jdventer wrote:
I'm just passing along the best advice I'm aware of. People seem to take things very personally.
Especially on the Internet when there are no vocal inflections, no hand gestures, no body language. Even if one is an expert in something (see the posts by the community college teacher), written words allow everyone to come off as experts even when they are not, so when the real expert comes aboard, s/he gets castigated as a know it all. That's why it behooves one to chose those words carefully, and which is why I was questioning you on "generally agreed" and such.
big-guy
Loc: Peterborough Ontario Canada
Markgag wrote:
Does Lightroom allow you to do batch processing of the metadata? For example, I have several hundred photos from my honeymoon in Hawaii. I don't want to have to type in 1984, Hawaii, O'ahu, Honeymoon, spouse name, etc on several hundred photos. Can I select them all and apply these keywords to all of them at once and then individually add specific keywords (i.e. sunset, catamaran, waterfall, etc.)?
Yes, it can and does very well. A huge example is to import (add to the catalogue, not duplicate photos) all your gazillion photos. Then go to the smart collections and choose all photos without keywords. Sort by date. Click the first in a series of X event, shift click the last photo in the event. In the keyword panel type the general keywords for that event seperated by a comma. (red, car, ford, rusty, broken, junk etc.) when you hit enter those photos will have those keywords assigned to them and be removed from the smart collection. Very cool and as quick as possible.
When finished you can search by keyword such as Hawaii and then add more proprietary keywords via typing or...It also gives you a painter tool that paints all sorts of things including keywords in the photos. So you do your batch keywording then go back and find a sunset. Grab the painter tool type sunset in the paint bucket (my term) and then scroll and click on all the sunsets. No typing just a quick click.
In case you haven't figured it out, I am a strong advocate of LR. This is after almost 15 years of using all sorts of methods all described here in this thread, and many that weren't, plus many of the latest and greatest of programs for handling my photos. They did some wonderful things but they all lacked something and now I wouldn't go back to any of them with the exception of quick viewing an emailed photo or similar which I use an old copy of ACDSee or good ole Windoze.
Use LR and your keywords, they are a Godsend.
Everyone probably knew this (except me), but Lightroom 4 and later will not work with Windows XP. I read a lot about Lightroom after seeing the comments here and really liked it so I ordered it from Adorama. It came today and during the installation process a message box come up to tell you that you must have Vista or later and the installation stopped. My computer is too old to upgrade and I just don't have the budget right now to replace it. I mention this just hoping nobody else gets caught like I did.
big-guy
Loc: Peterborough Ontario Canada
PixelBill wrote:
Everyone probably knew this (except me), but Lightroom 4 and later will not work with Windows XP. I read a lot about Lightroom after seeing the comments here and really liked it so I ordered it from Adorama. It came today and during the installation process a message box come up to tell you that you must have Vista or later and the installation stopped. My computer is too old to upgrade and I just don't have the budget right now to replace it. I mention this just hoping nobody else gets caught like I did.
Everyone probably knew this (except me), but Light... (
show quote)
Two points of interest. (IMHO)
1. I recommend purchasing direct from Adobe, you get the latest version and don't pay any possible middle man fees.
2. Sad to say with XP you are stuck using version 3 however, that is a fine version which I am very happy with. When the time comes to update my OS I will also update LR to get those great looking adaptations I see and hear about.
saichiez wrote:
seeker wrote:
In addition to saving my photos in files on my laptop, I also download everything onto dvd's. You can use cd's as well. Most are labeled according to the month and year they were taken as well as subject matter. I also sort miscellaneous photos into categories such as animals, flowers, hockey games, etc. Once they are labeled I slip them into zippered cd holders. I can always locate my photos easily using this system, and if my computer dies I don't panic that I've lost years of favorite photos.
In addition to saving my photos in files on my lap... (
show quote)
OH.. WOW... I don't want to throw a "monkey wrench" in your program....
OH Hell!!! Yes I do...
Have you done any searches on Yahoo or Google for the terms:
CD Rot
DVD Rot.
Optical disk as an archiving tool is now anathema to any form or permanence.
Optical disks are deteriorating as I post this information. I teach computer classes at the Community College level. I am now teaching that Optical Disks are the most risky method one can use to back up or archive data files.
Please take me seriously on this matter. Your CD/DVD's may be becoming unreadable as you read this.
quote=seeker In addition to saving my photos in f... (
show quote)
CD and DVD Rot are caused by improper storage nothing more.
Properly stored the medium will outlast the drives to read them.
