What makes you think this?
This person has been registered for a while and posted a couple of Sony questions immediately. I think you're a bit gun shy thinking that anyone with an interesting photo must have stolen it.
I really don't understand all the worry and what ever else About this person.If you don't like this persons work just don't look at it.
Actually these images are fairly nice, and in no way pornographic.Would I post images like these? No, they are not my style.
Manglesphoto wrote:
I really don't understand all the worry and what ever else About this person.If you don't like this persons work just don't look at it.
Actually these images are fairly nice, and in no way pornographic.Would I post images like these? No, they are not my style.
I somewhat understand not wanting to get taken in by someone passing off work that isn't theirs, but then again, I'm the one that has often stated it would be my preference that only those that had work to offer up for this section could participate here. That's obviously never going to happen.
It's beneficial on a photography forum to be able to ask a contributor questions about their submissions. That's completely negated if you're not talking to the actual photographer.
In one of the images in question there is a patch of red tinting that might happen if you took a color photo of a black and white image. When asked about the tinting the response didn't appear to make sense from an artistic standpoint. Maybe that is what prompted this thread.
JohnFrim
Loc: Somewhere in the Great White North.
I tried looking them up from a screen capture, but no luck.
But it was funny that the first reference image of the two ladies showed up as "plumbing."
Second image is from the Deviant Art site.
InfiniteISO wrote:
I somewhat understand not wanting to get taken in by someone passing off work that isn't theirs, but then again, I'm the one that has often stated it would be my preference that only those that had work to offer up for this section could participate here. That's obviously never going to happen.
It's beneficial on a photography forum to be able to ask a contributor questions about their submissions. That's completely negated if you're not talking to the actual photographer.
In one of the images in question there is a patch of red tinting that might happen if you took a color photo of a black and white image. When asked about the tinting the response didn't appear to make sense from an artistic standpoint. Maybe that is what prompted this thread.
I somewhat understand not wanting to get taken in ... (
show quote)
Now I understand, Thank you
I must have missed something in previous postings
I feel for the owner of the images, have been in that boat when in the OLD AOL chat room for photographers, the asshole posted one of my images as his!!! then got PO'ed when I called him out on it.
I thought the same thing when I saw the post……but decided to just shut up.
Perhaps look at:
https://www.uglyhedgehog.com/t-725612-2.htmlOne of the models sited as Gemma is in fact Kerri Taylor, Karri has been doing figure modeling a vary long time. The other model resembles Violet Storm and she is on porn sites. Like being on porn sites makes any difference. It is 2022, time to get over the whole porn site issue. Move on. As a note, Karri does some pretty silly films as did Bettie Page in her day, pays the rent as they say.
Some models do porn. The one constant is that models who do porn are as lacking in creativity as the people who make porn films. Thing is, after doing some porn one finds that the model's abilities do improve, but not by much. But decent models are more than pretty faces, the generally have brains to go with their looks, some are even creative, and that is really he difference.
To be clear, models with brains and have creativity (like Mosh, Liz Ashley, London Andrews) aren't into doing porn for the same reason that most of us boys aren't much into porn, it is just plain boring (doing or watching it).
to be clear! these are my photos! Gemma is a nickname -
InfiniteISO wrote:
What makes you think this?
This person has been registered for a while and posted a couple of Sony questions immediately. I think you're a bit gun shy thinking that anyone with an interesting photo must have stolen it.
to be clear! these are my photos! Gemma is a nickname -
InfiniteISO wrote:
I somewhat understand not wanting to get taken in by someone passing off work that isn't theirs, but then again, I'm the one that has often stated it would be my preference that only those that had work to offer up for this section could participate here. That's obviously never going to happen.
It's beneficial on a photography forum to be able to ask a contributor questions about their submissions. That's completely negated if you're not talking to the actual photographer.
In one of the images in question there is a patch of red tinting that might happen if you took a color photo of a black and white image. When asked about the tinting the response didn't appear to make sense from an artistic standpoint. Maybe that is what prompted this thread.
I somewhat understand not wanting to get taken in ... (
show quote)
to be clear! these are my photos! Gemma is a nickname -
Manglesphoto wrote:
Now I understand, Thank you
I must have missed something in previous postings
I feel for the owner of the images, have been in that boat when in the OLD AOL chat room for photographers, the asshole posted one of my images as his!!! then got PO'ed when I called him out on it.
to be clear! these are my photos! Gemma is a nickname -
InfiniteISO wrote:
I somewhat understand not wanting to get taken in by someone passing off work that isn't theirs, but then again, I'm the one that has often stated it would be my preference that only those that had work to offer up for this section could participate here. That's obviously never going to happen.
It's beneficial on a photography forum to be able to ask a contributor questions about their submissions. That's completely negated if you're not talking to the actual photographer.
In one of the images in question there is a patch of red tinting that might happen if you took a color photo of a black and white image. When asked about the tinting the response didn't appear to make sense from an artistic standpoint. Maybe that is what prompted this thread.
I somewhat understand not wanting to get taken in ... (
show quote)
to be clear! these are my photos! Gemma is a nickname - and both models are friends of mine -
to be clear! these are my photos! Gemma is a nickname -
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.