Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
The Attic
Hillary Clinton is Finally Facing Accountability
Page <prev 2 of 3 next>
Apr 4, 2022 13:17:33   #
rmalarz Loc: Tempe, Arizona
 
Well, this thread took a dramatic deviation.
--Bob
Fotoartist wrote:
Where were you during the summer of the BLM Riots when no Leftists were prosecuted?

Reply
Apr 4, 2022 13:35:32   #
Fotoartist Loc: Detroit, Michigan
 


I can't believe you believe this. Do you believe the fact that Blacks were looting the Stores, burning them down, and killing people for the sake of racial justice? And that anything done by Blacks must be taken in the context of correcting racial injustice?

From the article, "While some Black Lives Matter protests involved the destruction of private property, none attempted to thwart elections. The attempt to overturn our electoral process is a grave threat to our republic. Movements for racial justice, for the end of police brutality against Black people, do not seek to rob citizens of their rightful participation in the democratic process... Do some fringe actors in these racial justice movements go too far? Yes. But they are not representative of nor integral to the movements themselves."

How does anyone know that all of the political protestors that entered the Capitol on Jan. 6 were trying to Thwart the election? They were protesting because the election was corrupt and stolen and their vote was thwarted. They were Protesting and the cops waived them in and it got out of control, period.

This Black person, Gloria Purvis states, 'the protestors believed the white population was in decline and that they believe the “great replacement” theory that Black people and other people of color are replacing whites and diluting their political strength. Wrong. The simple explanation is, the Jan. 6 protestors were trying to protest the election because the election was corrupt and stolen and their vote was disenfranchised, just like Blacks of the past.

Reply
Apr 4, 2022 13:38:29   #
Penny MG Loc: Fresno, Texas
 
JohnFrim wrote:
As an oft-accused/oft-labelled Lying-Leftist-Democrat-Clinton-Obama-Biden supporter, let me simply state that if the courts deemed that Hillary (or Barrack or Joe, or anyone -- including Trump -- for that matter) did something illegal then they should be prosecuted.


I will agree with you on this ONE.

Reply
 
 
Apr 4, 2022 14:22:26   #
Steven Seward Loc: Cleveland, Ohio
 
Fotoartist wrote:
I can't believe you believe this. Do you believe the fact that Blacks were looting the Stores, burning them down, and killing people for the sake of racial justice? And that anything done by Blacks must be taken in the context of correcting racial injustice?

From the article, "While some Black Lives Matter protests involved the destruction of private property, none attempted to thwart elections. The attempt to overturn our electoral process is a grave threat to our republic. Movements for racial justice, for the end of police brutality against Black people, do not seek to rob citizens of their rightful participation in the democratic process... Do some fringe actors in these racial justice movements go too far? Yes. But they are not representative of nor integral to the movements themselves."

How does anyone know that all of the political protestors that entered the Capitol on Jan. 6 were trying to Thwart the election? They were protesting because the election was corrupt and stolen and their vote was thwarted. They were Protesting and the cops waived them in and it got out of control, period.

This Black person, Gloria Purvis states, 'the protestors believed the white population was in decline and that they believe the “great replacement” theory that Black people and other people of color are replacing whites and diluting their political strength. Wrong. The simple explanation is, the Jan. 6 protestors were trying to protest the election because the election was corrupt and stolen and their vote was disenfranchised, just like Blacks of the past.
I can't believe you believe this. Do you believe t... (show quote)

Amen!!

Reply
Apr 4, 2022 15:35:44   #
Triple G
 
Penny MG wrote:
I will agree with you on this ONE.


I agree too.

Reply
Apr 4, 2022 17:02:22   #
anotherview Loc: California
 
Thanks for update on this wrongdoing.

I note, however, that the story does not directly link HRC to it, only "Hillary Clinton’s 2016 Presidential campaign and the Democrat National Committee." These entities, not HRC, received fines.
rmalarz wrote:
Hillary Clinton is finally facing accountability.

This will create a major problem for Democrats.

And now Hillary Clinton just got slapped with a huge legal violation that proved this crime took place.

The Federal Election Commission fined Hillary Clinton’s 2016 Presidential campaign and the Democrat National Committee over $100,000 for improperly reporting money paid to the law firm of Perkins Coie.

The Clinton campaign and the Democrat National Committee reported the expenditures for legal expenses when in reality Perkins Coie used the money to hire Christopher Steele to put together the hoax Russian collusion dossier.

“The Federal Election Commission has fined both Hillary Clinton’s 2016 presidential campaign and the Democratic National Committee for lying about how they spent money used to fund the now-debunked Steele dossier on former President Donald Trump,” the New York Post reported.

“The Clinton campaign and the DNC will be forced to pay $8,000 and $105,000 respectively for mislabeling payments that ultimately went to Fusion GPS, the consulting firm that commissioned the dossier, according to FEC documents viewed by the Post,” the New York Post continued.

“The fines stem from a complaint originally filed in 2018 by the Coolidge Reagan Foundation, which was informed of the outcome on Tuesday,” the New York Post added.

