Ballangrud wrote:
The photo marked number 1 is why we have the electoral college, it is intended to keep the highly concentrated centers of population from having too much say in how the other states are governed at the federal level.
No. We have an electoral college, because the founders believed, due to the lack of mass communication (and the very idea of such a thing inconceivable to them), the common people would be unable to know, and therefore unable to select, a national candidate.
As original spelled out in the Constitution, the average person would merely vote for
- his local representative to the state legislature,
- his local representative to the US House of Representatives,
- and perhaps the mayor and other leaders of his town.
In no case would he need to vote for someone he couldn't meet personally --- because, back then, that was the only way to know if you wanted to vote for someone. Remember, we didn't even have railroads yet --- information traveled by horse & buggy.
Then the state legislature would pick the Senators and the electoral -- again from people that they could know personally. And then the electors could familiarize themselves with the presidential candidates, and make their choice.
The founders had little concern about population centers vs rural areas. The country was agrarian with most people living on farms with just a few cities by sea ports-- with the only change that they foresaw was the population evening out as we moved west.
We should have done away with the electoral college and moved to direct election of the president back when we passed the 17th Amendment which allowed for direct election of senators.
Of course, changing it now would require a rather entitled minority to vote to give up the disproportionate power they have, so that will never happen.