Fotoartist Loc: Detroit, Michigan

You proclaim your mindless zealotry by spouting the 97% talking point lie. You should get more up to speed with your so-called theory of climate change. That claim has been debunked as nonsense for many many years now.

How is pollution defined? CO2 is Not pollution. It is plant food that the Brazilian rain forests need to keep growing. CO2 has become the biggest politicized lie of science since the advent of 72 genders.

dennis2146 Loc: Eastern Idaho

I suspect the entire country would at some point welcome to be away from fossil fuels. But the problem IS, America is nowhere near ready to do that yet. Perhaps in 25+ years we would be when some other WORKABLE form of energy is available. But that is not now even though the Left is doing its best to push that upon us. America is not filled with clouds of pollution as it was during the 1960's in big cities such as Los Angeles. Our air now is pretty clean and certainly is livable. AFTER some other form of energy is found that is not the dangerous batteries now found in automobiles I am all for getting away from fossil fuels. But until that day comes these fossil fuels should be used right here in America. America should also go back to energy independent as we were headed under President Trump. With oil beneath our feet why on earth would America ever depend upon foreign countries to keep our vehicles filled with fuel. We could have our own cheap gasoline and natural gas. Why is the Left so against that? Why is our President going to Saudi Arabia and begging for more oil? We HAVE oil here already.

Dennis

Haenzel Loc: South Holland, The Netherlands

Even if it's 80%..doesn't matter. Don't use the assumption of wrong figures as a claim climate change is not happening. That's too easy..

I didn't speak about pollution, although this is a problem as well.
What I know and what I've learned 40 years ago is that CO2 is adding to global warming due to the green house effect. I can give you plenty examples of proof the earth is warming up rapidly. Can you give me some proof that contradicts this, that temperatures are lowering or at least stable? I don't think so...

Facts are facts. For fairy tales you have to visit the "Efteling". (Very nice entertainment park by the way..)

Captryan Loc: Massachusetts

Where does that 97% number come from? I've seen it used before, but never seen a link to a reference or study.

Fotoartist Loc: Detroit, Michigan

Perfect. Your information comes from 40 years ago, just 6 years after scientists were telling us that "global cooling" would doom the world. Maybe you should take into account how that hot yellow ball in the sky goes through cycles.

You say, "Even if it's 80%...", you are so sucked in. It is not even 40% of scientists who believe this political science and that is because of Liberal politics and financial incentives. The "greenhouse effect" for climate change has been debunked by most serious scientists. There simply is no proof that CO2 is causing climate change. And there is convincing evidence that it is not.

Haenzel Loc: South Holland, The Netherlands

I know all about the sun's 11 years cycle. I also know temperatures would lower during / after the latest solar minimum. You guessed it....it didn't.
Where is your source only 40 % of specialized scientists confirm global warming? Where is your source CO2 is not adding to global warming? Believe me, I'll take those sources down, one finger in the nose...

srg

News Flash!
Stupidity will stop global warming in its tracks.
Buy North Face stock now.

Fotoartist Loc: Detroit, Michigan

First, it's incumbent upon you to prove your phony 97% figure that you have relied on for so many years without checking it out and which has no basis in fact.

My source for the non-effect of increased CO2 in causing global warming comes from the Vostock Ice Cores. The evidence shows a rise in CO2 comes AFTER a warming period, not before and certainly doesn't cause it, look it up.

I’m always troubled by arguments that begin, “Everybody agrees…” or “Everyone knows…” or, "The science is settled". In fact, there is a good deal of dissent in the scientific world about the theory of man-made global warming. A large (and growing) segment of those who study such things are questioning some of the basic premises of the theory. And you don't hear about them in the main stream media or even on Google. Why not? Again, this is a big deal, and we should have the best information and opinion from the best minds. Why no honest and televised debate from both sides?

SuneBonobo Loc: Maryland

https://www.wsj.com/articles/joseph-bast-and-roy-spencer-the-myth-of-the-climate-change-97-1401145980

That 97% nonsense has been debunked for years.

Haenzel Loc: South Holland, The Netherlands

I know the theory, however it is not as black and white as it seems. I quote:

"This statement does not tell the whole story. The initial changes in temperature during this period are explained by changes in the Earth’s orbit around the sun, which affects the amount of seasonal sunlight reaching the Earth’s surface. In the case of warming, the lag between temperature and CO2 is explained as follows: as ocean temperatures rise, oceans release CO2 into the atmosphere. In turn, this release amplifies the warming trend, leading to yet more CO2 being released. In other words, increasing CO2 levels become both the cause and effect of further warming. This positive feedback is necessary to trigger the shifts between glacials and interglacials as the effect of orbital changes is too weak to cause such variation. Additional positive feedbacks which play an important role in this process include other greenhouse gases, and changes in ice sheet cover and vegetation patterns."

I have no doubt increasing CO2 levels (and other gasses) are disturbing the planet. The green house effect can very easily be explained and reproduced.

Haenzel Loc: South Holland, The Netherlands

I'm all in!!!

thom w Loc: San Jose, CA

CO2 absorbs infrared energy. Nitrogen and oxygen do not. So it makes sense that more CO2 would increase the temperature of at least the atmosphere.

slocumeddie Loc: Inside your head, again

Do you need help with assisted suicide.....???_____these people can help.....

https://deathwithdignity.org/resources/faqs/#:~:text=Death%20with%20dignity%20is%20an,%2C%20humane%2C%20and%20dignified%20manner.

srg

You are a good artist.
You should stick with that.
Climate change is beyond our pay grade.

travelwp Loc: New Jersey

Nope, all STUPIDITY wants to do is declare a Climate emergency so he can satisfy his lefties.