Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
Sunny 16 Rule
Page <prev 2 of 8 next> last>>
Nov 1, 2022 20:38:48   #
BebuLamar
 
I just have to conclude that your camera ISO rating is overrated by 2 stops.

Reply
Nov 1, 2022 20:41:10   #
mwsilvers Loc: Central New Jersey
 
DeanS wrote:
Can’t figure out why the “Sunny 16 Rule” doesn’t work so well on my 5D/IV. The lens is Canon 70-200 F4 L/II.

Conditions: Bright, sunny, mostly clear sky. All three shots SOOC.

First (IMG_3321): A Priority, F16, 200 ISO, 1/20 Exp (Yes, 1/20th SS)
Second: (IMG_3322): Manual Mode, F16, 200 ISO, 1/200
Third (IMG_3323): Manual Mode, F8, 200 ISO, 1/200

Comments?

Thanks


The Sunny 16 rule is from an earlier time and is less valid with modern cameras, especially if you are using fast lenses that often display the results of diffraction issues by f/16. It is rare indeed for me to use aperture smaller than f/11 in virtually any situation.

Reply
Nov 1, 2022 20:52:52   #
Grahame Loc: Fiji
 
mwsilvers wrote:
The Sunny 16 rule is from an earlier time and is less valid with modern cameras, especially if you are using fast lenses that often display the results of diffraction issues by f/16. It is rare indeed for me to use aperture smaller than f/11 in virtually any situation.


Yes the sunny 16 rule comes from an earlier time but is still relevant as it refers to the parameter settings with respect to A,S and ISO when shooting during a sunny day, whether a wide or small aperture is used.

If you set your parameters in a configuration equivalent to 14.6 EV (sunny 16) and take a pic with sky included on a sunny day the sky will look reasonably correct, not as per the ops image 2.

Reply
 
 
Nov 1, 2022 21:19:18   #
mwsilvers Loc: Central New Jersey
 
Grahame wrote:
Yes the sunny 16 rule comes from an earlier time but is still relevant as it refers to the parameter settings with respect to A,S and ISO when shooting during a sunny day, whether a wide or small aperture is used.

If you set your parameters in a configuration equivalent to 14.6 EV (sunny 16) and take a pic with sky included on a sunny day the sky will look reasonably correct, not as per the ops image 2.


If I use my 17mm f/1.4 manual focus prime lens at f/16 for a landscape, which is the smallest aperture for that lens, the softening effects of diffraction will be very obvious. If you understand the exposure triangle and have an internal light meter in your camera the Sunny 16 "rule" is not really as important today as it once might have been, and as I pointed out in this post and my previous one, if you are using a fast lens and f/16 is your smallest aperture it definitely is not a good idea to use it.

Reply
Nov 1, 2022 21:28:15   #
Grahame Loc: Fiji
 
mwsilvers wrote:
If I use my 17mm f/1.4 manual focus prime lens at f/16 for a landscape, which is the smallest aperture for that lens, the softening effects of diffraction will be very obvious. If you understand the exposure triangle and have an internal light meter in your camera the Sunny 16 "rule" is not really as important today as it once might have been, and as I pointed out in this post and my previous one, if you are using a fast lens and f/16 is your smallest aperture it definitely is not a good idea to use it.
If I use my 17mm f/1.4 manual focus prime lens at ... (show quote)


The OP's problem is that images have come out far too dark to what would be expected at the 'settings' he used.

The aperture/speed/ISO used, diffraction, metering methods and modes, bracketing or whether someone considers the sunny 16 rule/term significant are really irrelevant and not applicable to his problem/findings. His test/example images surely had no other significance other than demonstrating the final image 'brightness' anomaly results.

Reply
Nov 2, 2022 00:53:01   #
mwsilvers Loc: Central New Jersey
 
Grahame wrote:
The OP's problem is that images have come out far too dark to what would be expected at the 'settings' he used.

The aperture/speed/ISO used, diffraction, metering methods and modes, bracketing or whether someone considers the sunny 16 rule/term significant are really irrelevant and not applicable to his problem/findings. His test/example images surely had no other significance other than demonstrating the final image 'brightness' anomaly results.


