I saw this image in Stellarium and thought this would be a great image to capture, but no, it was just too faint to obtain a good image. I took 45 images at 5 minutes per image on an eight inch RC telescope. I used a CEM 40 mount with the ASIAIR Plus doing all the heavy lifting. I was impressed because the guiding was about .25 pixels! I found a new attachment point for the guide scope. I threw away the ST-4 cable and tied the guide scope camera, a ZWO 120 MC, directly the the ASIAIR red box. Great guiding, but the image was not that good. I stacked 45 images in Deep Sky Stacker and post-processed them in Gimp. I really stink at this, too! Well, I tried, but I was extremely satisfied with the way the mount performed. The area I was in was a Bortle 3 sky. The location was about 50 miles Southwest of Las Vegas nestled in a valley surrounded by ridges. Really isolated here! I will return there, soon. Anyone who wants to go along, PM me. Always like company. Well to the image itself. Please have mercy. RFB
Ballard
Loc: Grass Valley, California
Railfan_Bill wrote:
I saw this image in Stellarium and thought this would be a great image to capture, but no, it was just too faint to obtain a good image. I took 45 images at 5 minutes per image on an eight inch RC telescope. I used a CEM 40 mount with the ASIAIR Plus doing all the heavy lifting. I was impressed because the guiding was about .25 pixels! I found a new attachment point for the guide scope. I threw away the ST-4 cable and tied the guide scope camera, a ZWO 120 MC, directly the the ASIAIR red box. Great guiding, but the image was not that good. I stacked 45 images in Deep Sky Stacker and post-processed them in Gimp. I really stink at this, too! Well, I tried, but I was extremely satisfied with the way the mount performed. The area I was in was a Bortle 3 sky. The location was about 50 miles Southwest of Las Vegas nestled in a valley surrounded by ridges. Really isolated here! I will return there, soon. Anyone who wants to go along, PM me. Always like company. Well to the image itself. Please have mercy. RFB
I saw this image in Stellarium and thought this wo... (
show quote)
Your guiding was bang on, looks like the ASIAIR red box works great. I normally use an offaxis guider with a guide camera and use a laptop running PHD for guiding. On decent nights I get .5 arc second guiding, on really good nights it can be .25 arc second guiding.
I have found that some objects require a lot of exposure time, on my shot of NGC 660 I had over 24 hours of exposure counting, luminance, red, green, blue and HA subframes (done over 5 nights) in the Bortle 4 skies where I live. See
https://www.uglyhedgehog.com/t-755331-1.html
Marc G
Loc: East Grinstead, West Sussex, England
Railfan_Bill wrote:
I saw this image in Stellarium and thought this would be a great image to capture, but no, it was just too faint to obtain a good image. I took 45 images at 5 minutes per image on an eight inch RC telescope. I used a CEM 40 mount with the ASIAIR Plus doing all the heavy lifting. I was impressed because the guiding was about .25 pixels! I found a new attachment point for the guide scope. I threw away the ST-4 cable and tied the guide scope camera, a ZWO 120 MC, directly the the ASIAIR red box. Great guiding, but the image was not that good. I stacked 45 images in Deep Sky Stacker and post-processed them in Gimp. I really stink at this, too! Well, I tried, but I was extremely satisfied with the way the mount performed. The area I was in was a Bortle 3 sky. The location was about 50 miles Southwest of Las Vegas nestled in a valley surrounded by ridges. Really isolated here! I will return there, soon. Anyone who wants to go along, PM me. Always like company. Well to the image itself. Please have mercy. RFB
I saw this image in Stellarium and thought this wo... (
show quote)
Hi Bill. Nice image. I am surprised that not more nebula showed up given the exposure time. I am willing to take a look at your data (stacked or unstacked) if you like?
Hi Marc, By all means you can see if this would come out better than what I did. All I ask is that you tell me the workflow and what software you used. I tried to send the stacked image, but the file was too big. RFB
Marc G
Loc: East Grinstead, West Sussex, England
Railfan_Bill wrote:
Hi Marc, By all means you can see if this would come out better than what I did. All I ask is that you tell me the workflow and what software you used. I tried to send the stacked image, but the file was too big. RFB
Hi Bill
I would be more than happy to take a look at the data & of course write my workflow.
How big is final stack? will it send via email? marceegee@tiscali.co.uk
Sorry, but the stack is too big for this forum. Thanks for the offer. RFB
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.