Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register ☰
The Attic
"Seven Steps to Destroy a Democracy"
Page <<first <prev 3 of 3
Mar 15, 2022 12:11:28   #
idaholover Loc: Nampa ID
 
RichieC wrote:
Pure democracy is simply by definition the very same as mob rule... what could go wrong in mob rule? - First thing, to defend it, is idiots will say its the "peoples will" - and stand resolutely behind it...


Unless of course the mob turns on them or something or someone they hold dear- then the evils of the mob will all anybody will hear from then on.


đź‘ŤAbsolutely

Reply
Mar 15, 2022 12:21:44   #
Fotoartist Loc: Detroit, Michigan
 
"NO PROOF HAS BEEN SUBMITTED!" How do you obtain proof in your world?

Evidence was submitted, reams of it. Evidence has to be adjudicated upon to render proof. NO cases were adjudicated on the evidence. Some skulls are thicker than others.

If you have an opinion based on ignorance of the facts AND the law it is probably better to just keep quiet rather than to proclaim your lack of intelligence to the world.

Reply
Mar 15, 2022 12:31:10   #
BooIsMyCat Loc: Somewhere
 
idaholover wrote:
There’s no way on God’s green earth he got anywhere near 81 million votes



Well, weren't ALL votes, in ALL cities/towns, in ALL states, counted and recounted?

Weren't votes in question audited, multiple times?

Weren't votes counted AND certified by BOTH Democrats AND Republicans?

Who was able to pull off such a widespread scam that your daddy told you would happen FIVE MONTHS BEFORE the election? His crystal ball should be worth TRILLIONS!

How come NOT ONE person has come forth saying they were part of said scam and had the proof to back that statement up? Do you also believe that ALL involved in your conspiracy will take their knowledge of said fraud to their graves and not a one of them would flip for a few million dollars? Oh... the conspiracy just keeps on growing!

How come your daddy felt he had to contact the governor of Georgia and beg him to find more votes in his favor?

You chump monkeys won't answer these questions because you can't!


Try thinking on your own.

Reply
 
 
Mar 15, 2022 13:14:37   #
Curtis_Lowe Loc: Georgia
 
Kmgw9v wrote:
One big step in destroying the Democracy, not mentioned by Blow, is to have a Presidential candidate who loses an legitimate election propagate a fraud—a Big Lie, in which he states that he won the election, when all court cases, and Constitutional law, and all other evidence is clear that he lost the election by the majority of voters, and the electoral count; and he repeats this Big Lie, until his supporters believe him (even though he has a history of untruths, and actually believe the election was stolen from him. This is a major step in destroying the electoral process, which once was a bedrock of democracy. When the voters accept this Big Lie, despite all evidence to the contrary, the integrity of elections is forever destroyed, and the country is lost. It becomes a third world country where autocracy, and the will of a losing liar takes over.
One big step in destroying the Democracy, not ment... (show quote)


Isn't that what Stacy Abrams did in Georgia and Hillary R Clinton did in the US election against the big bad orange man?

Reply
Mar 15, 2022 13:59:37   #
idaholover Loc: Nampa ID
 
Fotoartist wrote:
"NO PROOF HAS BEEN SUBMITTED!" How do you obtain proof in your world?

Evidence was submitted, reams of it. Evidence has to be adjudicated upon to render proof. NO cases were adjudicated on the evidence. Some skulls are thicker than others.

If you have an opinion based on ignorance of the facts AND the law it is probably better to just keep quiet rather than to proclaim your lack of intelligence to the world.


đź‘Ť

Reply
Mar 15, 2022 14:00:33   #
idaholover Loc: Nampa ID
 
Curtis_Lowe wrote:
Isn't that what Stacy Abrams did in Georgia and Hillary R Clinton did in the US election against the big bad orange man?



Reply
Mar 15, 2022 15:22:49   #
thom w Loc: San Jose, CA
 
Fotoartist wrote:
"NO PROOF HAS BEEN SUBMITTED!" How do you obtain proof in your world?

