Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
To Z or not to Z
Page <prev 2 of 4 next> last>>
Feb 11, 2022 09:16:54   #
Bultaco Loc: Aiken, SC
 
Tomfl101 wrote:
Weight will not be a factor going mirrorless. This big difference for me is in focusing at apertures 2.8 or wider, and the eye-focus capability. Your percentage of sharp images will definitely increase. If your main subjects are still objects, I wouldn’t bother with the upgrade.


You have a long 2.8 lens?

Reply
Feb 11, 2022 09:45:33   #
Pierre1965
 
CHG_CANON wrote:
You have two premium DSLRs, easily expected to deliver superior results for the foreseeable future (aka the next decade+). Full-frame equipment will remain the largest and heaviest, even if newer & lighter weight lenses are developed for the slightly smaller full-frame cameras that don't contain mirrors. BTW, there isn't even a rumor yet for a Z8 model. The D850 gives Nikon's best / final results from a DSLR, primarily a 45MP sensor. The Z7II is nearly exactly the same camera, and sensor size, within a mirrorless package. None of these various GAS ideas are really going to improve your overall results nor address usage issues related to long-term shooting with heavy and large equipment.
You have two premium DSLRs, easily expected to del... (show quote)


Paul, You have a concise and direct manner of hitting the nail directly on the head. I have the same issue as this gentleman and I appreciate your insight as well as your photos on flickr. Thanks Jacques.

Reply
Feb 11, 2022 10:17:08   #
CHG_CANON Loc: the Windy City
 
Pierre1965 wrote:
Paul, You have a concise and direct manner of hitting the nail directly on the head. I have the same issue as this gentleman and I appreciate your insight as well as your photos on flickr. Thanks Jacques.


Thank you Jacques! I believe in mirrorless digital, but I don't believe dropping excellent equipment to simply by new excellent equipment without a mirror.

Reply
 
 
Feb 11, 2022 10:23:39   #
TriX Loc: Raleigh, NC
 
Bayou wrote:
…Nobody makes adequate birding lenses in the DX format…


No help for Nikon users, but Fuji is introducing an XF 150-600 in crop format later this year. Paired with any of their 1Lb ASP-C bodies, and you might have a substantially lighter BIF package - have to wait to see what it weighs.

Reply
Feb 11, 2022 10:36:30   #
cjc2 Loc: Hellertown PA
 
TriX wrote:
No help for Nikon users, but Fuji is introducing an XF 150-600 in crop format later this year. Paired with any of their 1Lb ASP-C bodies, and you might have a substantially lighter BIF package - have to wait to see what it weighs.


There's a couple of, what could be, very interesting longer lenses coming in the Z mount from Nikon in the, hopefully, not to distant future as well. Best of luck to all.

Reply
Feb 11, 2022 11:06:14   #
jerryc41 Loc: Catskill Mts of NY
 
Here you go -

https://versus.com/en/nikon-d850-vs-nikon-z7
https://photographylife.com/nikon-z-7-vs-nikon-d850
https://www.imaging-resource.com/cameras/nikon/d850/vs/nikon/z7/
https://camerajabber.com/nikon-z7-vs-d850-which-is-best/
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rXRaNkFfHNs

Reply
Feb 11, 2022 11:26:24   #
PACSMAN Loc: MA
 
zacksoccer wrote:
Looking for advise from all the Hogs. Current equipment base is a Nikon D750 and Nikon D500. Lots of lens ranges to accompany. As I age, I find it harder and harder to shoot BIF for long periods of time with longer lenses. I have used a gimble but am not totally happy with that solution. Am now thinking of changing to a Nikon D850 or a Nikon Z series (probably a Z8). Is there a significant weight tradeoff by going mirrorless and am I trading other benefits by moving from DSLR to Mirrorless format. I know that is the future direction (Nikon just discontinued the D500) but wonder if the 850 will give me more benefits than the Z series. Am not doing any video work, just still imagery.
Looking for advise from all the Hogs. Current equi... (show quote)


I had an 850 and several lenses. I sold everything and purchased a Z7II and new lenses. I can only tell you my experience. My backpack went from 28 pounds to 17 so for me it was well worth it. I really like the Z7. For lenses I have 16-30 and 70-200 with 2X converter. I don't see any image degradation using the converter. I have the 24-120 on order.

Reply
 
 
Feb 11, 2022 11:30:26   #
cjc2 Loc: Hellertown PA
 
PACSMAN wrote:
I had an 850 and several lenses. I sold everything and purchased a Z7II and new lenses. I can only tell you my experience. My backpack went from 28 pounds to 17 so for me it was well worth it. I really like the Z7. For lenses I have 16-30 and 70-200 with 2X converter. I don't see any image degradation using the converter. I have the 24-120 on order.


You will find the 24-120 Z mount to be an excellent choice. I really like mine! Best of luck.

Reply
Feb 11, 2022 11:33:59   #
PACSMAN Loc: MA
 
cjc2 wrote:
You will find the 24-120 Z mount to be an excellent choice. I really like mine! Best of luck.


Thanks. Really looking forward to getting it. I had the F mount version but find the z lenses so muck better.

Reply
Feb 11, 2022 12:28:43   #
JFCoupe Loc: Kent, Washington
 
You have great equipment already and as stated above, none of the mirrorless gear will immediately improve you images. UNLESS, you are not getting sharp images due to camera shake related to size and age.

Consider, Olympus M43 equipment. My 300mm f4 Pro lens (600mm FFE) is about the same size and weight that my Canon 70-200 f2.8 L IS II lens was. And the OMS 100-400 is also a very good lens. The 150-400 with 1.4 TC built in is even better image quality from what I have read but in short supply currently.

For BIF, the M43 lenses will give you the biggest weight and hand holding gain.

