dlwhawaii wrote:
Your title is correct, but somewhat incomplete. You neglected to mention the Supreme Court at 25%. NONE of them were put in place by Biden, but foisted upon us by Trump/McConnell. Congress ALSO received low marks. The Senate is 50% Republican, so it's gotta be tough to blame the Dems. On to the House. A little bit less than 50% (48.8%), so still tough to blame the Dems. What's your point?
Have you checked the Democrat Congress' approval rating? It is around 5-8% or something to that effect.
This is what:
There is a Democrat and Democrat media war now being waged against the Supreme Court because it no longer characteristically legislates from the bench. It is now declared illegitimate, and its rulings to be ignored.
Elizabeth Warren screams about a need to pack the Court by first ending the 180-year filibuster.
Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) called out Justices Neil Gorsuch and Brett Kavanagh by name at the doors of the Court, issuing warnings of violence to both: “You won’t know what hit you if you go forward with these awful decisions.” What sort of “force” did a U.S. senator refer to by screaming to a mob about what might “hit” the justices or when he further threatened, that the two “have released the whirlwind and [they] will pay the price”? What price? What whirlwind for unelected Justices with lifetime tenures?
Joe Biden, who once claimed Trump showed insufficient respect for the judiciary, now savagely attacks the U.S. Supreme Court while abroad in rants before the media and his smiling toadies.
In sum, laws and the Court are said to be irrelevant and to be ignored by states, cities, and counties at will—depending on their usefulness or impediments to the Left’s agenda.
vdh
Fotoartist wrote:
This is what:
There is a Democrat and Democrat media war now being waged against the Supreme Court because it no longer characteristically legislates from the bench. It is now declared illegitimate, and its rulings to be ignored.
Elizabeth Warren screams about a need to pack the Court by first ending the 180-year filibuster.
Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) called out Justices Neil Gorsuch and Brett Kavanagh by name at the doors of the Court, issuing warnings of violence to both: “You won’t know what hit you if you go forward with these awful decisions.” What sort of “force” did a U.S. senator refer to by screaming to a mob about what might “hit” the justices or when he further threatened, that the two “have released the whirlwind and [they] will pay the price”? What price? What whirlwind for unelected Justices with lifetime tenures?
Joe Biden, who once claimed Trump showed insufficient respect for the judiciary, now savagely attacks the U.S. Supreme Court while abroad in rants before the media and his smiling toadies.
In sum, laws and the Court are said to be irrelevant and to be ignored by states, cities, and counties at will—depending on their usefulness or impediments to the Left’s agenda.
vdh
This is what: br br There is a Democrat and Democ... (
show quote)
You're extremely forgetful there Fot. Trump/McConnell foisted three liars onto the Supreme Court after McConnell delayed appointment of a Justice for over a year and a half under Obama. Why should we NOT BE PISSED OFF?
dlwhawaii wrote:
You're extremely forgetful there Fot. Trump/McConnell foisted three liars onto the Supreme Court after McConnell delayed appointment of a Justice for over a year and a half under Obama. Why should we NOT BE PISSED OFF?
Threatening SCJ for being pissed off because Democrats are lying about the Justices lying?? Lol
dakotacheryl wrote:
The Supremes are also getting 24/7 negative coverage on media etc. What who Slow Joe's rating be with honest media coverage?
"What who Slow Joe's rating be with honest media coverage"?
Sorry, but I really don't know what this means.
thom w wrote:
"What who Slow Joe's rating be with honest media coverage"?
Sorry, but I really don't know what this means.
really I think you know exactly what it means, quit being a dick
Racmanaz wrote:
The Supreme Court Justices are not elected officials, Biden and Congress are.
That's true. When did you discover this?
wilpharm wrote:
really I think you know exactly what it means, quit being a dick
If my wife were still alive, she probably could explain it to me. She was good at solving word puzzles. I don't have a lot of interest in them. Why didn't you explain it rather than just attacking, which is your modus operandi?
Also, I believe you are lying when you say you think.
Racmanaz wrote:
Threatening SCJ for being pissed off because Democrats are lying about the Justices lying?? Lol
Typical response from you Rock. Nonsense. LOL
thom w wrote:
If my wife were still alive, she probably could explain it to me. She was good at solving word puzzles. I don't have a lot of interest in them. Why didn't you explain it rather than just attacking, which is your modus operandi?
Also, I believe you are lying when you say you think.
you know damn well what he meant...quit playing stupid...actually you dont have to work very hard to be the champ..you there already
wilpharm wrote:
really I think you know exactly what it means, quit being a dick
Thanks. Typed that on my phone and didn’t see the auto correct.
“What would” Not “What who”
dakotacheryl wrote:
Thanks. Typed that on my phone and didn’t see the auto correct.
“What would” Not “What who”
Thank you. I figured it was a typo, but I didn't see what it should be.
dakotacheryl wrote:
Thanks. Typed that on my phone and didn’t see the auto correct.
“What would” Not “What who”
he knew it was a typo...just being his typical dorky self...everyone else knew what you meant
wilpharm wrote:
he knew it was a typo...just being his typical dorky self...everyone else knew what you meant
What is wrong with you? Sure, I knew it was probably a typo, but that doesn't mean I knew what she was trying to say. She put the effort into posting, I figured it was worth at least a bit of effort to find out what she was trying to say. I hardly ever agree with her, but that doesn't mean I'm not interested in what she has to say. I have no problem with her having a typo, or in this case an auto spell problem. She graciously explained, even if not directly to me. I usually don't care if I can't understand what you post because I'm just not that interested in what you have to say. I usually disagree with her, but I do believe she posts in good faith. I have no delusion that you do anything in good faith.
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.