Longshadow wrote:
Interesting.
I thought it was a site for those interested in photography to display images, exchange technique, and converse.
Not solely for education in the art of photography.
Perception.
And to learn all we can. That's what I need.
rook2c4 wrote:
If a posted image receives 3 pages of praises, then perhaps you have failed to see what all those other people are seeing.
I like that way of thinking!
--
yssirk123 wrote:
Hi Rick. Have you ever posted any of your own pictures on this site?
Typical UHH lack of initiative. Why do you ask Rick ? Why don’t you just look at the public records ? Below is the only subject Rick has posted. Nothing embarrassing:
.
Rick’s posted pic of his puppy
rook2c4 wrote:
If a posted image receives 3 pages of praises, then perhaps you have failed to see what all those other people are seeing.
ROTFLMFAO
I could post a plagiarized Steiglitz and garner three pages about everything I’ve done wrong.
I think I am an example of at least some photographers. I do photography because I enjoy it. I enjoy recording examples of nature that to me are interesting or beautiful or both. I also enjoy using photo equipment. While I expect to improve over time, enjoyment trumps achievement for me. While I have not posted any pictures yet, when I do the motive will be to share what I think are some attractive scenes of nature. If you don’t agree that’s OK. I hope UGG is heterogenous enough that all of us don’t have to be acting like we are earning another degree.
Frank
Rick from NY wrote:
It is my understanding that replies to posts in this section are expected to be not critical of an image and that criticisms of photos are restricted to the “Critique” section where posters solicit negative as well as positive comments. I understand the thinking that such a forum is designed to be a place to display work one is proud of and looking for ego stroking, but it troubles me that 3 pages of “great shots”, “ 👍s” and “well dones” in response to clearly inferior photos may do the poster more harm than good. I’m not talking about subjective analysis of a particular image. Rather I am referring to photos that are unintentionally out of focus, over sharpened to the point where the halos become the subject, unintentional skewed horizons, unintentional color shifts and other technical issues like a tree growing out of the subject’s head” that are NOT subjective. If a member posts a photo he/she is proud of looking for affirmation and experienced photographers clearly see that the image lacks sharpness, commenting “nice set” will not allow the poster to learn how to improve.
Again - I understand the desire to be supportive of such posters and the reluctance to say something “not nice” as my mother warned me not to do, but reinforcing demonstrably poor technique prevents a shooter from improving. I really don’t have a great solution for this problem, other than to say nothing in response to a post. Anyone else see this as a problem preventing growth in photography skills?
It is my understanding that replies to posts in th... (
show quote)
There are many skill levels.
I acknowledge a post positively of those who post in the gallery.
At least they are willing to post what they have done.
In fact I really like many of the "imperfect" posts for reasons outside of technical reasons.
So for those of us who love to take and share our efforts, though not perfect in other's eyes, I salute you and thank you for posting.
Please continue to do so.
Yep, just keep keeping on!
John N
Loc: HP14 3QF Stokenchurch, UK
Not noticed it at all. But I do look in on the 'For your Consideration' forum - and post there.
I generally feel that the replies are useful, from names that are writ large among the UHH fraternity, but are very considered and not afraid to criticise.
It's not really meant for a 'family' shot with a wonky horizon, you can criticise that in the gallery, but if, as the name implies, you are looking for a somebody else's 'consideration' this is the place to go.
User ID wrote:
Typical UHH lack of initiative. Why do you ask Rick ? Why don’t you just look at the public records ? Below is the only subject Rick has posted. Nothing embarrassing:
.
You're right, I missed the one and only picture he posted on UHH since becoming a member in 2014. Good catch.
How about rather than "embarassing them" to the rest of their "admirers" that you ask the person to private message you for your opinion?????
User ID wrote:
Typical UHH lack of initiative. Why do you ask Rick ? Why don’t you just look at the public records ? Below is the only subject Rick has posted. Nothing embarrassing:
.
I like the picture.
What's the matter with only posting one image so far?
Is it a membership requirement to post many pictures?
Is it a race?
He who posts the most pictures wins?
foathog wrote:
How about rather than "embarassing them" to the rest of their "admirers" that you ask the person to private message you for your opinion?????
Best way. Then that they may let you know they aren't interested without any back-and-forth ensuing on the thread.
yssirk123 wrote:
You're right, I missed the one and only picture he posted on UHH since becoming a member in 2014. Good catch.
Does it matter?????
Is there a minimum picture posting requirement?
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.