Reply
Feb 11, 2022 13:22:26   #
BigOldArt Loc: Seminole, FL
 
zacksoccer wrote:
Looking for advise from all the Hogs. As I age, I find it harder and harder to shoot BIF for long periods of time with longer lenses. .


What are you going to do with the pictures you take?
As strictly an amateur, I occasionally print 4*6 on inkjet. I usually display pix on a 27 inch UHD monitor, on a 40 inch HD TV, or a 65 inch UHD TV.
I considered getting a camera with replaceable lenses. But I bought a NIKON p900 which zooms to 83X. It does not take location data from the cell phone even though it has GPS & WiFi. For BIF though, you will not be doing that indoors and will be outside long enough for the GPS to work.

I did not verify this but I was told that the p900 weighed less than the equivalent 2000mm lens.

Reply
 
 
Feb 11, 2022 14:15:15   #
SuperflyTNT Loc: Manassas VA
 
zacksoccer wrote:
Looking for advise from all the Hogs. Current equipment base is a Nikon D750 and Nikon D500. Lots of lens ranges to accompany. As I age, I find it harder and harder to shoot BIF for long periods of time with longer lenses. I have used a gimble but am not totally happy with that solution. Am now thinking of changing to a Nikon D850 or a Nikon Z series (probably a Z8). Is there a significant weight tradeoff by going mirrorless and am I trading other benefits by moving from DSLR to Mirrorless format. I know that is the future direction (Nikon just discontinued the D500) but wonder if the 850 will give me more benefits than the Z series. Am not doing any video work, just still imagery.
Looking for advise from all the Hogs. Current equi... (show quote)


Well there is no Z8 so that part is problematic. And you’re really not gonna get a big enough weight savings to make much of a difference. I just sold my D500 and I’m totally mirrorless now. I never used a tripod with the D500 and 200-500mm lens. Mostly I’d shoot handheld, but when I was shooting in a situation like a rookery where I might want to train my lens on something like a nest for a long period I would use a monopod with the Wimberly monogimbal. Right now while I wait for my Z9 I’m using my Olympus E-M1X with the 100-400mm lens which I can easily handhold all day.

Reply
Feb 11, 2022 14:30:44   #
SuperflyTNT Loc: Manassas VA
 
larryepage wrote:
There is no question that the manufacturers have decided that future equipment will be built to the mirrorless design. There is also no question that there are some benefits provided by that design. My personal belief is that benefits claimed in the area of weight and size have been exaggerated.

Your two DSLRs have different user interfaces. I don't know if that is a big deal for you or not. The Z6 and Z7 have interfaces like your D750. The Z9 interface is like your D500, as is that of the D850. Shooting the D850 is exactly like shooting the D500, but the camera is a little heavier and slightly larger.

I have just started exploring IR photography using a converted D90 that I just purchased. If this develops into a serious pursuit for me, I'll be looking toward a Z8 conversion, provided that it is ever actually introduced and that it has the professional interface of the D500 and D850. The mirrorless design offers very concrete operational benefits in achieving focus while still using the viewfinder when doing IR photography.

No one can or should tell you what camera to buy to meet your specific needs. You will need to investigate for yourself whether any particular camera will address your shooting challenges.
There is no question that the manufacturers have d... (show quote)


Mirrorless is the way to go for IR conversions. I bought an old Panasonic GH2 and had it converted. If I start doing more I’ll get the G85 that I never use converted. Actually mine is full spectrum and I have filters for a few different wavelengths. The biggest advantage with mirrorless is no need for focus adjustment. I can use any of my M4/3 lenses with accurate focus. I just had to buy filters large enough and use step down rings. The most important thing I learned is to shoot raw and use the camera manufacturer’s software to set white balance before going to LR/PS.

Reply
Feb 11, 2022 14:36:04   #
SuperflyTNT Loc: Manassas VA
 
Bayou wrote:
The best way to go (significantly) lighter is to go bridge. The Sony RX10 MkIV is the clear winner there.

The other way is to go Micro 4/3, but that format may have a limited future. Only Olympus and Panasonic offer M4/3.

Nobody makes adequate birding lenses in the DX format, so you're still stuck with huge FX lenses there, though you do get 50% more "reach" which would allow you to use lighter, shorter lenses. I assume you've tried a mid range tele (300 to 400mm) on your D500?
The best way to go (significantly) lighter is to g... (show quote)


So two manufacturers make cameras with the same M4/3 mount? That’s twice as many that make cameras in any other mount.

Reply
Feb 11, 2022 14:37:46   #
bocaphotogal
 
zacksoccer wrote:
Looking for advise from all the Hogs. Current equipment base is a Nikon D750 and Nikon D500. Lots of lens ranges to accompany. As I age, I find it harder and harder to shoot BIF for long periods of time with longer lenses. I have used a gimble but am not totally happy with that solution. Am now thinking of changing to a Nikon D850 or a Nikon Z series (probably a Z8). Is there a significant weight tradeoff by going mirrorless and am I trading other benefits by moving from DSLR to Mirrorless format. I know that is the future direction (Nikon just discontinued the D500) but wonder if the 850 will give me more benefits than the Z series. Am not doing any video work, just still imagery.
Looking for advise from all the Hogs. Current equi... (show quote)


This is just my experience--I have a Nikon 750 and Z 6-ii. By the time I put a lens on the Z with the adapter, I'm finding it's heavy which was exactly what I wanted to avoid. Using the mirrorless has been a real challenge for me since I'm not very technical and all the tracking options are confusing. I've gone back to using my 750 which feels more comfortable. Some mirrorless lens are backordered which doesn't help either. I took a virtual class on using the Z which added to my confusion. Best wishes.

Reply
Page <prev 2 of 4 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.