I was aware of that. My point was just intended an argument against relying on the Sunny 16 "rule" in the first place.

Reply
Nov 2, 2022 05:06:25   #
BebuLamar
 
I must point out that when you use the sunny 16 rule you don't have to use f/16.

Reply
 
 
Nov 2, 2022 07:28:41   #
tdozier3 Loc: Northern Illinois
 
DeanS wrote:
Can’t figure out why the “Sunny 16 Rule” doesn’t work so well on my 5D/IV. The lens is Canon 70-200 F4 L/II.

Conditions: Bright, sunny, mostly clear sky. All three shots SOOC.

First (IMG_3321): A Priority, F16, 200 ISO, 1/20 Exp (Yes, 1/20th SS)
Second: (IMG_3322): Manual Mode, F16, 200 ISO, 1/200
Third (IMG_3323): Manual Mode, F8, 200 ISO, 1/200

Comments?

Thanks


Rules ? We don't need no stinking rules ! Rules are made to be broken .

Reply
Nov 2, 2022 07:57:12   #
AndyT Loc: Hampstead, New Hampshire
 
Whenever I've used the f/16 rule, it has always been underexposed so I always open up one stop.

Reply
Nov 2, 2022 08:04:57   #
dmeyer Loc: Marion, NC
 
DeanS wrote:
Can’t figure out why the “Sunny 16 Rule” doesn’t work so well on my 5D/IV. The lens is Canon 70-200 F4 L/II.

Conditions: Bright, sunny, mostly clear sky. All three shots SOOC.

First (IMG_3321): A Priority, F16, 200 ISO, 1/20 Exp (Yes, 1/20th SS)
Second: (IMG_3322): Manual Mode, F16, 200 ISO, 1/200
Third (IMG_3323): Manual Mode, F8, 200 ISO, 1/200

Comments?

Thanks


Looks like a bracketed series! Sure bracketing was turned off?

Reply
Nov 2, 2022 08:37:00   #
Lucian Loc: From Wales, living in Ohio
 
tradio wrote:
#2 & 3 have the same settings but totally different results.....What about exposure compensation...?


Ummm, no they do not have the same settings. Take a look at the aperture, f8 and f16 are waaayyy different to each other, hence the different results.

Reply
 
 
Nov 2, 2022 08:41:10   #
BebuLamar
 
When you use the sunny 16 rule then bracketing or EC don't apply.

Reply
Nov 2, 2022 09:10:02   #
billnikon Loc: Pennsylvania/Ohio/Florida/Maui/Oregon/Vermont
 
DeanS wrote:
Can’t figure out why the “Sunny 16 Rule” doesn’t work so well on my 5D/IV. The lens is Canon 70-200 F4 L/II.

Conditions: Bright, sunny, mostly clear sky. All three shots SOOC.

First (IMG_3321): A Priority, F16, 200 ISO, 1/20 Exp (Yes, 1/20th SS)
Second: (IMG_3322): Manual Mode, F16, 200 ISO, 1/200
Third (IMG_3323): Manual Mode, F8, 200 ISO, 1/200

Comments?

Thanks


Why?
With today's exposure systems why even mess with a 19th century system.
I photograph for effect, either manual or aperture priority.
Too many variables in life to be stuck in the past.
Relax and let your camera reside in manual or aperture, you'll enjoy life better.

Reply
Nov 2, 2022 09:23:25   #
jerryc41 Loc: Catskill Mts of NY
 
Maybe your camera doesn't like rules. : )

I prefer to use electronics over those old "rule of thumb" suggestions.

Reply
Nov 2, 2022 09:38:20   #
CHG_CANON Loc: the Windy City
 
AndyT wrote:
Whenever I've used the f/16 rule, it has always been underexposed so I always open up one stop.


THIS ^^^^^^ THIS ^^^^^^ THIS ^^^^^^ THIS ^^^^^

Reply
Page <prev 2 of 8 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.