Protection against the Covid 19 virus.
Feb 9, 2022 17:51:24 #
Feb 9, 2022 18:05:37 #
chrissybabe wrote:
The chances of you winning the State lottery is mu... (show quote)
Well, if I had a choice between taking a medication whose efficacy was low vs. a vaccine whose efficacy was high, sounds like a pretty simple choice to me.
Feb 9, 2022 18:12:00 #
Reuss Griffiths wrote:
Most of the "scientists" associated with the COVID issure are giving science a bad name. The first issue one must understand about science is that it is NEVER decided by consensus. Scientific facts are determined by the scientific method which involves stating a hypothesis, then testing it with carefully designed and repeatable experiments which either prove the thesis true or false. Once proven, opinions to the contrary are moot.
Love all these folks who keep playing keep-away with the term "Science", going from general to specific even to the inane. It is like playing "doctor".
Even your protestation in your last line is an example of the uncontrolled slide.
Actual "Science" demands to be continually tested. There is no actual stopping point. The explanations will always continue to be corrected. The moment anyone says that this is the exact definition, they will face the "unanswered question". And off it goes.
Feb 9, 2022 18:22:49 #
David Martin
Loc: Cary, NC
Reuss Griffiths wrote:
Once proven, opinions to the contrary are moot.
Until someone else comes along and proves it to be wrong.
Think Newton → Einstein.
Feb 9, 2022 18:28:26 #
Some of you seem to suggest that you should "research" Ivermectin and then decide if you want to get it. Well, that's not the way I handle my medical issues. Unless I have a damn good reason not to, I will trust my doctors and let them decide.
Feb 9, 2022 19:00:10 #
Smudgey wrote:
I definitely think you should take it. It would make one less person passing around miss information.
Ex who is Miss information? And why should she be passed around?
Feb 9, 2022 19:10:48 #
chrissybabe
Loc: New Zealand
If you want to find out more about Ivermectin (unless you are a scientist or a doctor who has already made up your mind) go into utube and type in 'John Campbell Ivermectin Trial" and have a watch. Only 13 mins long.
The only thing worse than somebody who lets political concerns govern their thinking is a scientist who has a closed mind.
The only thing worse than somebody who lets political concerns govern their thinking is a scientist who has a closed mind.
Feb 9, 2022 20:41:28 #
Cyberkinesis70
Loc: Northern Colorado
GregS wrote:
It is totally apparent that you didn't read the whole citation. I hope you and your pony are alive and well.Not true. It is an FDA approved drug for humans. Just not the amount that a Vet would give a horse like what you hear on the news. I did some research and quit listening to the main stream media.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33278625/
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33278625/
Feb 9, 2022 20:54:32 #
Cyberkinesis70
Loc: Northern Colorado
chrissybabe wrote:
Hmm, so Merck the manufacturer of Invermecton wouldn't make any money if they could sell it as snake oil for everything from athlete's foot to pertussis? Give me a break. Why would they cut their own throat? I have a whole lot of disregard for Pharma, but to say they would pass up profit is simply insane.The chances of you winning the State lottery is mu... (show quote)
Feb 9, 2022 21:08:20 #
David Martin wrote:
Well, you may be interested to know that: br Iverm... (show quote)
Yes, I believe the CDC and much of the medical community is uninformed or turns a blind eye, or is plain out lying about this product. To say a medicine is for only a limited number of problems when there is evidence it could be effective against covid is just plain nuts. Just look at the #1 blood thinner that was used for many years -- it was basically rat poison! Things can't always be put down because someone disfavors them. Of course if you don't believe big pharma is controlling much of what is going on with covid, then you just aren't paying attention. Look at the record profits the drug companies have racked up! As they say -- follow the money!
Feb 9, 2022 21:08:52 #
David Martin wrote:
Well, you may be interested to know that: br Iverm... (show quote)
Yes this is true! And it is great if you have worms. It is not useful for viruses. This is a proven fact. Except as maybe a placebo for the anti-vaxers. I wish them luck with that. The doctors that developed the Covid vaccines deserve a Nobel prize!
Feb 9, 2022 21:15:15 #
Bridges wrote:
Yes, I believe the CDC and much of the medical com... (show quote)
“There is evidence it could be effective against Covid?” Really?? Point to one valid double blind study that concludes that. I don’t think so.
Feb 9, 2022 21:15:46 #
KindaSpikey wrote:
This was directed at readers who can recognize the humor in it. There's no mention of the "Horse dewormer" being used by humans, the "joke" is that no HORSES got sick! (can't believe I needed to explain this)!
It seems you touched on a topic of interest that trumped your joke for some.
Feb 9, 2022 21:21:53 #
chrissybabe
Loc: New Zealand
Cyberkinesis70 wrote:
Hmm, so Merck the manufacturer of Invermecton wouldn't make any money if they could sell it as snake oil for everything from athlete's foot to pertussis? Give me a break. Why would they cut their own throat? I have a whole lot of disregard for Pharma, but to say they would pass up profit is simply insane.
You are one of those who needs to read AND understand what you are reading. Maybe the site I offered up came out too late for you to check it but in there they told you how much a dose of Ivermectin costs. The WHO pay something like 3c per dose. The packaging and delivery costs more than the drug. So yes Merck couldn't care less about making money from Ivermectin.
Feb 10, 2022 00:58:54 #
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.