Since the U.S. Navy has released official videos of triangular shaped UFO's, I thought that I should re-release the image that was seriously ridiculed by many UHH members. I found this on the NASA lunar orbiting camera website: (quickmap.lroc.asu.edu). It shows two triangular craft parked on the northern edge of the crater "Hershel". You will see that there are areas of change in the libido of the lunar surface caused by the arrival of the craft. These disturbances appear to be caused by breaking of the decent by vertical thrusting devices. This image can be seen on the quickmap site by entering the lat/lon coordinates shown on the lower,left corner of the image. The distance scale of this image is seen on the lower right. Have fun on quickmap. You will never again use a telescope on the Moon.
Albedo, unless there other unexpected things about the Moon.
You are in for more ridicule.
kpmac wrote:
You are in for more ridicule.
Let er rip. Those two craft are about 200-300 feet long and probably nuclear powered anti gravity machines that would prove Nicolai Tesla was correct. Most importantly they are there and made in the U.S.A. Tesla was missing one thing: The power source. The Nazis had demonstrated a bell shaped device that was an anti gravity machine. It was suspended in a framework and received electric power from an external source. It did however become weightless.
If you are talking about those 2 triangles at left , i think they are a shadow caused by low sun light and 2 pointed hills nearby ?????
sb
Loc: Florida's East Coast
I don't see triangular craft. Where are they? What is "north", and which crater is Hershel?
Quixdraw wrote:
Albedo, unless there other unexpected things about the Moon.
Thanks. I thought, libido, was a bit too racy for the moon.
Dennis
Your eyes (and imagination) are better than mine.
Chuck
Both shadows as is the one top center. Unless that one crashed. Oh, and I'll continue using my telescope.
Yes, I have an overload of imagination. It came in quite handy when i spent two years on a NASA project called Surveyor and another called Apollo which was a year of installation and debugging the Apollo Mission Simulator at the Mission Control Center Houston.
How many of you have used the Quickmap Site? Were you unable to see the two craft that were painted black parked on the same heading and the disturbance of the lunar surface that they caused? You are all pretty much a closed minded group.
Streets wrote:
Yes, I have an overload of imagination. It came in quite handy when i spent two years on a NASA project called Surveyor and another called Apollo which was a year of installation and debugging the Apollo Mission Simulator at the Mission Control Center Houston.
How many of you have used the Quickmap Site? Were you unable to see the two craft that were painted black parked on the same heading and the disturbance of the lunar surface that they caused? You are all pretty much a closed minded group.
Yes, I have an overload of imagination. It came i... (
show quote)
WOW!!!! I took that as insulting. You say we are closed minded because we do not see something you see and from your background, understand while we do not. Personally I think I saw your triangles and certainly understand what you are trying to get across. What is it we are not getting?
Dennis
dennis2146 wrote:
WOW!!!! I took that as insulting. You say we are closed minded because we do not see something you see and from your background, understand while we do not. Personally I think I saw your triangles and certainly understand what you are trying to get across. What is it we are not getting?
Dennis
It appears "the truth". My working life dealt with solving problems that others avoided and that I had never seen or heard of before. My last job was with American Airlines as lead engineer in the Flight Simulation Support Group at the Flight Academy in Ft. Worth TX. I applied this aptitude in dealing with what I saw in the Image on the "Quickmap" site. The spacecraft, by the way, were not the only anomalies I found on that site.
Streets wrote:
It appears "the truth". My working life dealt with solving problems that others avoided and that I had never seen or heard of before. My last job was with American Airlines as lead engineer in the Flight Simulation Support Group at the Flight Academy in Ft. Worth TX. I applied this aptitude in dealing with what I saw in the Image on the "Quickmap" site. The spacecraft, by the way, were not the only anomalies I found on that site.
Have you considered that my working life and that of millions of others has problems YOU may never have come up against but they handle their problems associated with their jobs every day whereas you might just be dumfounded. I don't mean that as an insult but simply, "The Truth", also. Difference is you seem to be bothered not all of us have the exact understanding you have. Most likely very few people do. But in the case of your photo it is not all that hard to figure out. I saw the triangles and got your point. That does not make me a rocket scientist nor does it mean I am accepting/deserving of insults because I am not. Nor is anyone else on this forum.
Have a wonderful day,
Dennis
I don't see anything but shadows even in the download…which is not the same as saying that there is no such things as a UFO…or as they're called in the current parlance UAP for unidentified aerial phenomenon. Yes…a lot of the sightings can be easily explained away but there have been a considerable number that were observed by trained military folk who are familiar with the way aircraft can move and some of those have also been observed on radar. Given that…just pooh poohing the entire concept seems a bit premature.
And considering both the size of the known universe and the religious beliefs one might…or might not…hold. If the universe evolved naturally without the influence of a supreme being…then in the 100 billion to 200 billion estimate for the number of galaxies and the average 100 million stars per galaxy that's 10 to the 19th stars or about 20,000 trillion. Add in the average lifetime of a star vs the age of the universe and that number goes even higher than that. If evolution…and only evolution…is responsible for life on earth…is it reasonable to assume that the correct conditions for either earth like life…or some other kind of life…only ever existed in 1 out of 20,000 trillion star systems? Certainly not. OTOH…if God or Allah or Buddha or your_choice_of_being_name_here is responsible and he/she/it created mankind…and also created an entire universe that's about 92 billion light years across for the known universe…and knowing that even if warp drive was developed then galaxies even only 1 billion light years away are simply out of reach for mankind…then why would he/she/it bother creating the rest of the universe. Again…doesn't make sense.
So…it seems pretty obvious statistically that life developed in other star systems in our own or other galaxies…and that entire civilizations could have arisen, developed, and been wiped out when their star went supernova and we would have zero idea it ever happened. It also seems pretty statistically correct that at least some of these civilizations developed space travel, FTL travel, and such might be visiting us now or have visited us in the past…and it's not unreasonable that an intelligent space fairing civilization might have something like the Prime Directive from Star Trek (don't interfere with developing worlds until if/when they develop warp drive).
Me…I've got no proof that little green men (or women or lizards or whatever) actually exist…but then there's no real proof they don't either…and since we all know that any sufficiently advanced technology will be perceived as magic by less advanced people it's not unreasonable that they've been visiting us for a long time with their cloaking device enabled…and it's not unreasonable that sometimes the device might not work quite properly or fail completely.
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.