Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
My Two Mirrorless Cameras
Page <<first <prev 5 of 9 next> last>>
Apr 11, 2022 13:31:40   #
jaymatt Loc: Alexandria, Indiana
 

Reply
Apr 11, 2022 13:37:41   #
dennis2146 Loc: Eastern Idaho
 
rmalarz wrote:
I don't see a weight reduction advantage at all.
--Bob


When I saw the title, I thought so. Great cameras. I really need to use my two.

Dennis

Reply
Apr 11, 2022 13:40:20   #
alfaman
 
A truly graphic presentation: beautiful. What camera did you use to take the photo?

Reply
 
 
Apr 11, 2022 13:41:42   #
rmalarz Loc: Tempe, Arizona
 
Thanks for the smilies, John.
--Bob
jaymatt wrote:

Reply
Apr 11, 2022 13:42:30   #
rmalarz Loc: Tempe, Arizona
 
Glad you liked it, Dennis. That they are and that you should.
--Bob
dennis2146 wrote:
When I saw the title, I thought so. Great cameras. I really need to use my two.

Dennis

Reply
Apr 11, 2022 13:44:03   #
rmalarz Loc: Tempe, Arizona
 
Thanks, alfaman. I used a Hasselblad 500c/907x.
--Bob
alfaman wrote:
A truly graphic presentation: beautiful. What camera did you use to take the photo?

Reply
Apr 11, 2022 13:57:49   #
GAS496 Loc: Arizona
 
Haha! I agree probably not weight savers. Mind if I post a photo of my two mirror less cameras?

Reply
 
 
Apr 11, 2022 14:00:47   #
rmalarz Loc: Tempe, Arizona
 
Please, go right ahead.
--Bob
GAS496 wrote:
Haha! I agree probably not weight savers. Mind if I post a photo of my two mirror less cameras?

Reply
Apr 11, 2022 14:29:55   #
JD750 Loc: SoCal
 
rmalarz wrote:
I don't think I can put this in the back of my car and head out for a photo day.
--Bob


Probably not! The scientists would be annoyed at losing their new instrument. And the cooling system is important and that won’t fit in the car. But maybe in the future when the scientists tire of it they will loan it out. Bring an 18-wheeler to carry the cooling system.

Reply
Apr 11, 2022 14:56:43   #
PHRubin Loc: Nashville TN USA
 

Reply
Apr 11, 2022 15:04:38   #
cbtsam Loc: Monkton, MD
 
Alafoto wrote:
Wait! Wait! No autofocus? Oh my...


Well, they do have "Live View"

Reply
 
 
Apr 11, 2022 15:17:17   #
GAS496 Loc: Arizona
 
rmalarz wrote:
Please, go right ahead.
--Bob


Mirrorless, 100% view coverage, live view and best of all no batteries required. A sherpa would be nice though!



Reply
Apr 11, 2022 15:34:40   #
lamiaceae Loc: San Luis Obispo County, CA
 
rmalarz wrote:
I don't see a weight reduction advantage at all.
--Bob


Love it. And I don't even see a place to put the mirror or a pentaprism.

Reply
Apr 11, 2022 15:34:51   #
Mac Loc: Pittsburgh, Philadelphia now Hernando Co. Fl.
 
rmalarz wrote:
I don't see a weight reduction advantage at all.
--Bob



Reply
Apr 11, 2022 16:07:07   #
Beenthere
 
rmalarz wrote:
I don't see a weight reduction advantage at all.
--Bob


Whew!! Didn't see that coming.., but he's right folks, mirrorless has been around for a long time. The modern term refers to comparisons between 35mm SLRs and DSLRs which require a mirror. If you need more confirmation, just ask Ansel..?

Reply
Page <<first <prev 5 of 9 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.