton of a "luna tick" which they kept hush-hush. He was a riot when he was in a good mood)
As for the craters.. (Someone sent me this a while back and sorry I couldn't resist)
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.