rlv567 wrote:
I bought a very inexpensive Canon all-in-one printer over 6 years ago for home use. It always has performed extremely well!!! I sometimes use it several days running for a number of prints - or maybe scans, but frequently it's 2 or 3 months between uses for anything. I always have used Canon ink and have not ever had even one problem!!! I am totally sold on Canon products! (My cameras are Canon, also.) (And the printer does a nice job on color photograph prints, with no calibration of anything, ever!!!)
Loren - in Beautiful Baguio City
I bought a very inexpensive Canon all-in-one print... (
show quote)
That's fine. I used Canon gear (and Nikons and 12 other camera brands) off and on for years. It all did the job. If you like the results, it's probably because of the sRGB standard that does a "decent*" job of matching consumer monitors to consumer cameras and consumer printers, so long as no one changes settings away from factory defaults. Canon Print Studio Pro is especially good for folks who want pro quality prints from their PIXMA Pro printers.
*"Decent" may be defined differently, depending on your standards.
I've come from a photo lab environment where we had to match over 78 devices to each other, so customers would not ask questions like, "Why does CocaCola Red look suspiciously like Corvette Red?" and "Why does this canvas print look so mute compared to this print on cotton rag paper?" or "Why do these plastic student ID cards have purple backgrounds when we know the background is blue?"
We calibrated and profiled nine color correction department monitors to match each other and a "master" printer, and calibrated and profiled the other printers to match the master printer as close as their technologies (silver halide, Xerographic, dye sublimation, ink jet) would allow. That saved us hundreds of thousands of dollars in wasted labor, materials, opportunity costs, remakes, etc.
We had a few Canon Desktop photo printers in offices. They did work great, but there was one that kept clogging black and yellow inks. Canon took it back.
We had an industrial strength 44" Epson 9600 that ran 20 hours/day, 6 days weekly. It never clogged until the purchasing agent got a "deal" on off-brand inks. It clogged a day after we started using the cheap inks. After a head replacement and switching back to OEM inks, it lasted three more years until we replaced it with a much better, newer Epson.
I have a two-year-old EcoTank 4700 Epson at home that works fine, so long as we keep it busy. Let it sit for a couple of weeks, and it might need a head cleaning. The problem is, we don't print enough to use the ink before it goes bad, so although the ink is cheap (relatively!), having the deep tanks presents challenges of its own. (I need to go make some prints, soon!)
All ink has chemicals in it that keep it liquid. Eventually, the liquid components evaporate, leaving a solid...