“The Clinton campaign and the DNC paid more than $1 million combined to powerful Democratic law firm Perkins Coie, which engaged Fusion GPS to dig for dirt on Trump,” the New York Post continued, adding that, “Fusion GPS, in turn, hired former British spy Christopher Steele — whose namesake dossier included allegations that Russian security services possessed a tape of Trump in a Moscow hotel room with prostitutes who were supposedly urinating on a bed where the Obamas had previously stayed.”

The Clinton campaign and the Democrat National Committee tried to hide the fact that they hired a foreign spy to dig up dirt on their political opponent by funneling the money through a law firm.

But House Republicans exposed this scheme back in 2018.

Donald Trump and many of his supporters are now hoping that Special Counsel John Durham will bring additional criminal charges against the Clinton campaign and Deep State operatives for pushing the hoax that Trump colluded with the Russians during the 2016 election.

And they hope the FEC fine against Hillary Clinton is just the beginning.

Renewed Right will keep you up-to-date on any new developments in this ongoing story.

https://renewedright.com/hillary-clinton-just-got-slapped-with-a-huge-legal-violation-that-proved-this-crime-took-place/?utm_source=rrnl&utm_medium=ong&utm_campaign=1485064207

--Bob
Hillary Clinton is finally facing accountability. ... (show quote)

Reply
Apr 4, 2022 17:11:49   #
JohnFrim Loc: Somewhere in the Great White North.
 
Fotoartist wrote:
Where were you during the summer of the BLM Riots when no Leftists were prosecuted?


I was right here... probably complaining about something Trump did. I can't be expected to stay on top of every crime or stupid act in the US, so I pick my beefs... mostly about Trump.

But then, you already know my position on US politics and laws because I have stated it many times:
- lawbreakers should ALL be arrested, charged and prosecuted as appropriate; no excuses for anyone... ANYONE!
- I have no preference of Democrat over Republican; I only have a gripe about Trump because of who and what he is, POTUS or not.

- oops, almost forgot... your 2nd Amendment sucks!

Reply
 
 
Apr 4, 2022 17:44:14   #
Steven Seward Loc: Cleveland, Ohio
 
anotherview wrote:
Thanks for update on this wrongdoing.

I note, however, that the story does not directly link HRC to it, only "Hillary Clinton’s 2016 Presidential campaign and the Democrat National Committee." These entities, not HRC, received fines.

You are presuming that Hillary was totally unaware of the most startling allegations leveled against Trump during the entire 2016 election season, namely the Steel Dossier. Yes, of course we all believe you.

Reply
Apr 4, 2022 20:16:59   #
scooter1 Loc: Yacolt, Wa.
 
rmalarz wrote:
Hillary Clinton is finally facing accountability.

This will create a major problem for Democrats.

And now Hillary Clinton just got slapped with a huge legal violation that proved this crime took place.

The Federal Election Commission fined Hillary Clinton’s 2016 Presidential campaign and the Democrat National Committee over $100,000 for improperly reporting money paid to the law firm of Perkins Coie.

The Clinton campaign and the Democrat National Committee reported the expenditures for legal expenses when in reality Perkins Coie used the money to hire Christopher Steele to put together the hoax Russian collusion dossier.

“The Federal Election Commission has fined both Hillary Clinton’s 2016 presidential campaign and the Democratic National Committee for lying about how they spent money used to fund the now-debunked Steele dossier on former President Donald Trump,” the New York Post reported.

“The Clinton campaign and the DNC will be forced to pay $8,000 and $105,000 respectively for mislabeling payments that ultimately went to Fusion GPS, the consulting firm that commissioned the dossier, according to FEC documents viewed by the Post,” the New York Post continued.

“The fines stem from a complaint originally filed in 2018 by the Coolidge Reagan Foundation, which was informed of the outcome on Tuesday,” the New York Post added.

“The Clinton campaign and the DNC paid more than $1 million combined to powerful Democratic law firm Perkins Coie, which engaged Fusion GPS to dig for dirt on Trump,” the New York Post continued, adding that, “Fusion GPS, in turn, hired former British spy Christopher Steele — whose namesake dossier included allegations that Russian security services possessed a tape of Trump in a Moscow hotel room with prostitutes who were supposedly urinating on a bed where the Obamas had previously stayed.”

The Clinton campaign and the Democrat National Committee tried to hide the fact that they hired a foreign spy to dig up dirt on their political opponent by funneling the money through a law firm.

But House Republicans exposed this scheme back in 2018.

Donald Trump and many of his supporters are now hoping that Special Counsel John Durham will bring additional criminal charges against the Clinton campaign and Deep State operatives for pushing the hoax that Trump colluded with the Russians during the 2016 election.

And they hope the FEC fine against Hillary Clinton is just the beginning.

Renewed Right will keep you up-to-date on any new developments in this ongoing story.

https://renewedright.com/hillary-clinton-just-got-slapped-with-a-huge-legal-violation-that-proved-this-crime-took-place/?utm_source=rrnl&utm_medium=ong&utm_campaign=1485064207

--Bob
Hillary Clinton is finally facing accountability. ... (show quote)


Clinton only got hit for a $8000 fine. That's like fining the rest of us 10 cents. She's still laughing all the way to the bank.

