Durango vs Las Vegas
Oct 10, 2022 14:49:41 #
This shoot I experimented some.
Now get this I went completely with what your not supposed to do, but just for fun I tried using my D4 with 200-500 5.6 vr. On some shots otherwise D4 with a sunny sky. Night shots 70-200 2.8. I wouldn't use the 200-500 at night anymore.
Now get this I went completely with what your not supposed to do, but just for fun I tried using my D4 with 200-500 5.6 vr. On some shots otherwise D4 with a sunny sky. Night shots 70-200 2.8. I wouldn't use the 200-500 at night anymore.
(Download)
(Download)
70-200 2.8
(Download)
200-500 5.6 iso 10,000
(Download)
200-500 5.6 vr. iso 10,000 1/1250
(Download)
300 2.8
(Download)
(Download)
(Download)
(Download)
(Download)
Oct 10, 2022 19:51:11 #
You might not choose to do so again, but I thought you did a good job with getting the details out using the 200-500 @10k. Looks as if it is pretty workable with the static subject. I bet you had a bit of work to do on the moving shots!
Oct 10, 2022 22:07:54 #
rcorne001 wrote:
You might not choose to do so again, but I thought you did a good job with getting the details out using the 200-500 @10k. Looks as if it is pretty workable with the static subject. I bet you had a bit of work to do on the moving shots!
For sure with the work, I just thought what the heck let's see what happens. Like I said after dark I won't use it again. At 5.6 the noise is very bad and even with Denoise hard to make it better.
Oct 10, 2022 23:54:46 #
rickberns
Loc: Conroe, Texas
Jules Karney wrote:
This shoot I experimented some.
Now get this I went completely with what your not supposed to do, but just for fun I tried using my D4 with 200-500 5.6 vr. On some shots otherwise D4 with a sunny sky. Night shots 70-200 2.8. I wouldn't use the 200-500 at night anymore.
Now get this I went completely with what your not supposed to do, but just for fun I tried using my D4 with 200-500 5.6 vr. On some shots otherwise D4 with a sunny sky. Night shots 70-200 2.8. I wouldn't use the 200-500 at night anymore.
That's the beauty of photography, you can step outside your comfy zone and try different settings, gear under varying conditions and salvage some great captures like you did. Enjoyed this set of football photo's Jules.
Rick
Oct 11, 2022 07:26:30 #
david vt
Loc: Vermont
Nice shots. I really like #4. While it is just a static shot, it conveys emotion and the hard work due to the scuffed up helmet. Nice
Oct 11, 2022 07:48:23 #
Jules Karney wrote:
This shoot I experimented some.
Now get this I went completely with what your not supposed to do, but just for fun I tried using my D4 with 200-500 5.6 vr. On some shots otherwise D4 with a sunny sky. Night shots 70-200 2.8. I wouldn't use the 200-500 at night anymore.
Now get this I went completely with what your not supposed to do, but just for fun I tried using my D4 with 200-500 5.6 vr. On some shots otherwise D4 with a sunny sky. Night shots 70-200 2.8. I wouldn't use the 200-500 at night anymore.
There are no words for your amazing shots. Love it. I like the color guard. I shoot them all the time. The bad part is the flags usually cover all their faces. I guess there is nothing you could do about that. Thanks BE SAFE!!
Tom
Oct 11, 2022 11:28:09 #
tshift wrote:
There are no words for your amazing shots. Love it. I like the color guard. I shoot them all the time. The bad part is the flags usually cover all their faces. I guess there is nothing you could do about that. Thanks BE SAFE!!
Tom
Tom
Yep the flags are usually in the faces. Just to see our flag hoisted above I just have to take a shot. I have tried from the side, still no help with the faces. I will practice I promise.
Oct 11, 2022 12:36:46 #
Jules Karney wrote:
Yep the flags are usually in the faces. Just to see our flag hoisted above I just have to take a shot. I have tried from the side, still no help with the faces. I will practice I promise.
I probably don't have one good honor guard photo with faces. Too bad as I love it and them. Thanks BE SAFE!!
Tom
Oct 11, 2022 21:09:39 #
Jules - Superb shots. Query was # 6 2.8 at night ? You really filled the frame nicely ! I agree about the 5.6 200-500 at night but how do you get the reach with the 70-200? Patiently wait for the action to come to you ? Thanks. Paul
Oct 11, 2022 21:36:33 #
pnittoly wrote:
Jules - Superb shots. Query was # 6 2.8 at night ? You really filled the frame nicely ! I agree about the 5.6 200-500 at night but how do you get the reach with the 70-200? Patiently wait for the action to come to you ? Thanks. Paul
Oct 11, 2022 21:37:44 #
I must be patient and wait for the action, runner, quarterback, etc. I just had to know what the 200-500 would or more important what the lens can't do. Great lens for during the day, love it for that.
Be well,
Jules
Be well,
Jules
Oct 11, 2022 22:14:09 #
pnittoly wrote:
Jules - Superb shots. Query was # 6 2.8 at night ? You really filled the frame nicely ! I agree about the 5.6 200-500 at night but how do you get the reach with the 70-200? Patiently wait for the action to come to you ? Thanks. Paul
Paul this shot was with the 70-22 2.8 I did not crop maybe one quarter inch on each end.and that's it.
Oct 18, 2022 09:20:32 #
Oct 18, 2022 21:51:25 #
Thanks Jules. Great capture. Im hoping to get outside this weekend for a daylight game ! Im going to experiment with the 200-500 and the 70-200. Paul
Oct 18, 2022 22:20:31 #
pnittoly wrote:
Thanks Jules. Great capture. Im hoping to get outside this weekend for a daylight game ! Im going to experiment with the 200-500 and the 70-200. Paul
I like the 200-500 during the day. Very nice lens. Good shooting Paul and have fun.
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.