Wein Safe Synch sounds perfect!! Thanks
I never have occasion to use a pop-up flash. I always have an auxiliary flash available with my gear.
Camera companies seem to think cameras with on board flash is out of style witch is riduclous, a camera with an on board flash is like an artist with an extra brush.
A witch is possibly riduclous, whatever that means.
fantom wrote:
About two times a year I say to myself, "It would be nice to have a built in flash", but about 10+ times a year I say to myself, "I'm glad my camera is well sealed and doesn't have a built in flash."
Of course that isn't a problem if you don't shoot outside ---- or your upstairs neighbor's toilet doesn't leak.
There are several cameras on the market that are both weatherproof, and have built in flashes for the rugged outdoorsmen. My Pentax K-5 and K-70 are but two of them. I am sure their are others.
Ched49 wrote:
Camera companies seem to think cameras with on board flash is out of style witch is riduclous, a camera with an on board flash is like an artist with an extra brush.
I never liked the built in flash.
Bison Bud wrote:
Seems like new camera bodies with a built in flash are becoming a thing of the past, especially in the upper performance level bodies. While I realize that I can always add a hot shoe flash and the ability of a built in one is limited when compared to what can be done with the add on and/or use of slaves, I still think a built in flash is a nice feature to have available. Frankly, if I know I'm going to be doing flash photography, I will indeed use my speedlight setup, but I really don't carry it along regularly and the use of the built in flash has saved my butt a number of times. This is especially true when I simply need a fill flash to expose the subject rather than the background and I've even been rather successful using the built in flash for some low key photography of flowers, etc. Anyway, a built in flash is far from useless in my opinion and since the manufacturers seem to be moving away from them as an option, I was wondering how others out there might feel about them. Good luck and good shooting to all.
Seems like new camera bodies with a built in flash... (
show quote)
Not a fan of Red-eye and never purchase a camera with built in flash.
EJMcD wrote:
Not a fan of Red-eye and never purchase a camera with built in flash.
Me too but sometimes you just have to accept one as you don't have enough money to buy the one without the built in flash.
EJMcD wrote:
Not a fan of Red-eye and never purchase a camera with built in flash.
All of mine have built in flashes but I use a speed light. Having a built in flash would not stop me from purchasing.
EJMcD wrote:
Not a fan of Red-eye and never purchase a camera with built in flash.
Never had a problem with red eye with people or pets with newer cameras, a flash comes in handy for portraits and you can adjust the amount of light for the flash. oh well, i guess it depends on what you like to shoot.
People are falling for the propaganda from camera companies....a camera that doesn't have a flash is now considered a "PROFESSIONAL CAMERA" or for people who don't know how to use a flash.
Ched49 wrote:
People are falling for the propaganda from camera companies....a camera that doesn't have a flash is now considered a "PROFESSIONAL CAMERA" or for people who don't know how to use a flash.
Yeh, and yer pitchurs will be much better without it.
EJMcD wrote:
Not a fan of Red-eye and never purchase a camera with built in flash.
This is the thing that I can't comprehend: red eyes. Obviously anyone talking about red eyes must not know how to use their built-in flash.
All you have to do is read your camera manual and learn how to reduce the output of the flash, and the use of a diffuser. I have a Lumiquest diffuser just for that purpose. A tiny piece of equipment that you can carry in your shirt pocket. No red eyes, no harsh frontal light on the subject's face.
Granted I prefer the use of my speedlights on a bracket above my camera where I can tilt and swing from horizontal to vertical, but for those instances when I can't be bothered with carrying all that equipment, your built-in camera flash is always ready for you at a moment's notice, and no red eyes.
Robert1 wrote:
This is the thing that I can't comprehend: red eyes. Obviously anyone talking about red eyes must not know how to use their built-in flash.
All you have to do is read your camera manual and learn how to reduce the output of the flash, and the use of a diffuser. I have a Lumiquest diffuser just for that purpose. A tiny piece of equipment that you can carry in your shirt pocket. No red eyes, no harsh frontal light on the subject's face.
Granted I prefer the use of my speedlights on a bracket above my camera where I can tilt and swing from horizontal to vertical, but for those instances when I can't be bothered with carrying all that equipment, your built-in camera flash is always ready for you at a moment's notice, and no red eyes.
This is the thing that I can't comprehend: red eye... (
show quote)
Your obviously mistaken. I've been using cameras and reading camera manuals since 1958 and know quite well what a built-in flash can and can't do. I will never buy a camera with one. Off camera flash is always superior. My opinion and my preference. Enjoy yours.
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.