Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
Nikon D7200 vs Nikon d750
Page <prev 2 of 3 next>
Oct 10, 2022 11:44:02   #
stogieboy Loc: Marlboro, NY
 
I upgraded from the D3200 to the D750 after taking an overnight workshop for astrophotography and light painting. In order to get the shots I wanted, I had to leave the shutter open for a long time, or, take multiple shorter exposures and blend together in post. I was not happy with either process, as the longer exposures created the hot pixels, but I also got a lot of ugly borders on my shots, likely either hot pixels, or the combination of experimenting with really long exposures caused the image degradation.

Having moved to the D750, those issues don't occur anymore, and I couldn't be happier with the move.

As was pointed out, it can be costly to upgrade to an FX system, but unless you plan to keep the D7200, you could always sell that kit, and help offset the costs. I had considered keeping the D3200, but decided against it once I saw the results I got from going FX.

Reply
Oct 10, 2022 12:44:08   #
PhotomanTom
 
PGHSHOOTER wrote:
I am looking for advice I currently have a Nikon 7200 but thinking of doing other types of photography ie Astrophotography. I am thinking of buying a Nikon d750 but am confused on the pros and cons. Lens 24mps vs 10. Full frame vs cropped.
Should I upgrade to the d750 or
Should I just stay with the 7200?


I have both, am satisfied with both. I use the D7200 with my 200-500, 80-200 Nikkor telephoto lenses when I need a little extra “reach”. My D750 is the goto camera for most things and lately astrophotography. All my lenses are FX.

Started Astrophotography with the 14-24 on a tripod, moved to a tracking mount (iOptron Sky Guider Pro) and have used all my lenses (24-70, 105, 85, 50) with the D750. Very satisfied with the results. I did move up to auto guiding with the tracking mount to enable longer exposures I’ve used up to 6 minute exposures and tested up to 10 minutes but that was with excellent “seeing” conditions. “Cloudy Nights” an astro forum has great info for beginners and they have answered all of my dumb questions.

I’ve since moved on to a real telescope and good mount (expensive) but still use the D750 to capture images. As soon as I truly learn how to use all the new equipment I probably will move up to a dedicated astro cooled camera. Have to give the checkbook a rest for a while, Good cooled astro cameras are expensive. Will be trying my D7200 in place of the D750 on the telescope soon. Hoping it will give a little extra “reach” for galaxies and less cropping than the D750.

So, to answer your original question, Yes you can get decent results with the D7200 and D750. Can you get better results with more modern equipment? Sure for more money newer camera’s generally give better results. If you’re independently wealthy, go for it. The D750 will require FX lenses to reach its potential so that means more money spent. If you’re not ready to purchase FX lenses, the D7200 and DX lenses will serve you well with a small penalty at really wide angles. You can’t use DX lenses on a D750 without serious vignetting.

Reply
Oct 10, 2022 13:11:14   #
Artcameraman Loc: Springfield NH
 
Astrophotography...Get yourself a D800e, it's made for Astrophotography.

Reply
 
 
Oct 10, 2022 13:19:57   #
PhotomanTom
 
But, it’s not cooled. For $250 it’s possible to modify any DSLR to convert it to an Astrophotography camera. It’s the cooling of a true Astrophotography dedicated camera that gives amazing results.

Reply
Oct 10, 2022 13:35:03   #
nealbralley Loc: Kansas
 
Both the D7200 and D750 are still excellent cameras. The D750 is a workhorse, and it will serve you as well as any modern camera in most every application. Certainly, you will need to use full frame lenses on the D750 as it is a full frame camera. Highest shutter speed is only 1/4000 of a second, (but when you began your photography with an Argus C3, as I did, that camera max'd out at 1/300 of a second), no sweat! ISO and aperture can take care of the slower shutter speeds. You can stop Superman with 1/4000 of a second!

I have really found only marginal improvements in the newer, more expensive cameras. Regardless of what you shoot, the D750 will serve your needs very well. It doesn't matter what others tell you, if you are just a regular shooter, you don't need a "bazillion" megapixels! If you view your images on a computer, a phone, or print to say 8.5"x11" you will have zero issues with a 24mp camera, none! Put a decent lens on that D750 camera and you can still absolutely be "professional grade"!

Photographic success boils down to this: in whose hands is the camera? It is the light and location, the photographer's skill, the choice and quality of the lens, and lastly -- way lastly -- it is the camera that matters. Can most photographers take their Nikon Z7II or Z9 and out-shoot Ansel Adams, probably not! Don't worry about a D750 being six or seven years old; it isn't an issue. No one can tell which decently capable camera shot a great image after the fact.

Reply
Oct 10, 2022 13:37:18   #
Artcameraman Loc: Springfield NH
 
Ice!