Evidence was submitted, reams of it. Evidence has to be adjudicated upon to render proof. NO cases were adjudicated on the evidence. Some skulls are thicker than others.

If you have an opinion based on ignorance of the facts AND the law it is probably better to just keep quiet rather than to proclaim your lack of intelligence to the world.


The fact that you know that and continue to post as you do is perplexing.

Reply
 
 
Mar 15, 2022 15:36:47   #
Fotoartist Loc: Detroit, Michigan
 
BooIsMyCat wrote:
Well, weren't ALL votes, in ALL cities/towns, in ALL states, counted and recounted?

Weren't votes in question audited, multiple times?

Weren't votes counted AND certified by BOTH Democrats AND Republicans?

Who was able to pull off such a widespread scam that your daddy told you would happen FIVE MONTHS BEFORE the election? His crystal ball should be worth TRILLIONS!

How come NOT ONE person has come forth saying they were part of said scam and had the proof to back that statement up? Do you also believe that ALL involved in your conspiracy will take their knowledge of said fraud to their graves and not a one of them would flip for a few million dollars? Oh... the conspiracy just keeps on growing!

How come your daddy felt he had to contact the governor of Georgia and beg him to find more votes in his favor?

You chump monkeys won't answer these questions because you can't!


Try thinking on your own.
Well, weren't ALL votes, in ALL cities/towns, in A... (show quote)


I look at the facts and draw obvious conclusions. Recounting illegal votes mixed in with the legal cast will not change the count, duh!

The Real Big Lie seeks to suppress the fact that all approx. three dozen of the lawsuits over the presidential election that addressed the integrity or constitutionality of the electoral counting process were left unadjudicated.

They were not heard for procedural reasons: late filing, lack of time to hear them, the wrong defendant, the procedural finding that challenges had to begin at the lowest courts and wind their way upwards, or lack of standing to hear the cases. Most of these objections were spurious and cowardly and ignored the search for the truth to the allegations.

The fact is, the judiciary abdicated its duty as a coequal branch of American government for political reasons.

Reply
Mar 15, 2022 15:45:22   #
thom w Loc: San Jose, CA
 
BooIsMyCat wrote:
Well, weren't ALL votes, in ALL cities/towns, in ALL states, counted and recounted?

Weren't votes in question audited, multiple times?

Weren't votes counted AND certified by BOTH Democrats AND Republicans?

Who was able to pull off such a widespread scam that your daddy told you would happen FIVE MONTHS BEFORE the election? His crystal ball should be worth TRILLIONS!

How come NOT ONE person has come forth saying they were part of said scam and had the proof to back that statement up? Do you also believe that ALL involved in your conspiracy will take their knowledge of said fraud to their graves and not a one of them would flip for a few million dollars? Oh... the conspiracy just keeps on growing!

How come your daddy felt he had to contact the governor of Georgia and beg him to find more votes in his favor?

You chump monkeys won't answer these questions because you can't!


Try thinking on your own.
Well, weren't ALL votes, in ALL cities/towns, in A... (show quote)


"Try thinking on your own."

If he does that, and he injures himself, it will be on you.

Reply
Mar 15, 2022 15:47:16   #
thom w Loc: San Jose, CA
 
Fotoartist wrote:
I look at the facts and draw obvious conclusions. Recounting illegal votes mixed in with the legal cast will not change the count, duh!

The Real Big Lie seeks to suppress the fact that all approx. three dozen of the lawsuits over the presidential election that addressed the integrity or constitutionality of the electoral counting process were left unadjudicated.

They were not heard for procedural reasons: late filing, lack of time to hear them, the wrong defendant, the procedural finding that challenges had to begin at the lowest courts and wind their way upwards, or lack of standing to hear the cases. Most of these objections were spurious and cowardly and ignored the search for the truth to the allegations.

The fact is, the judiciary abdicated its duty as a coequal branch of American government for political reasons.
I look at the facts and draw obvious conclusions. ... (show quote)


That's how the court system works.

