Not in my main section.
Check what you have selected to view.
added to upper right and lower left a small red tint to change it up a bit . .
Jwshelton wrote:
Not in my main section.
Check what you have selected to view.
You should really respond by selecting "quote reply" so we can see to whom you are responding.
If you are responding to my comment I can assure you that this thread was originally posted to the Main Discussion forum. And as I predicted " this will be moved quickly".
The Administrator will just about always move images from Main Discussion to a more appropriate forum as soon as he sees them or if someone reports it.
This particular post, containing nudity, was an easy call.
Hi, good phototechnics. The grey scale is excellent, at least on my iPhone. One thing, though, about the pose. It’s maybe a bit too vertical. I might have moved the top model somewhere else just to mix up the composition. As is, it almost appears to be a duplicate image, like there’s two of the same pose if you know what I mean. If that’s how you wanted it, then I say good on you. It’s still a cool image. It’s always fun shooting two nude models together.
Okay, I just went back and looked at it again, and their poses are nearly identical. One of them should have been doing something else. Only my opinion.
Perhaps you look at the title for this section !
WirtzWorld wrote:
Hi, good phototechnics. The grey scale is excellent, at least on my iPhone. One thing, though, about the pose. It’s maybe a bit too vertical. I might have moved the top model somewhere else just to mix up the composition. As is, it almost appears to be a duplicate image, like there’s two of the same pose if you know what I mean. If that’s how you wanted it, then I say good on you. It’s still a cool image. It’s always fun shooting two nude models together.
Okay, I just went back and looked at it again, and their poses are nearly identical. One of them should have been doing something else. Only my opinion.
Hi, good phototechnics. The grey scale is excelle... (
show quote)
makes sense . . next time . . thanks
For some reason, when I look at this, it looks like the model in front is posing in front of a poster. The model in back looks just a little bit larger.
Very interesting in any case!
mullicabill wrote:
So just a nice set with soapy water, hay bales and two friends . .
I don't quite get this, you give billing to one model Gemma, and no note to the other model Kerri Taylor? Kerri ( Kerri Taylor, Gianna Angelo) a vary well known model and one hopes that she should be known for her modeling and acting.
Not My Photo of her, though I know her and that buddy of hers Violet Storm (Michelle Trasatti), find one you find the other.
Kerri Taylor
Can't help wondering if we have another Laylafan here. Let's see how this pans out.
DanielB wrote:
Can't help wondering if we have another Laylafan here. Let's see how this pans out.
Ok, let me throw some fuel on this fire and put the match to it. Now I don't really care, but this does get quite disinteresting to posting ideas and content to a photography site, or as VADA would say "So pathetic!"
I will add that the other woman shown in the water/wash image as "Gemma and friend" appears to be similar to Violet Storm (Michelle Trasatti). I add this because they were indeed buddies, being Jersey Girls.
Constructed image, perhaps. Pathetic, for sure.
And as Sargent Rock often is quoted "Nuff Said!".
Re Post of the image marked "Gemma".
From the internet, Kerri Taylor (Gianna Angelo), I have rotated the image to make it more viewable.
(
Download)
Re post of "Gemma and Friend".
Violet Storm (Michelle Trasatti) Also from the internet, and yes, Violet does porn under that name.
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.