Reply
Oct 10, 2022 14:00:51   #
Judy795
 
Get a D750 and a FX 20 mm f/1.8 lens for one of the resale sites and you will be set

Reply
 
 
Oct 10, 2022 15:08:50   #
jeffkempton
 
I shoot astro with my D7100 and a single axis tracker. I get decent results with this less than ideal rig. I would like to get a FF but I would not upgrade to another DSLR or mirrorless for astro.





Reply
Oct 10, 2022 15:34:21   #
nealbralley Loc: Kansas
 
Your images are superb. No one can tell what camera, or camera format, you used for those shots! Well done! Why? Because you are a good photographer!

Reply
Oct 10, 2022 17:38:01   #
jeffkempton
 
Thank you Neal.

Reply
Oct 10, 2022 18:40:14   #
mikeroetex Loc: Lafayette, LA
 
larryepage wrote:
Good morning. I've mostly left the forum, but just happened to see your post and the array of replies. I have and use several DX and FX Nikon cameras, and have done a considerable amount of night sky photography. You can find a few of my posts on this site.

There are basically two types of astrophotography. One which is currently popular is wide angle or panoramic photography of the sky. The other is photography through a telescope (or long telephoto lens). The second almost always requires a tracking mount, the first can use a tracker but much more often will not.

I am not expert in telescope photography and will therefore not discuss what equipment you need, except to say that it can become quite esoteric. For skyscape photography, an appropriate camera and lens, a stable tripod, a remote release, and an understanding of the seasonal changes in the night sky are enough to get you started. Best results will be achieved with a camera with high resolution and good low light performance, and a good, relatively fast lens. Typical exposures will vary somewhat, but it is very common to be working at ISOs of 4,000-6,000 and shutter opening times of 25-40 seconds with a f/2.8 lens. You will quickly learn to appreciate shooting with a camera with 35Mp or more.

Not sure what other responders' experience level is, but I have attended several night-sky classes and shot with several groups. I've never seen a D750 being used. The most successful results seem to some from those folks using a D810 (36Mp) or D850 (45 Mp). Even though the D750 and D780 have quite good low-light performance, they fall short of ideal resolving capability. Your targets are infinitesimally small points of light, and there are quite literally millions of them. This is one of a very few cases where resolution really does matter. While I have no doubt that you could get results with a D750, I'm also pretty confident that you would pretty quickly become dissatisfied with them. If your budget will stand it, you might want to consider a nice used D810 or D850 instead. Tons of lightly used ones have been dumped on the market by folks stampeding to mirrorless cameras.

Eventually, someone is going to suggest a Z7 or some other mirrorless camera. There is no doubt that you could capture a beautiful image with one of these cameras. The problem is the risk that the EVF could upset your night vision and require you to interrupt what you are doing for 15 minutes or more to recover it. I have yet to receive a reliable report from anyone who has been happy using any EVF camera at night.

For best results, you are going to need a good lens. Despite what you read here, the standard is the Nikkor 14-24mm f/2.8. There are also tons of these on thee market being sold by folks who thought they had to have one for landscapes until they found that they didn't.
Good morning. I've mostly left the forum, but jus... (show quote)

Youmight find this article beneficial, it lead me to buy my Z6.

https://www.nationalparksatnight.com/blog/2019/9/28/the-z-6-is-the-best-camera-for-night-photography?

Reply
 
 
Oct 10, 2022 18:41:00   #
mikeroetex Loc: Lafayette, LA
 
Judy795 wrote:
Get a D750 and a FX 20 mm f/1.8 lens for one of the resale sites and you will be set



Reply
Oct 10, 2022 19:44:29   #
Bill_de Loc: US
 
jeffkempton wrote:
I shoot astro with my D7100 and a single axis tracker. I get decent results with this less than ideal rig. I would like to get a FF but I would not upgrade to another DSLR or mirrorless for astro.


I'm surprised and very impressed! Very nicely done!!!

---

Reply
Oct 10, 2022 22:57:49   #
b top gun
 
I still use my D7100 on occasion; I especially like taking it to a zoo when I mount my 70-200 f/2.8 Nikkor on it. I made the leap from the D7100 to the D850, had to borrow a couple of FX lens until I could afford the FX I wanted for the D850. I had a Z6 II for less than 2 weeks; really did not care for its ergonomics and other annoyances like having to use the FTZ adapter. Returned the Z6 II to B&H and opted for a D780 because of its video capability which is supposed to be equal to the Z6 II; and I have FX lenses and also use older Nikkor manual focus primes on both the D850 and D780, with nice results.

Reply
Oct 11, 2022 10:19:12   #
stogieboy Loc: Marlboro, NY
 
mikeroetex wrote:


These guys are my heroes. They used the D750 several years ago, and I attended one of their overnight workshops in 2016 that led me to purchase my D750. I think they have since mostly moved to mirrorless, but their fundamentals are the same.

Reply
Page <prev 2 of 3 next>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.