Tokina 11- 16 mm keeps me happy.
Urnst wrote:
Does anyone have any? Thanks
The Sigma 10-20mm f/3.5 EX is a fantastic lens. Here are a few sample shots.
I'll also endorse the Tokina 11-16 which I use with my d7200. It's s 2.8 and sharp.
Urnst wrote:
Does anyone have any? Thanks
I picked up a like new Nikon 10-20mm from MPB for my 7200 Cheap and pretty sharp. I like it. Check out the reviews
jno wrote:
For single focal length, manual look at 7Artisans. Inexpensive and good images.
Im getting excellent results from Laowa, 7Artisans and TT Artisans lenses but have no specific model to recommend cuz none of mine are for ASPC SLRs. I can only say that their products are very much worth investigating if you are able to use them. The challenge acoarst is the D3400 itself.
DeanS
Loc: Capital City area of North Carolina
Lots of recs for the Tokina. I don’t have that lens, but I do have the 100mm f2.8 macro, excellent results, if that is relevant to your search.
DeanS wrote:
Lots of recs for the Tokina. I don’t have that lens, but I do have the 100mm f2.8 macro, excellent results, if that is relevant to your search.
100mm could be considered almost an ultrawide for 5x7, but really for 8x10. I doubt that your Tokina has a shutter so that pretty much takes it off the table.
DeanS
Loc: Capital City area of North Carolina
User ID wrote:
100mm could be considered almost an ultrawide for 5x7, but really for 8x10. I doubt that your Tokina has a shutter so that pretty much takes it off the table.
Not recommendibg this as a choice, just attesting to the quality of the Tokina lens.
User ID wrote:
The 10-24 DX 3.5-4.5 G rocks my boat. Its a fully coupled OEM zoom. Theres a new cheaper version but I havent tried that cuz Im happy with the original. If you go for the original your only likely complaint might be its size. Everything else about it is top shelf.
10-24 covers all imaginable wide angle needs in one lens, so its size is readily forgivable cuz it replaces three other lenses. Weight isnt bad. I use it on a Sony that is smaller than your Nikon.
I also use unusual fully manual lenses. Excellent results but unsure about you using them on a D3400.
The 10-24 DX 3.5-4.5 G rocks my boat. Its a fully ... (
show quote)
I have and sometimes use the 10-24 and agree it is great. But if shopping for DX I’d get the AFP 10-20.
Reading the descriptions of the various ultra-wides in this article, it struck me as curious that most of them, except the Nikon 10-20, do not have any sort of VR. Out of curiosity, why is VR omitted in most of the wide-angles mentioned?
Trapper1
kymarto
Loc: Portland OR and Milan Italy
Sigma 8-16mm. As sharp as any, low CA, good work against the light, and the widest of all. Cons are: relatively slow (f4.5-5.6) and bulbous front element, making it hard to attach filters, but optically great.
Urnst
Loc: Brownsville, Texas
Seabastes wrote:
I have the Nikon 10-24 almost new and I no longer use it so will sell it for
$300 pus $25.00 for shipping. It cost me $1,080 .00 when I bought it several years ago.
I am interested in buying your lens.
IDguy wrote:
I have and sometimes use the 10-24 and agree it is great. But if shopping for DX I’d get the AFP 10-20.
If forced to buy it brand new that makes good sense. OTOH the 10-24 is generally available used for about $400 ... not a big leap. Acoarst a *used* 10-20 P is a great buy on a tight budget.
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.