Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Check out Printers and Color Printing Forum section of our forum.
Photo Gallery
Moon
Nov 19, 2012 20:31:23   #
Straight Shooter Loc: Newfoundland, Canada
 
A moonshot from this evening.

Moon - 19Nov. 2012
Moon - 19Nov. 2012...

Reply
Nov 19, 2012 20:37:05   #
Nikonian72 Loc: Chico CA
 
You may be interested in this new UHH specialty section:
Astronomical Photography Forum at http://www.uglyhedgehog.com/s-109-1.html

The detial in your image is superb. What camera & lens?

Reply
Nov 19, 2012 20:51:10   #
Straight Shooter Loc: Newfoundland, Canada
 
Thanks! It's a Canon 60D connected directly to a 150 mm reflector telescope, in effect using it as a prime lens. Quite a lot of fun to use.

Reply
Check out True Macro-Photography Forum section of our forum.
Nov 20, 2012 13:09:55   #
bogeyeliot Loc: Signal Hill, CA
 
Straight Shooter wrote:
Thanks! It's a Canon 60D connected directly to a 150 mm reflector telescope, in effect using it as a prime lens. Quite a lot of fun to use.


I take it the 150mm figure used to describe the reflector telescope is a "different" scale from a 150mm figure if used to describe a camera lens? That's a beautiful moon shot! Could you elaborate on the 150 mm please?

Reply
Nov 20, 2012 13:57:42   #
Straight Shooter Loc: Newfoundland, Canada
 
I should have posted this in the astrophotography section - sorry about that, I'm a newby. But to answer your question, yes, you are right. With a telescope, 150mm refers to the size (diameter) of the tube - the opening, or light-gathering capacity (as with spotting scopes). Nothing to do with the focal length. I think the focal length of this telescope is 750 mm (not huge as telescopes go). So with the crop factor of the camera, that puts it in the range of about a 1000 mm telephoto lens equivalent. The image is fairly heavily cropped, by the way. The settings were ISO 100, 1/200th, manual mode - arrived at by trial and error.
Thanks for looking!

Reply
Nov 20, 2012 14:41:01   #
Robbie7 Loc: Northampton. England
 
A really nice detailed shot. thanks for sharing..regards :-)

Reply
Nov 21, 2012 21:53:09   #
Pockets Loc: Dallas Metro
 
Straight Shooter wrote:
A moonshot from this evening.


My shots. Having trouble with my tripod, tho'. I have a joystick ball head and it doesn't give me the range I need to tilt the camer up toward the moon. Is there a better ball head/tripod combo? I use Manfroto 322RC2 on a Manfroto 055 tripod.





Reply
 
 
Nov 22, 2012 10:22:22   #
Straight Shooter Loc: Newfoundland, Canada
 
Thanks Robbie!

Dellen...: how did you manage to get the moon with a background of stars? I don't recall seeing that before. Re. tripod: have you considered a gimbal head? The bees knees for birding, but I don't know how it would work out celestial work.

Reply
Nov 22, 2012 11:32:57   #
Pockets Loc: Dallas Metro
 
Straight Shooter wrote:
Thanks Robbie!

Dellen...: how did you manage to get the moon with a background of stars? I don't recall seeing that before. Re. tripod: have you considered a gimbal head? The bees knees for birding, but I don't know how it would work out celestial work.


I will check the Gimbal out,...thanks so much! As for the stars, that was a "surprise" for me! I live in Texas -- in a suburb of Dallas that is a little remote -- not as much light around. I've never tried to shoot the moon at that phase. When I did PP, i noted that I was able to adjust so that the stars showed up. Way cool! I'll probably never be able to replicate it! :-)

Reply
Nov 27, 2012 07:18:50   #
Archy Loc: Lake Hamilton, Florida
 
Straight Shooter wrote:
A moonshot from this evening.


:thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup:

Reply
Nov 27, 2012 13:59:31   #
Wahawk Loc: NE IA
 
Straight Shooter wrote:
Thanks Robbie!

Dellen...: how did you manage to get the moon with a background of stars? I don't recall seeing that before.


Don't think that those are actually stars as stars would not be visible behind the shadowed portion of the moon!

Reply
Check out Black and White Photography section of our forum.
Nov 27, 2012 21:40:27   #
Pockets Loc: Dallas Metro
 
Wahawk wrote:
Straight Shooter wrote:
Thanks Robbie!

Dellen...: how did you manage to get the moon with a background of stars? I don't recall seeing that before.


Don't think that those are actually stars as stars would not be visible behind the shadowed portion of the moon!


Beats me how it happened. All I know is that depending on how I adjust the exposure, they show up in all of my shots from that one night. Never happend before. Instead of shooting at a slight tilt, I was shooting almost straight up with my assistant (. If anyone can explain it for me, please do! :-) Now I'm intrigued! :-)

Reply
Nov 27, 2012 21:41:20   #
Pockets Loc: Dallas Metro
 
dellenthompson wrote:
Wahawk wrote:
Straight Shooter wrote:
Thanks Robbie!

Dellen...: how did you manage to get the moon with a background of stars? I don't recall seeing that before.


Don't think that those are actually stars as stars would not be visible behind the shadowed portion of the moon!


Beats me how it happened. All I know is that depending on how I adjust the exposure, they show up in all of my shots from that one night. Never happend before. Instead of shooting at a slight tilt, I was shooting almost straight up with my assistant (. If anyone can explain it for me, please do! :-) Now I'm intrigued! :-)
quote=Wahawk quote=Straight Shooter Thanks Robbi... (show quote)


My assistant is my mom. I think I'm her entertainment. :-)

Reply
Nov 27, 2012 21:48:28   #
Wahawk Loc: NE IA
 
Maybe dust or smoke in the air?? Especially if only from that night?
My other thought is something on the front of the lens??? But something on the lens wouldn't be that defined. I am thinking something in the atmosphere like dust or smoke particles between the earth and the moon.

Reply
Nov 27, 2012 22:11:00   #
Pockets Loc: Dallas Metro
 
Wahawk wrote:
Maybe dust or smoke in the air?? Especially if only from that night?
My other thought is something on the front of the lens??? But something on the lens wouldn't be that defined. I am thinking something in the atmosphere like dust or smoke particles between the earth and the moon.


Makes sense! My sinuses have been wicked bad!

Reply
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Check out Professional and Advanced Portraiture section of our forum.
Photo Gallery
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.