gwilliams6 wrote:
No it is actual MTF-Standard testing that is objective reporting. But I am not surprised with your latest babbling.
Ooooooooh ... "Objective MTF Standard Testing" ! Just as stated, meaningless out of context "reportage", the lifeblood of typical UHH "expertise", minimal relation, if any, to actual users results.
Thank you for the info. I read and wonder how good/reliable are those assessments/opinions. He covered hundreds lens - based on others' testing?
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.