“… one will notice that they will tend to see the world a little differently depending on the equipment they have at hand to capture the moment…”
David Farkas of Red Dot Review also has a very thorough review and many photos done with the CL and most of its lenses.
SkyKing wrote:
“… one will notice that they will tend to see the world a little differently depending on the equipment they have at hand to capture the moment…”
Some don't.
Some simply see the <whatever> camera as a tool,
the world looks the same. They take pictures.
View, imagine, compose, push the button on the image recording device.
Longshadow wrote:
Some don't.
Some simply see the <whatever> camera as a tool,
the world looks the same. They take pictures.
View, imagine, compose, push the button on the image recording device.
Actually my cameras were never tools. They are all toys.
When GAS hits me for something expensive, it usually means I have to save up for it. Loose change at the end of the week, bottle deposit money, etc., all goes into my piggybank. It is surprising how fast it fills up....
Even so, it takes some time to get the money together. Which helps to not spend it on items I don't really need:
It has happened several times now, that by the time I had enough money in my piggybank, I had forgotten what I was saving for!
Going out for dinner and a movie or play with my husband, proved to be a good substitute for the forgotten item!
Canisdirus wrote:
Heh...Leica is a pure marketing genius of a company.
That system has not been relevant since the late 60's....and yet...they keep finding suckers to part with their coin.
Remember...it's not about better images with Leica...buy a canon or sony for that.
It's all about being SEEN with a Leica in your hand.
Yeah, that's pretty much the case. If you want a better camera, other brands can be a better pick.
The Leica lenses are good. Whether they are better is a case of which lens, which format, which camera, and what aperture are used. In short, if ya got 'em, use 'em. Lots of companies make great lenses these days.
I don't need to be seen with a Leica logo on my person. I used to put black tape over the Nikon and Canon logos on my SLRs. It said, "Don't ask." Why? Because the brand of pots and pans does not make the cook.
Just an idea: After I sold my Leica M camera set a number of years ago, I did have a Leica GAS attack, but did not want to do a full Leica M dive again. So, I am the proud owner of a Leica IIIF and 3 of the classic LTM lenses — 5.0cm Summicron, 3.5cm Summaron, and 9.0cm Elmar. (Had CLA from YYe.). They are a whole lot of fun to use, and can capture some very nice results if used correctly. Maybe I just enjoy the challenge of making images using very small vintage gear, and knowing that if the results aren’t right it’s not the camera’s fault. (If the legends could do it so well 70 years ago, let’s see how I can do!!) But, it might be a worthwhile thought to look at top of the line vintage Leica’s as well as current ‘branded’ ones?
Nah. I want a Hasselblad h6c. I also want to take a 6 minute weihgtless ride in Jeff Bezos rocket. But, I'll have to wait for my tax return.
If this makes you happy and you have money to burn, go for it but it is really the quality of your photos (composition, lighting, etc.) that will make you "unique" as a photographer. I have always been drawn to Leica rangefinder cameras (aren't we all) but could never justify the cost. No one is ever going to look at your photos and say "Wow! That was taken on a Leica." It is interesting that you already have two high end cameras from two different manufacturers and are now getting ready to start a third system. You said you had a "modest" selection of lenses. It would seem to me that expanding your selection of lenses for the systems you already have would be a better way to spend your money but to each his own.
Les Brown wrote:
Nah. I want a Hasselblad h6c. I also want to take a 6 minute weihgtless ride in Jeff Bezos rocket. But, I'll have to wait for my tax return.
And I have to check my checking account make sure I have enough money to pay the tax when I file the return.
47greyfox
Loc: on the edge of the Colorado front range
Longshadow wrote:
If I bought everything "I want", I'd need another house.
Even, that fix would be considered a temporary. Eh? 🥴😵💫😳😏
47greyfox wrote:
Even, that fix would be considered a temporary. Eh? 🥴😵💫😳😏
Probably!
There would always be something new.
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.