Sorry, I oversimplified it. I assumed the f-stops would need to be the same and subject distance and focal points would need to be the same.
Gdelvecc wrote:
Sorry, I oversimplified it. I assumed the f-stops would need to be the same and subject distance and focal points would need to be the same.
Most of us understood that you meant to include that.
For an in-depth look at the subject see the
DEPTH OF FIELD CALCULATOR at Cambridge in Colour. Click on "Show advanced" to see all of the things that can affect DOF.
The first three variables are usually left out of the discussion.
TriX
Loc: Raleigh, NC
selmslie wrote:
Most of us understood that you meant to include that.
For an in-depth look at the subject see the
DEPTH OF FIELD CALCULATOR at Cambridge in Colour. Click on "Show advanced" to see all of the things that can affect DOF.
The first three variables are usually left out of the discussion.
Exactly right. That’s why my previous post said “acceptable circle of confusion”.
Has been mentioned on UHH before, Optic design for ZOOM lenses is FAR more complex than a fixed focus lens.
Lots of moving parts and interrelationships between elements in ZOOM lens design.
Easier to optimize a single focal length lens.
They should be. In fact, depth of field is not affected by focal length by any real significance.
--Bob
Gdelvecc wrote:
Is the depth of field the same for a 35mm prime lens as a 17-70mm zoom set at 35mm??? Thanks in advance…
TriX wrote:
Yes, assuming the same aperture, distance to subject and acceptable CoC (related to sensor size). And regarding CoC/sensor size, before someone objects:
Sensor size affects DOF in counterintuitive ways. Because the circle of confusion is directly tied to the sensor size, decreasing the size of the sensor while holding focal length and aperture constant will decrease the depth of field (by the crop factor). The resulting image however will have a different field of view. If the focal length is altered to maintain the field of view, the change in focal length will counter the decrease of DOF from the smaller sensor and increase the depth of field (also by the crop factor). Per Wiki:
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Depth_of_fieldYes, assuming the same aperture, distance to subje... (
show quote)
Sensor size ? What about body color ?
Sensor size does NOT matter cuz it is not a variable. Likewise body color. The only variable in question is the lenses. The OP presents only one variable.
TriX
Loc: Raleigh, NC
User ID wrote:
Sensor size ? What about body color ?
Sensor size does NOT matter cuz it is not a variable. Likewise body color. The only variable in question is the lenses. The OP presents only one variable.
CoC IS a variable and sensor size IS a key component of CoC. You need to read the Wiki link I published above (or just note that sensor size is a component in any DOF calculator - surely you know that - photography 101).
TriX wrote:
CoC IS a variable and sensor size IS a key component of CoC. You need to read the Wiki link I published above (or just note that sensor size is a component in any DOF calculator - surely you know that - photography 101).
You can recite all the science you wish. But if you read the OP there is only one variable. Mentioning variables not in question is pointless. A lens swap is the sole variation in question.
TriX
Loc: Raleigh, NC
User ID wrote:
You can recite all the science you wish. But if you read the OP there is only one variable. Mentioning variables not in question is pointless. A lens swap is the sole variation in question.
You got a problem with science?
User ID wrote:
ROTFLMFAO
Imaginary differences defined by geeks. Best approach is to unsee it.
As the popular saying goes, "It's like a train wreck. You can't look away."
User ID wrote:
Sensor size does NOT matter cuz it is not a variable. ... The OP presents only one variable.
At a minimum there are four variables: sensor size, aperture, focal length and focus distance.
That leave out print (image) size, viewing distance and visual acuity - three more.
That's seven variables. Any of them can have a different value. That's why we call them variables.
Even if you assume any of them remains constant all seven are still variables.
Gdelvecc wrote:
Is the depth of field the same for a 35mm prime lens as a 17-70mm zoom set at 35mm??? Thanks in advance…
If all settings are the same, yes. Quality, which is what some are talking about, may be different, but 35 is 35 is 35.
Gdelvecc wrote:
Is the depth of field the same for a 35mm prime lens as a 17-70mm zoom set at 35mm??? Thanks in advance…
Strictly speaking in perfect world and in theory YES - in the real/practical world there can be a very small variance which should be mostly un-noticed.
.
There are DOF calculators/apps. I would check them
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.