Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
Millions of Photos
Page 1 of 11 next> last>>
Jul 17, 2022 07:47:32   #
Architect1776 Loc: In my mind
 
It seems with digital cameras people now have millions of photos saved.
Yes, storage is cheap.
But for what purpose?
Out of your 8 million photos saved, likely 7.999 are all virtually identical from many posts I have seen.
What happened to looking at the batch taken and saying this one is worth presenting and dumping the other 6,890 nearly identical, never to be shown photos into the trash.
Why waste time on them if they are not good enough to share? This includes family snapshots. Little Suzie with 600 shots at 30fps is quite boring choose one from the string of identical shots that says it all and delete the rest. Same for birds, bears or whatever else the subject.

Reply
Jul 17, 2022 07:50:14   #
CHG_CANON Loc: the Windy City
 
If your photos are not good enough, get better at using the <Delete> key.

Reply
Jul 17, 2022 08:11:45   #
Linda From Maine Loc: Yakima, Washington
 
Since storage is cheap, many consider it a waste of time to cull. Just let 'em sit there doing no harm Other folks may be hoarders who can't bear to part with anything. Archi, why do you care what is behind closed doors in someone else's home?

Reply
 
 
Jul 17, 2022 08:20:37   #
Tomfl101 Loc: Mount Airy, MD
 
I used to think that way. Back in the seventies as an amateur photographer I would save negatives and slides for a while, but then being a disorganized teen, I would throw them away, thinking I would never look at them again and never print them. Oh how I wish I still had them! As time goes by, old photographs get more and more valuable. I agree that 30 fps of anything is overkill. But good enough to share now will have a whole new meaning in 20 years. As long as storage is cheep, I’ll save everything and enjoy the fruits down the road.

Reply
Jul 17, 2022 08:23:32   #
BebuLamar
 
Architect1776 wrote:
It seems with digital cameras people now have millions of photos saved.
Yes, storage is cheap.
But for what purpose?
Out of your 8 million photos saved, likely 7.999 are all virtually identical from many posts I have seen.
What happened to looking at the batch taken and saying this one is worth presenting and dumping the other 6,890 nearly identical, never to be shown photos into the trash.
Why waste time on them if they are not good enough to share? This includes family snapshots. Little Suzie with 600 shots at 30fps is quite boring choose one from the string of identical shots that says it all and delete the rest. Same for birds, bears or whatever else the subject.
It seems with digital cameras people now have mill... (show quote)


I just tried to check my shutter count but the website returned too low value for what I know isn't correct. I believe I have around 6000 to 7000 actuations on my camera but it only show 1250. I have the camera for over 8 years and I only have about 6000 to 7000 shots so I do not have a lot of shots good or bad. Just like when I used film many of the shots I made with the digital camera I would shoot blank with a film camera. That is I just want to click I don't want the picture.

Reply
Jul 17, 2022 08:28:10   #
CHG_CANON Loc: the Windy City
 
Alas, this development will likely have a detrimental effect. How do you know you're getting better if you don't know what / where are your best images? How can you get better if you don't recognize what is wrong in each failed image?

Reply
Jul 17, 2022 08:34:09   #
jerryc41 Loc: Catskill Mts of NY
 
Linda From Maine wrote:
Since storage is cheap, many consider it a waste of time to cull.


Exactly!

Reply
 
 
Jul 17, 2022 08:37:41   #
Longshadow Loc: Audubon, PA, United States
 
CHG_CANON wrote:
If your photos are not good enough, get better at using the <Delete> key.


That's why I'm very selective on what I shoot to begin with.
Less to delete later.......

Just because I can easily take 100+ shots of something,
doesn't mean I should.

Reply
Jul 17, 2022 08:45:20   #
CHG_CANON Loc: the Windy City
 
Photography is easy. Get the image in focus and shoot lots of versions. Learn to keep only the best one or two.

Reply
Jul 17, 2022 08:52:58   #
Linda From Maine Loc: Yakima, Washington
 
CHG_CANON wrote:
Alas, this development will likely have a detrimental effect. How do you know you're getting better if you don't know what / where are your best images? How can you get better if you don't recognize what is wrong in each failed image?
"Saying this one is worth presenting" is one action; deleting the others of that burst or time/place is a different action. Unrelated IMO, especially if you have identified the best with a new file name or those handy stars or colored tag systems.

Also, wouldn't it be better to save a failed image in order to be able to review it later to refresh the conclusions of an aging brain?

Reply
Jul 17, 2022 08:57:39   #
CHG_CANON Loc: the Windy City
 
You don't create great images while admiring all your failures.

Reply
 
 
Jul 17, 2022 08:58:57   #
Linda From Maine Loc: Yakima, Washington
 
CHG_CANON wrote:
You don't create great images while admiring all your failures.
Who admires failures? That's just silly talk

.

Reply
Jul 17, 2022 09:04:23   #
CHG_CANON Loc: the Windy City
 
Linda From Maine wrote:
"Saying this one is worth presenting" is one action; deleting the others of that burst or time/place is a different action. Unrelated IMO, especially if you have identified the best with a new file name or those handy stars or colored tag systems.

Also, wouldn't it be better to save a failed image in order to be able to review it later to refresh the conclusions of an aging brain?


There are real 'costs'.

The cost of more storage. It may be cheap(er), but it's not free.

The time-cost of backing-up more storage / images. Your time is your most expensive and most limited resource.

If your star / color / foldering approach is truely so effective as to properly identify and efficiently find just the best images, that also means this approach can be leveraged to delete all the inferiors that don't have the identifying criteria, usually with a few counter-filters and a single <Delete> action.

Reply
Jul 17, 2022 09:04:41   #
JD750 Loc: SoCal
 
Architect1776 wrote:
It seems with digital cameras people now have millions of photos saved.
Yes, storage is cheap.
But for what purpose?
Out of your 8 million photos saved, likely 7.999 are all virtually identical from many posts I have seen.
What happened to looking at the batch taken and saying this one is worth presenting and dumping the other 6,890 nearly identical, never to be shown photos into the trash.
Why waste time on them if they are not good enough to share? This includes family snapshots. Little Suzie with 600 shots at 30fps is quite boring choose one from the string of identical shots that says it all and delete the rest. Same for birds, bears or whatever else the subject.
It seems with digital cameras people now have mill... (show quote)

Do we really need 1 TB of 30 MEG pix raw files of our kids with dirt on their faces?

For me, no. For others, maybe. Photography is an activity enjoyed by many different people in many different ways.

Reply
Jul 17, 2022 09:04:55   #
Jim Bianco
 
CHG_CANON wrote:
Photography is easy. Get the image in focus and shoot lots of versions. Learn to keep only the best one or two.

I agree, that's what I say, take alot keep a few.

Reply
Page 1 of 11 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.