Brian in Whitby wrote:
saichiez wrote:
seeker wrote:
In addition to saving my photos in files on my laptop, I also download everything onto dvd's. You can use cd's as well. Most are labeled according to the month and year they were taken as well as subject matter. I also sort miscellaneous photos into categories such as animals, flowers, hockey games, etc. Once they are labeled I slip them into zippered cd holders. I can always locate my photos easily using this system, and if my computer dies I don't panic that I've lost years of favorite photos.
In addition to saving my photos in files on my lap... (
show quote)
OH.. WOW... I don't want to throw a "monkey wrench" in your program....
OH Hell!!! Yes I do...
Have you done any searches on Yahoo or Google for the terms:
CD Rot
DVD Rot.
Optical disk as an archiving tool is now anathema to any form or permanence.
Optical disks are deteriorating as I post this information. I teach computer classes at the Community College level. I am now teaching that Optical Disks are the most risky method one can use to back up or archive data files.
Please take me seriously on this matter. Your CD/DVD's may be becoming unreadable as you read this.
quote=seeker In addition to saving my photos in f... (
show quote)
CD and DVD Rot are caused by improper storage nothing more.
Properly stored the medium will outlast the drives to read them.
quote=saichiez quote=seeker In addition to savin... (
show quote)
Can you supply a link that describes this problem with Disc Rot & preservation with improper/proper storage?
Just now I viewed photos that were downloaded to discs in 1998-
2006. All were absolutely fine. Don't know how long they will avoid rot but are ok at this point. More recently I have stored photos on flash drive but as with all technology I imagine there can be problems with that form of storage as well.
Brian in Whitby wrote:
saichiez wrote:
seeker wrote:
In addition to saving my photos in files on my laptop, I also download everything onto dvd's. You can use cd's as well. Most are labeled according to the month and year they were taken as well as subject matter. I also sort miscellaneous photos into categories such as animals, flowers, hockey games, etc. Once they are labeled I slip them into zippered cd holders. I can always locate my photos easily using this system, and if my computer dies I don't panic that I've lost years of favorite photos.
In addition to saving my photos in files on my lap... (
show quote)
OH.. WOW... I don't want to throw a "monkey wrench" in your program....
OH Hell!!! Yes I do...
Have you done any searches on Yahoo or Google for the terms:
CD Rot
DVD Rot.
Optical disk as an archiving tool is now anathema to any form or permanence.
Optical disks are deteriorating as I post this information. I teach computer classes at the Community College level. I am now teaching that Optical Disks are the most risky method one can use to back up or archive data files.
Please take me seriously on this matter. Your CD/DVD's may be becoming unreadable as you read this.
quote=seeker In addition to saving my photos in f... (
show quote)
CD and DVD Rot are caused by improper storage nothing more.
Properly stored the medium will outlast the drives to read them.
quote=saichiez quote=seeker In addition to savin... (
show quote)
Well this convinces me that I need to go back to paper tapes and punched cards.
:D
Larry
Gosh, are we back on this AGAIN ????
Briggs wrote:
I have so many pictures and I need to start organizing. I need to purchase a program to do this but I don't want to buy one and then not like it. Any suggestions would be so appreciated.
Here are 10 of the 2013 best photo organizing software comparison and reviews:
http://photo-organizing-software-review.toptenreviews.com/
I do what you do, but on a Mac. Then I import my photos into lightroom and I tag them so they are easier to find. For organizing I like Lightroom much better than the organizer in elements.
EstherP wrote:
What makes you think you "need to purchase" a program?
By using a program, you are always using someone else's ideas of how organization should happen. This may or may not suit your needs.
As to possibly not liking a program after you buy it, that's a risk we all take.
To begin with though, I would like to suggest you start using the Windows Explorer (no idea what the Mac version is called, but I'm sure they have somthing similar). Make a folder: Photos.
Subfolder for each year. Within each year, subfolders for each month.
Within each month, subfolders for events.
So that a picture of Johnny's birthday could be found at:
Photos -> 2012 -> May -> Johnny birthday
or your vacation:
Photos -> 2009 -> July -> Banff, Rocky Mountains
If you find that doesn't suit you, you can still buy software. But either way, you have to put the pictures where you want them to be.
I have been using this method ever since I've been taking digital images, and have not yet had a problem finding a picture back when I need it.
EstherP
What makes you think you "need to purchase&qu... (
show quote)
Go buy the latest version of Lightroom software. It's an Adobe program and it's not very expensive. Lightroom can do more than you can imagine and organizing and storing your photos is one of the best features that it offers.
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.