Mirror vs Mirrorless
Jan 26, 2022 23:31:03 #
User ID wrote:
Thaz reeeeeeally easy. You like an SLR viewfinder. A modern EVF does exactly ... EXACTLY... the same thing, plus more when required.
Yea. I'm not interested in mirrorless either.
My bridge camera has an EVF, so?
Why should I jump on the mirrorless bandwagon? I can't see a reason.
Jan 26, 2022 23:53:15 #
burkphoto wrote:
The same is true of Panasonic Lumix cameras, at least with the electronic shutter. I choose instant review, or just continuous live view.
Correct for micro 4/3rds, but the first FULLFRAME mirrorless camera with no blackout was the Sony A9, released in April 2017.
Cheers
Jan 27, 2022 00:32:47 #
Longshadow wrote:
Yea. I'm not interested in mirrorless either.
My bridge camera has an EVF, so?
Why should I jump on the mirrorless bandwagon? I can't see a reason.
My bridge camera has an EVF, so?
Why should I jump on the mirrorless bandwagon? I can't see a reason.
Repeated references such as “jumping on the bandwagon”, from various sources, are quite telling.
Jan 27, 2022 00:50:01 #
Jan 27, 2022 05:46:22 #
User ID wrote:
Thaz reeeeeeally easy. You like an SLR viewfinder. A modern EVF does exactly ... EXACTLY... the same thing, plus more when required.
Big difference. If you can't see the difference you're blind my friend.
Jan 27, 2022 05:47:09 #
BebuLamar wrote:
The one single down side of mirrorless is the EVF. Period.
For you ok. For me a mirror and a prism in a mountain stuck on the top plate of the camera, and clunk click every trip is not acceptable when there is a better alternative, i.e. EVF.
Jan 27, 2022 06:18:09 #
whfowle
Loc: Tampa first, now Albuquerque
I would add that vibration from the mirror flap is gone. I also like the ability to carry one camera body for video and stills. My dslr's were never very good at video. I think when you get used to a particular way of shooting, it is hard to transition to another because it requires learning some new skills.
Jan 27, 2022 06:18:48 #
I've been shooting mirrorless since 1969. I also shoot mirrored cameras. However, I don't see the draw to mirrorless that seems to have gripped current photographers.
--Bob
--Bob
GeneinChi wrote:
In many of the posts when the discussion is mirror... (show quote)
Jan 27, 2022 06:40:49 #
LLC
Loc: Ontario, Canada
Longshadow wrote:
Why should I jump on the mirrorless bandwagon? I can't see a reason.
Why should I jump on the mirrorless bandwagon? I can't see a reason.
Camera companies made the decision for you...
It looks like your next SLR will come from flea market...
Jan 27, 2022 07:14:46 #
Got a Z9 and the the new Nikon 70-200 this week. Have not taken them out of the boxes yet. Hope to do so in the next few days. Moving up from D5 and D4s. Interesting time.
Jan 27, 2022 07:16:03 #
Jan 27, 2022 07:25:21 #
Delderby wrote:
For you ok. For me a mirror and a prism in a mountain stuck on the top plate of the camera, and clunk click every trip is not acceptable when there is a better alternative, i.e. EVF.
I don't say nothing about whether it's for you. I do believe mirrorless is for a lot of people. Just it's not for me and say it's for everyone is simply not correct.
Jan 27, 2022 07:32:54 #
I find interest in the amount of vitriol that entered this conversation.
--Bob
--Bob
Jan 27, 2022 07:39:20 #
BebuLamar wrote:
I don't say nothing about whether it's for you. I do believe mirrorless is for a lot of people. Just it's not for me and say it's for everyone is simply not correct.
I did not say that you mentioned any one other than yourself. By the same token I have only mentioned myself.
Jan 27, 2022 07:40:21 #
Buzzardluck
Loc: Tempe, AZ
I don't understand mirrorless either; I took the mirror out of my Nikon D7200 and now it doesn't work.
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.