Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
Nikkor Lens Choice
Page <prev 2 of 2
Nov 12, 2012 23:11:53   #
Bridges Loc: Memphis, Charleston SC, now Nazareth PA
 
MT Shooter wrote:
wizard wrote:
Question: Which would be the better choice for my D600 - the older AF-S 80-200 f2.8 or the newer AF-S 28-300 f3.5-5.6? I understand that the 28-300 will not give me aperature choices when used on my Nikon 35mm and I like the idea of fixed f2.8 over the zoom range as well as the sharpness the 80-200 offers, so I am leaning that way. On the other hand, the 28-300 zoom has VR and I probably would not need to carry any other lenses. Your thoughts would be appreciated.

Wizard


I sold my old Nikkor 80-200mm F2.8 D lens in favor of the Sigma 70-200mm F2.8 HSM as the Sigma was just as sharp and a LOT faster focusing at half the price of the newer Nikon 70-200mm F2.8 model.
As for the Nikkor 28-300mm? It permanently resides on one of my D800's all the time, an excellent all around lens that I find I use for at least 60% of my shooting under all conditions.
I also use it on my Nikon F5 for 35mm film work and the F5 will adjust the aperture in camera so the "G" is not an issue for me.
quote=wizard Question: Which would be the better... (show quote)


MT -- You just gave a plug to Sigma and they have been getting better every year it seems. Tamron and Tokina have both come up with some excellent lenses lately as well. My question: Why hasn't someone jumped in with a challenger to the Nikon 80-400 VR lens? That has to be one of Nikon's worst lenses ever. It is terribly slow to focus and often has to go fishing to find a focus spot. Tokina was working on one but at the last photo show, I was told by a rep. they have abandoned trying to produce one. I would like to have a lens in that range but not the Nikon.

Reply
Nov 12, 2012 23:36:58   #
SteveR Loc: Michigan
 
Tell me...how sharp is your AF-S 80-200? Ken Rockwell says it's the sharpest zoom Nikon has made and an overall sharp lens. You need to read the review, however, because he said that the lenses were inconsistent and he happened to pick out a good one. If you got a good one I wouldn't get rid of it.

Reply
Nov 13, 2012 00:27:00   #
TonyP Loc: New Zealand
 
SteveR wrote:
Tell me...how sharp is your AF-S 80-200? Ken Rockwell says it's the sharpest zoom Nikon has made and an overall sharp lens. You need to read the review, however, because he said that the lenses were inconsistent and he happened to pick out a good one. If you got a good one I wouldn't get rid of it.


Wonder what Ken Rockwell is on about sometimes. Never, ever read anywhere that anyone has had an issue with this lens. It was one of the most popular workhorses used by professionals in every sphere from War Zones to , .. wherever. Built like a tank, heavy but sharp and reliable. I wonder if he is perhaps referring to an over abused 2nd hand one perhaps.

Reply
 
 
Nov 13, 2012 00:32:05   #
TonyP Loc: New Zealand
 
Bridges wrote:
wizard wrote:
Question: Which would be the better choice for my D600 - the older AF-S 80-200 f2.8 or the newer AF-S 28-300 f3.5-5.6? I understand that the 28-300 will not give me aperature choices when used on my Nikon 35mm and I like the idea of fixed f2.8 over the zoom range as well as the sharpness the 80-200 offers, so I am leaning that way. On the other hand, the 28-300 zoom has VR and I probably would not need to carry any other lenses. Your thoughts would be appreciated.

Wizard


I played around with the new Nikon at the trade show in NYC two weeks ago. That would and will be my choice once they are available at the end of Nov. It is a constent f4. This makes the lens lighter than the f2.8 and 1000.00 cheaper. It also has their most advanced VR which the Nikon rep. claims at 5 f-stops. I would only suggest the 2.8 over the f4 if you felt you would ever use a 1.4, 1.7, or 2.0 teleconverter with the lens. In that case you would want to get as much initial light into the process as possible. The f-4 doesn't bother me with the newer cameras that can easily handle 800 ISO, and even 1600 ISO is perfectly usable. I shoot events with a D300 and a 16-85 lens that slides up to 5.6 and have never had a problem with noise.
quote=wizard Question: Which would be the better... (show quote)


Are you sure the 2.8 is compatible with a TC? If you mean the old f2.8 80-200, be very careful attaching a Nikon TC. I didnt think you could. Suggest you look at the compatibility chart on the Nikon website before using a TC with any zoom. You can easily end up destroying a lovely collection of glass if it ain't compatible.

Reply
Nov 13, 2012 10:10:47   #
lost_found
 
wizard wrote:
Thanks for you thoughts - I made a bid on an AF-S 80-200 2.8 lens today - hope I win the auction.


if you are not familier with auctions you need to be watching at the end as over 90% are won in the last minutes, or bid the highest number you would be willing to pay and relax and see what happens. good luck, great lens.

Reply
Nov 13, 2012 15:05:28   #
wizard Loc: Naples Florida
 
Thanks for the info and suggestions!

Reply
Page <prev 2 of 2
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.