Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
Shooting with an SLR...
Page <<first <prev 3 of 4 next>
Aug 20, 2022 20:23:01   #
DaveyDitzer Loc: Western PA
 
What about you hogs. Do you ever return to the SLR world?[/quote]

I return to the SLR world to shoot some B/W which prints I know will stand the test of time and need no updated software to handle and view.

Reply
Aug 20, 2022 20:30:18   #
User ID
 
DaveyDitzer wrote:
What about you hogs. Do you ever return to the SLR world?


I return to the SLR world to shoot some B/W which prints I know will stand the test of time and need no updated software to handle and view.[/quote]
Good plan. When your heirs throw them out, theyll be good as new, unlike digital prints whose code can be corrupted by solar flares or nuclear holocaust.

Reply
Aug 20, 2022 20:35:54   #
DaveyDitzer Loc: Western PA
 
Guess these photos will be the first thing i grab when the SHTF:)

Reply
 
 
Aug 20, 2022 20:41:30   #
burkphoto Loc: High Point, NC
 
BebuLamar wrote:
These days I shoot only slide films (I no longer have my color darkroom). It's kind SOOC. Yeah you can have slide film pushed or pulled but for me these days it makes no sense. Back in the old days I pushed film because I need to get the pictures when it's dark. Today if I need to take such pictures I would definitely use digital. I only use 100 speed film and no push. Being the slides and I project them (I don't scan them) and it's kind of straight out of the camera for me. It's kind of fun that way.
These days I shoot only slide films (I no longer h... (show quote)


I have an Ektagraphic III AT projector, with Apollo zoom lens on it, that I haven't used in 30 years.

Yes slides were like JPEGs. You had to set up the camera for the end result.

I have been copying all my old slides and negatives to digital files so I can print and share them. I use my Lumix GH4 with 30mm macro lens.

Here are a few:

Tri-X negative processed in Negative Lab Pro Plug-in for Lightroom Classic
Tri-X negative processed in Negative Lab Pro Plug-...
(Download)

Kodachrome 64 of Tiki Hut at Disney
Kodachrome 64 of Tiki Hut at Disney...
(Download)

Kodachrome 64 slide from 1983 of Spaceship Earth at Disney's EPCOT
Kodachrome 64 slide from 1983 of Spaceship Earth a...
(Download)

Reply
Aug 20, 2022 23:40:26   #
Chris F. Loc: San Francisco
 
đź‘Ťđź‘Ť

Reply
Aug 21, 2022 10:50:14   #
ronpier Loc: Poland Ohio
 
jack schade wrote:
I went back to experience film again a few years ago. Had pretty much the same experience you did. Never again.

Jack


I went digital in 2005, never went back to film and never even had the last roll developed.

Reply
Aug 21, 2022 11:26:02   #
Bill 45
 
First up I never left the SLR world. Saturday was at a flea market that have 50+ dealers. The camera I use was a Pentax ME Super with 50mm Pentax 1:2 lens with a Tamron-F tele-converter 2X. Film was 400 speed film. Have no problem in getting the pictures I wanted with people walking all rounded me. So what is the beef?

Reply
 
 
Aug 21, 2022 14:20:01   #
drmike99 Loc: Fairfield Connecticut
 
BebuLamar wrote:
These days I shoot only slide films (I no longer have my color darkroom). It's kind SOOC. Yeah you can have slide film pushed or pulled but for me these days it makes no sense. Back in the old days I pushed film because I need to get the pictures when it's dark. Today if I need to take such pictures I would definitely use digital. I only use 100 speed film and no push. Being the slides and I project them (I don't scan them) and it's kind of straight out of the camera for me. It's kind of fun that way.
These days I shoot only slide films (I no longer h... (show quote)

My Nikon F6 is loaded (usually) with Ektachrome 100 and I have (still) many empty and available Carousel trays. For B&W I use my Nikon FE which is lighter. The F6 is Nikon’s flagship film SLR, has a similar workflow to my DSLR (soon to be sold D7100) and the heft of its legendary parent, the original Nikon F Photomic FTN (which I NEVER should have sold). The D7100 is being sold along with about half a dozen DX lenses because in my digital world I haven’t looked back since buying (on a GAS attack) a Z6. The 7100 has lived on the shelf ever since. The handful of FX lenses I had bought for it have been repurposed to the F6 or to the Z6 with FTZ adapter.

Reply
Aug 21, 2022 14:46:29   #
RickeyH
 
I never left the SLR world or the medium format world. I enjoy both format's, digital and film, lean more toward film but enjoy it all.

Reply
Aug 21, 2022 15:13:15   #
delder Loc: Maryland
 
burkphoto:

You hit the nail on the head with sharing digital vs slides especially!
How many people I can share a jpg with today compared to a slide IN the tray.

Reply
Aug 21, 2022 15:20:00   #
JD750 Loc: SoCal
 
rmalarz wrote:
JD750, I see the photograph and get the gratification before I even touch the shutter release.
--Bob

I like that!

Reply
 
 
Aug 21, 2022 16:17:05   #
Chris F. Loc: San Francisco
 
I've gone completely digital and will continue on that path. Mistakes are easier to correct or just delete and it doesn't cost anything for film and developing. Best of luck with the film SLR.

Chris

Reply
Aug 21, 2022 17:18:17   #
burkphoto Loc: High Point, NC
 
delder wrote:
burkphoto:

You hit the nail on the head with sharing digital vs slides especially!
How many people I can share a jpg with today compared to a slide IN the tray.


That's why bits beat atoms! The virtual world can view digital media at will. Only the producer can show a slide show (or at least, it can be in only as many places as you made expensive duplicates for it).

Slides are great, but dragging out the projector and screen instead of using a phone, tablet, computer, or smartTV seems a bit inconvenient. Of course, I may be shell shocked by years of professional multi-image AV show production (3- to 15-projector shows were my specialty). It was fun in my 20s... the 1980s.

Reply
Aug 21, 2022 18:36:50   #
nervous2 Loc: Provo, Utah
 
Guyserman wrote:
is a real drag. I picked up a cheap Kalimar K-90 in a yard sale. Lens is a Sears zoom marked with 1.4.0 (don't know what that means.) Aperture is marked from f4 to f22 but there are two clicks larger than f4 - maybe f3.5. Zoom range is 80 - 200mm and zoom mechanism is internal.

I bought a 36 exposure roll of b&w film to try it out. What a DUMB move. I should have got a 20 exposure roll. After using an M4/3 camera, man was that thing heavy. I always forgot to wind the film until I was ready to take the next shot. I had to take it down from my face, wind the film, check the exposure, focus and composition all over again (it had zoom creep.) I finally got to where I could change the aperture without taking it down.

I managed 14 snaps before I tired out. I don't know how I ever used one of these from the 1950s through the 1990s. I guess I was stronger and also I never had a lens longer the 135mm. I know this: I sure do love my micro four thirds MILC.

What about you hogs. Do you ever return to the SLR world?
is a real drag. I picked up a cheap Kalimar K-90 i... (show quote)


I have a Nikon F2 Photomic that I love to use. My Nikon Photomic Ftn needs a bit of repair.

Reply
Aug 21, 2022 18:43:33   #
coolhanduke Loc: Redondo Beach, CA
 
No, maybe if I still owned my photolab.
When Nikon came out with the D3, that’s when I switched to the dark side.
J shoot too many “experimental” photos to spend on developing and printing them just to toss.
But film is coming back I hear.

Reply
Page <<first <prev 3 of 4 next>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.