Reply
Apr 4, 2022 22:38:58   #
anotherview Loc: California
 
Not so. Instead, I presume HRC kept herself at an arm's length from any performance of wrongdoing.

She came closest to criminal charges for her mishandling of classified materials and her e-mail misconduct while Secretary of State. The authorities dropped charges because she had no intent to commit a crime.
Steven Seward wrote:
You are presuming that Hillary was totally unaware of the most startling allegations leveled against Trump during the entire 2016 election season, namely the Steel Dossier. Yes, of course we all believe you.

Reply
Apr 5, 2022 12:46:43   #
btbg
 
anotherview wrote:
Not so. Instead, I presume HRC kept herself at an arm's length from any performance of wrongdoing.

She came closest to criminal charges for her mishandling of classified materials and her e-mail misconduct while Secretary of State. The authorities dropped charges because she had no intent to commit a crime.


But, you see that is the problem. She "had no intent" yet the law says nothing about intent. At the same time that she was not charged there was a sailor who took a couple of cell phone photos of the inside of the nuclear submarine he was deployed on. He was charged under the same law that they did not charge Hillary under even though just like Hillary they determined that he had no intent.

Intent was irrelevant to the crime. And, she probably did keep herself at arm's length from any performance of wrongdoing, but she clearly knew about it since it was all over the news. It really stretches credibility to believe that your campaign can purchase false information from Russia, and then that false information can be used to spy on first Carter Page and then Trump, and you don't know about it. Give me a break.

It is clearly a huge political story that not only shows the corruption of the Democratic party, but of the FBI and CIA who went along with the plan even though the evidence shows that they knew it was false.

Reply
 
 
Apr 5, 2022 12:57:26   #
thom w Loc: San Jose, CA
 
Fotoartist wrote:
I can't believe you believe this. Do you believe the fact that Blacks were looting the Stores, burning them down, and killing people for the sake of racial justice? And that anything done by Blacks must be taken in the context of correcting racial injustice?

From the article, "While some Black Lives Matter protests involved the destruction of private property, none attempted to thwart elections. The attempt to overturn our electoral process is a grave threat to our republic. Movements for racial justice, for the end of police brutality against Black people, do not seek to rob citizens of their rightful participation in the democratic process... Do some fringe actors in these racial justice movements go too far? Yes. But they are not representative of nor integral to the movements themselves."

How does anyone know that all of the political protestors that entered the Capitol on Jan. 6 were trying to Thwart the election? They were protesting because the election was corrupt and stolen and their vote was thwarted. They were Protesting and the cops waived them in and it got out of control, period.

This Black person, Gloria Purvis states, 'the protestors believed the white population was in decline and that they believe the “great replacement” theory that Black people and other people of color are replacing whites and diluting their political strength. Wrong. The simple explanation is, the Jan. 6 protestors were trying to protest the election because the election was corrupt and stolen and their vote was disenfranchised, just like Blacks of the past.
I can't believe you believe this. Do you believe t... (show quote)


Lots of accusations. Too bad you don't see any need for evidence.

Reply
Apr 5, 2022 13:00:31   #
thom w Loc: San Jose, CA
 
Steven Seward wrote:
You are presuming that Hillary was totally unaware of the most startling allegations leveled against Trump during the entire 2016 election season, namely the Steel Dossier. Yes, of course we all believe you.


"no more than 500 people will be killed by covid". Sound familiar?

Reply
Apr 5, 2022 13:53:27   #
Penny MG Loc: Fresno, Texas
 
scooter1 wrote:
Clinton only got hit for a $8000 fine. That's like fining the rest of us 10 cents. She's still laughing all the way to the bank.


Pathetic, isn't it. Anyone else who lies to congress or the FBI gets jail time. Hopefully, soon, this Bi&*%$c=h will be looking through bars.

Reply
Apr 5, 2022 15:15:28   #
Steven Seward Loc: Cleveland, Ohio
 
btbg wrote:
But, you see that is the problem. She "had no intent" yet the law says nothing about intent. At the same time that she was not charged there was a sailor who took a couple of cell phone photos of the inside of the nuclear submarine he was deployed on. He was charged under the same law that they did not charge Hillary under even though just like Hillary they determined that he had no intent.

Intent was irrelevant to the crime. And, she probably did keep herself at arm's length from any performance of wrongdoing, but she clearly knew about it since it was all over the news. It really stretches credibility to believe that your campaign can purchase false information from Russia, and then that false information can be used to spy on first Carter Page and then Trump, and you don't know about it. Give me a break.

It is clearly a huge political story that not only shows the corruption of the Democratic party, but of the FBI and CIA who went along with the plan even though the evidence shows that they knew it was false.
But, you see that is the problem. She "had no... (show quote)

Excellent assessment. It just shows the corruption of the Justice Department to pick and choose who to prosecute.

Reply
Page <prev 2 of 3 next>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
The Attic
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.