Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
General Chit-Chat (non-photography talk)
UFO's and the SR-71
Page <<first <prev 4 of 4
Jun 12, 2022 20:06:28   #
chikid68 Loc: Tennesse USA
 
rustfarmer wrote:
Way back then it was reported there were missile silos in Chicago. Other places I've seen UFOs include Cookeville TN where there are reported to be huge lodestone deposits. I saw two different things there; one a group of three in formation; one a single bright object bright enough to cast shadows and confirmed by a football coach working on the field with full lights on that said it was so bright it drew his attention. I hope these hearings show interesting new data.


Yeah I have heard the legends of the supposed silos although I think submarines would be more likely.
Think about it a mobile arsenal cruising around the great lakes.

Reply
Jun 12, 2022 23:47:49   #
SteveR Loc: Michigan
 
KillroyII wrote:
Of course the difference in equipment matters; however, shouldn’t we also consider that the amazingly sharpe pictures from the SR-71 has Air Force (& CIA) photographers and the blurry pictures come from Navy fighter pilots... maybe the photographer makes a difference.

Of course the difference in equipment matters; how... (show quote)


Since my Dad retired from the Air Force Reserves with 20 years, after 7 1/2 years active during and after the War, I find this funny. Some on this forum, however, will not.

Reply
Jun 13, 2022 07:43:03   #
KillroyII Loc: Middle Georgia
 
SteveR wrote:
Since my Dad retired from the Air Force Reserves with 20 years, after 7 1/2 years active during and after the War, I find this funny. Some on this forum, however, will not.


It was meant to be funny... and being cautious, to make sure everyone got that it was meant to be funny, I put a row of laughing faces after the text... to make sure no one would take it as anything but humor

I agree with you... even with the laughing faces... some will not see the humor.

Reply
 
 
Jun 13, 2022 10:47:30   #
smiller999 Loc: Corpus Christi
 
Drbobcameraguy wrote:
I saw a pic in readers digest in the early 80s that showed a flower garden from a satellite. It was so clear you could see what the difference in types of flowers that were used. So I don't know all the details but I do know they have stuff we can't believe exists.


I think the picture you saw must have been from an aircraft. That type of satellite imagery is very highly classified, not something Readers Digest would have been able to get back then. I worked with imagery from those systems for some years, and I can assure you the resolution was not as good as that (now days commercial imagery rivals the "spy" ones, which is a problem for all govts now). Diffraction limits are real things. As is atmospheric distortion. While the resolution is quite amazing, you cannot see individual flowers (although sometimes you might distinguish individual plants), you cannot see a quarter, and you cannot read a license plate. But that's OK, that's not the purpose.

Reply
Jun 13, 2022 17:04:41   #
Tom Bar
 
They showed us photos of mailboxes and license plates in Havana suburbs in 1972 from SR-71 and they had just been de-classified. They showed this to a bunch of us MD's who were learning to be officers and gentlemen.

Reply
Jun 13, 2022 17:56:04   #
Fredrick Loc: Former NYC, now San Francisco Bay Area
 
Tom Bar wrote:
They showed us photos of mailboxes and license plates in Havana suburbs in 1972 from SR-71 and they had just been de-classified. They showed this to a bunch of us MD's who were learning to be officers and gentlemen.



Reply
Jun 13, 2022 20:11:51   #
smiller999 Loc: Corpus Christi
 
Tom Bar wrote:
They showed us photos of mailboxes and license plates in Havana suburbs in 1972 from SR-71 and they had just been de-classified. They showed this to a bunch of us MD's who were learning to be officers and gentlemen.


That would work fine. The diffraction limit from the (approx) 20 mile altitude of an SR71 is considerable smaller than a satellite at 100+ miles.

Reply
 
 
Jun 14, 2022 18:51:05   #
Ichiban365
 
Fredrick wrote:
Back in the 60’s - 70’s Russia had cameras in satellites far superior to ours. If a quarter was on the ground they could tell you if it was heads or tail.


The reason the Russians could do that and we could not is that if a ruble was on the ground, someone would pick it up within ten seconds. Their cameras may have been superior but their economic system was not.

Reply
Jun 14, 2022 20:09:24   #
Fredrick Loc: Former NYC, now San Francisco Bay Area
 
Ichiban365 wrote:
The reason the Russians could do that and we could not is that if a ruble was on the ground, someone would pick it up within ten seconds. Their cameras may have been superior but their economic system was not.



Reply
Jun 16, 2022 14:47:41   #
qrpnut7 Loc: Brattleboro, Vt.
 
Most footage shown is thermal or infra red, not color like video or phone cams

Reply
Page <<first <prev 4 of 4
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
General Chit-Chat (non-photography talk)
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.