Reply
Mar 15, 2022 21:08:59   #
BooIsMyCat Loc: Somewhere
 
Fotoartist wrote:
I look at the facts and draw obvious conclusions. Recounting illegal votes mixed in with the legal cast will not change the count, duh!

The Real Big Lie seeks to suppress the fact that all approx. three dozen of the lawsuits over the presidential election that addressed the integrity or constitutionality of the electoral counting process were left unadjudicated.

They were not heard for procedural reasons: late filing, lack of time to hear them, the wrong defendant, the procedural finding that challenges had to begin at the lowest courts and wind their way upwards, or lack of standing to hear the cases. Most of these objections were spurious and cowardly and ignored the search for the truth to the allegations.

The fact is, the judiciary abdicated its duty as a coequal branch of American government for political reasons.
I look at the facts and draw obvious conclusions. ... (show quote)




Recounting illegal votes?
You look at the facts and draw obvious conclusions?


I repeat what you have yet to answer:

Well, weren't ALL votes, in ALL cities/towns, in ALL states, counted and recounted?

Weren't votes in question audited, multiple times?

Weren't votes counted AND certified by BOTH Democrats AND Republicans?

Who was able to pull off such a widespread scam that your daddy told you would happen FIVE MONTHS BEFORE the election? His crystal ball should be worth TRILLIONS!

How come NOT ONE person has come forth saying they were part of said scam and had the proof to back that statement up? Do you also believe that ALL involved in your conspiracy will take their knowledge of said fraud to their graves and not a one of them would flip for a few million dollars? Oh... the conspiracy just keeps on growing!

How come your daddy felt he had to contact the governor of Georgia and beg him to find more votes in his favor?

You chump monkeys won't answer these questions because you can't!


PS... You don't draw any type of conclusions with crayons and it's obvious that is what you are trying to do.

Reply
 
 
Mar 15, 2022 21:12:22   #
Racmanaz Loc: Sunny Tucson!
 
BooIsMyCat wrote:
Recounting illegal votes?
You look at the facts and draw obvious conclusions?


I repeat what you have yet to answer:

Well, weren't ALL votes, in ALL cities/towns, in ALL states, counted and recounted?

Weren't votes in question audited, multiple times?

Weren't votes counted AND certified by BOTH Democrats AND Republicans?

Who was able to pull off such a widespread scam that your daddy told you would happen FIVE MONTHS BEFORE the election? His crystal ball should be worth TRILLIONS!

How come NOT ONE person has come forth saying they were part of said scam and had the proof to back that statement up? Do you also believe that ALL involved in your conspiracy will take their knowledge of said fraud to their graves and not a one of them would flip for a few million dollars? Oh... the conspiracy just keeps on growing!

How come your daddy felt he had to contact the governor of Georgia and beg him to find more votes in his favor?

You chump monkeys won't answer these questions because you can't!


PS... You don't draw any type of conclusions with crayons and it's obvious that is what you are trying to do.
Recounting illegal votes? br You look at the facts... (show quote)


What did Trump mean "find votes"?

Reply
Mar 16, 2022 07:38:04   #
wilpharm Loc: Oklahoma
 
Curtis_Lowe wrote:
Isn't that what Stacy Abrams did in Georgia and Hillary R Clinton did in the US election against the big bad orange man?



Reply
Mar 16, 2022 07:40:56   #
BooIsMyCat Loc: Somewhere
 
Racmanaz wrote:
What did Trump mean "find votes"?



Figures you're the one who didn't get the memo.

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2021/nov/02/trump-georgia-elections-official-brad-raffensperger

Reply
Mar 16, 2022 09:48:03   #
Racmanaz Loc: Sunny Tucson!
 
BooIsMyCat wrote:
Figures you're the one who didn't get the memo.

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2021/nov/02/trump-georgia-elections-official-brad-raffensperger


No, I'm asking YOU what did Trump mean when he said "find the votes"? In other words how did you interpret it?

Reply
Page <<first <prev 3 of 3
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
The Attic
Home | Latest Digest | Back to Top | All Sections
Contact us | Privacy policy | Terms of use | DMCA
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.