RayS wrote:
I'm going there in May. Many sites say photography (without flash) is acceptable for private use only. I will be shooting with my Nikon D500. Any ideas about exposure including ISO would be welcome. I will also have my IPhone 6s with me as backup.
I have been shooting that camera for a couple of years now and have shot in the local museums. I use a Nikkor 16-80 when doing that. I have found that I can get good shots with an iso as high as 2400 and a shutter speed as low as 1/100. I'm usually at around f 5.6. My settings will very a lot depending upon the ambient light. When shooting with that high an iso I've gotten good pics printed up to 8x10 without having to resort to using something like the Topaz program to reduce graininess. Take sample pics and then quickly adjust if needed. The crowds may prevent you from getting more than a couple of good opportunities. Sounds like a great trip - enjoy.
Take lots of pictures at different settings. Do some experimentation before you get there.
Frayud wrote:
Why not just turn to "Auto" and just enjoy the immediate beauty of the sights you are visiting? You can touch the photos up later in Post.
In 2005 when I first got my first DSLR I went to Hawaii. Shot everything on auto. Didn’t know any better. Still amazing images. At least back then I enjoyed being there.
RayS wrote:
Thanks for the input and advice. Maybe my question was too broad but I was hoping for a small idea on how high of ISO I could push my D500 and still get reasonable (not 30 X 40) results. I'd hate to get home and find I'd pushed way too far.
Here is my suggestion, based upon my experience. I shot with a D500 in a number of galleries and houses of worship. The camera is 'pretty darn' good in low light situations. Best to take with you a 'faster' lens and more of a wide angle. Nikon's 18-80 (or 85) or 17-35, would both work exceedingly well. There is VR in the camera - you don't need a tripod as such would also bring the docents to your side in a flash. As well, do not use a flash; that is verboten in an art gallery.
Have a wonderful trip!
billnikon
Loc: Pennsylvania/Ohio/Florida/Maui/Oregon/Vermont
RayS wrote:
I'm going there in May. Many sites say photography (without flash) is acceptable for private use only. I will be shooting with my Nikon D500. Any ideas about exposure including ISO would be welcome. I will also have my IPhone 6s with me as backup.
Go auto ISO, set your shutter speed at 1/30 sec., Aperture Priority and your set.
nikon123 wrote:
Here is my suggestion, based upon my experience. I shot with a D500 in a number of galleries and houses of worship. The camera is 'pretty darn' good in low light situations. Best to take with you a 'faster' lens and more of a wide angle. Nikon's 18-80 (or 85) or 17-35, would both work exceedingly well. There is VR in the camera - you don't need a tripod as such would also bring the docents to your side in a flash. As well, do not use a flash; that is verboten in an art gallery.
Have a wonderful trip!
Here is my suggestion, based upon my experience. I... (
show quote)
I've had my D500 for approaching 4 years. It'll do a lot of things...way more than most here will acknowledge. Unfortunately, in-camera VR is not one of its many advanced capabilities.
Also, to the OP, I have learned that indiscriminate use of Auto ISO in inappropriate situations is one of the sources of low-light bad mouthing of the D500. Do not do it. Resist the temptation. It is pure evil in this situation.
It’s the lens more than the camera that matters. A 24-70 E 2.8 with VR II or a 35 1.8 will handle things very differently than a consumer lens. I am surprised that they allow photography. Many famous places in Italy now ban photography of famous works.
I was there many years ago and if I remember correctly the place is not well lite.
That said; take photos of a long hallway if you can that is not very bright in your house with lights off and on a cloudy day. Try various iso, shutter speeds, and F stops.
I just did that and took photos standing 10' from a painting with the D500, 18-300 mm lens at 65mm, 1/100 and f 5.3 10' and ISO was 51,000. My conclusion is that the photo at this ISO is noisy, I may have camera shake, the camera had difficulty finding focus.
I did little post processing to adjust noise, exposure and sharpen the attached photo. I did not spend much time on this experiment.
THe web site will not allow me to add a photo
I tried the f 2.8 24 to 70 on the D500 at f 2.8, 1/100 and iso 32,000 with much better results. no post
For you modern-day purists, I believe it is no longer called "The Last Supper", it is now "The Last Dinner".
jcboy3 wrote:
Do everyone a favor and get a camera that can shoot silently, rather than slap a mirror and mechanical shutter with every shot.
Get one with excellent in body stabilization, so you can shoot at low shutter speeds and low ISO.
And use lenses with large apertures as well, since you don't need deep DOF for paintings (f/2.8-4 FF equivalent is good).
Learn to do custom white balance, or use a color profiler, to get correct color.
And learn to do keystone correction in post processing.
Do everyone a favor and get a camera that can shoo... (
show quote)
Gosh, of all the suggestions here I think yours is a bit extreme. I think he was just looking for some tips for application with his current equipment not to spend several thousand dollars on a new camera and high end lenses.
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.