Rose42 wrote:
There are a lot of flakes on twitter who post stupid things. Twitter is inconsistent with the banning
Not all stupid speech is dangerous. I don't believe twitter has a rule against stupid speech. They apparently don't want involved in spreading dangerous speech.
Racmanaz wrote:
"Thinking is difficult, that's why most 'Lefties' judge."
"Thinking is difficult"
For you, probably, but not for most of us.
Bazbo
Loc: Lisboa, Portugal
Steven Seward wrote:
I read the article carefully before responding, unlike most of the liberals who just read the headlines. I invite you to specifically point out where I am wrong. Warning - You will have to read the article yourself.
YOU made the assertion that the article vindicated your opinion that MTG never said the things she said. The burden of proof is not mine--its yours. Show us specific examples of how the article backs up your opinion.
As far as I am concerned, the article is well-sourced and stands of its own merits. And it obviously does not not do what you said it dues. In fact, it does just the opposite. Black is not white and up is not down, no matter how much you desire it to be true.
Read the article before you respond.
Racmanaz wrote:
Maybe the article is loaded with BS.
Everything is accordiñg to you rac
Bazbo
Loc: Lisboa, Portugal
Racmanaz wrote:
Where was the insult??
Well let's start with the fact that you call everyone who disagrees with you a liar. Not only is this an insult, bit it only proves that you are in desperate need of a dictionary.
Bazbo wrote:
YOU made the assertion that the article vindicated your opinion that MTG never said the things she said. The burden of proof is not mine--its yours. Show us specific examples of how the article backs up your opinion.
As far as I am concerned, the article is well-sourced and stands of its own merits. And it obviously does not not do what you said it dues. In fact, it does just the opposite. Black is not white and up is not down, no matter how much you desire it to be true.
Read the article before you respond.
YOU made the assertion that the article vindicated... (
show quote)
The Newsweek fact check backs up my opinion by never giving evidence of the gross lies from the article that Tex posted - for instance that Greene supports the executions of Pelosi, Obama, and Hillary. You have also proven my point that liberals often don't read past the headlines of an article. If you did, you would be trying to point out where I was specifically wrong. Instead, your generic rebuttal is "the article is well-sourced and stands on its own merits." As if you actually checked out and verified its sources!
Bazbo
Loc: Lisboa, Portugal
Steven Seward wrote:
The Newsweek fact check backs up my opinion by never giving evidence of the gross lies from the article that Tex posted - for instance that Greene supports the executions of Pelosi, Obama, and Hillary. You have also proven my point that liberals often don't read past the headlines of an article. If you did, you would be trying to point out where I was specifically wrong. Instead, your generic rebuttal is "the article is well-sourced and stands on its own merits." As if you actually checked out and verified its sources!
The Newsweek fact check backs up my opinion by nev... (
show quote)
My issue with you is that you said that the article backs you up when in fact it dies the opposite. I am indifferent to what you think about the article.
I did not prove any point you were trying to make at all. In fact go to the end of the article to the conclusion and then come back and try to to convince anyone outside of Trump Town that the article backs you up. You are the one who has not read the article or if you have, you need a reading tutor STAT.
I see a pattern here: You make false claims about extant evidence and think that your bluster and snide can carry the day.
It won't.
thom w wrote:
Not all stupid speech is dangerous. I don't believe twitter has a rule against stupid speech. They apparently don't want involved in spreading dangerous speech.
Whats considered dangerous is most often subjective or self serving.
Bazbo wrote:
Well let's start with the fact that you call everyone who disagrees with you a liar. Not only is this an insult, bit it only proves that you are in desperate need of a dictionary.
Lol deflection, You implied that I insulted you. That was a lie. You're also lying claiming that I call everybody a liar that disagrees with me, that's not true. I call the ones that lie liars.
Racmanaz wrote:
Lol deflection, You implied that I insulted you. That was a lie. You're also lying claiming that I call everybody a liar that disagrees with me, that's not true. I call the ones that lie liars.
Calling someone a liar insult in it self
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.