I just decided to upgrade to a new computer with a faster processor, graphics card and 4 TB CCD. My LR photos are under 1 TB. Currently, when I do a backup (old computer)it takes about 24 hrs and then again for the 3rd backup spinner. I worry that a long copy time period has a greater probability of a power blink or whatever. I’m also considering also using LR (cloud) so I’m not the only one responsible for backing up (so to speak). I have not used LR (cloud) but hope I will like it and be less worried.
mikee wrote:
I've recently purchased a gaming computer for photo editing. It has a 1 tb ssd for the operating system. My preference is to use an external drive for my data storage and not fill up my internal ssd. I see that one can purchase an 8 tb ssd on ebay new for under $50, or go name brand for half the capacity and $400. Should I get another external hard drive (mechanical) or external ssd? Does brand name matter? Thx.
Don't believe you can buy an 8TB for $50 that will be any good. Way way too cheap. Caution
TriX
Loc: Raleigh, NC
DavidThompson wrote:
I just decided to upgrade to a new computer with a faster processor, graphics card and 4 TB CCD. My LR photos are under 1 TB. Currently, when I do a backup (old computer)it takes about 24 hrs and then again for the 3rd backup spinner. I worry that a long copy time period has a greater probability of a power blink or whatever. I’m also considering also using LR (cloud) so I’m not the only one responsible for backing up (so to speak). I have not used LR (cloud) but hope I will like it and be less worried.
I just decided to upgrade to a new computer with a... (
show quote)
If your backup is taking 24 hours (!), it sounds as if you are doing a complete backup of the disk. While you need to do that once (the first time), you should be backing up incrementals (changes and new files since last backup) after that, and that should cut your backup window dramatically. How often do you back up? And are you backing up to a local disk, over your network, or via the internet to the cloud?
Wow, never heard of them.
But then I don't go looking for drives often, and stick with what I know is reliable.
Mr. SONY wrote:
ALL drives eventually fail, spinning drives just fail more often.
I haven't had one fail in years.
I've replaced a number of them though.
But that because I outgrew them.
I keep two old Seagate drives in a box and plug them in once in a while, well, just because.
They are 80gb's!
They are so old and need both usb cables on older computers which have underpowered usb ports.
There is nothing wrong with ssd drives other than cost.
So, to many people rely on one drive for backup which is not the best, not at all.
Not everybody has or wants to spend so much money on backup drives.
For the cost of two 4tb ssd drives they could have six 5tb backup drives.
That's all.
ALL drives eventually fail, spinning drives just f... (
show quote)
I have probably a dozen hard drives that I removed from old computers. I use some for backups, but "extra" backups.
I like the enclosures that hold four drives. Some can be used for NAS, but I have a couple just for random backups.
I didn't like the cooling of this YottaMaster, so I added two fans to the top.
That's so box you have there.
My drive collection is so boring.
Tomorrow I'll post a boring picture.
jerryc41 wrote:
I have probably a dozen hard drives that I removed from old computers. I use some for backups, but "extra" backups. I like the enclosures that hold four drives. Some can be used for NAS, but I have a couple just for random backups. I didn't like the cooling of this YottaMaster, so I added two fans to the top.
I think my 2 month old great grandson could make a prettier job than this. Couldn't resist.
DirtFarmer
Loc: Escaped from the NYC area, back to MA
chrissybabe wrote:
I think my 2 month old great grandson could make a prettier job than this. Couldn't resist.
Pretty and functional are completely different things.
DirtFarmer wrote:
Pretty and functional are completely different things.
Or they can be the same and safer !
That goes far beyond ugly...
photoman43 wrote:
My computer guy does not recommend SSD drives for long term storage unless they are plugged in (turned on) from time to time as activation from time to time is needed to insure that data is not lost.
This is not true. The charge on the floating gate of the flash memory cell is established at write time. Powering up the part will have no effect on this charge. What does happen with the charge is that it can bleed away, very, very slowly, and can reach a point where a flash cell loses its programmed state. Some cells may also have a lower impedance and can lose their charge faster, but this would show up as a bad bit that might be repaired on-the-fly with error detection and correction as long as the device has not exceeded the number of bad bits it can correct per sector.
I suspect that your computer guy is somehow mixing up DRAM with flash memory. DRAM is volatile, and when power goes away, the contents of the memory goes away. But when it is powered up, the charge is stored on tiny, tiny capacitors which are recharged during refresh cycles. And as long as this continues to happen, the data remains intact.
Longshadow wrote:
Wow, never heard of them.
But then I don't go looking for drives often, and stick with what I know is reliable.
Yes, Hynix is a very reputable manufacturer of flash memory. I have traveled to their manufacturing facilities in South Korea a number of times.
Actually, there are only a handful of manufacturers in the world that manufacture flash memory. The fabs are very expensive. The equipment needed is very expensive. The expertise of the engineers and fab people are critical.
Where one can find less than stellar quality is in the 3rd parties that buy the Known Good Die from one of the known manufacturers and insert it into their own packaging with a memory manager of unknown quality.
JimH123 wrote:
Yes, Hynix is a very reputable manufacturer of flash memory. I have traveled to their manufacturing facilities in South Korea a number of times.
Actually, there are only a handful of manufacturers in the world that manufacture flash memory. The fabs are very expensive. The equipment needed is very expensive. The expertise of the engineers and fab people are critical.
Where one can find less than stellar quality is in the 3rd parties that buy the Known Good Die from one of the known manufacturers and insert it into their own packaging with a memory manager of unknown quality.
Yes, Hynix is a very reputable manufacturer of fla... (
show quote)
I didn't know they were flash. I thought the conversation I was in was about hard drives.
Longshadow wrote:
I didn't know they were flash. I thought the conversation I was in was about hard drives.
SSD's are made using Flash memory. And the discussion involves SSDs vs Hard Drives for storage.
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.