Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
Lightroom 6 Image Weight After Export
Page <<first <prev 3 of 4 next>
Dec 24, 2021 16:50:41   #
JD750 Loc: SoCal
 
Longshadow wrote:
Something for the bored shitless to do.

Data itself has no weight. What represents it in different media may.




But data has 0 value, it ceases to exist, if it is not stored in a retrievable manner.

Reply
Dec 24, 2021 16:52:13   #
Longshadow Loc: Audubon, PA, United States
 
JD750 wrote:


But data has 0 value, it ceases to exist, if it is not stored in a retrievable manner.

Does that mean we can only store 1s?
How is null stored?

Reply
Dec 24, 2021 17:30:40   #
Old Coot
 
CHG_CANON wrote:
You can fill your trunk with gigabytes and you'll still never know the difference ....


Well you can if they are on a hard drive

Reply
 
 
Dec 24, 2021 17:54:13   #
JD750 Loc: SoCal
 
Longshadow wrote:
Does that mean we can only store 1s?
How is null stored?


Only 1's. What? You want to store 0's too? How many? LOL.

The two states of the typical flash memory cell are charged and uncharged.

Reply
Dec 24, 2021 18:17:36   #
Longshadow Loc: Audubon, PA, United States
 
JD750 wrote:
Only 1's. What? You want to store 0's too? How many? LOL.

The two states of the typical flash memory cell are charged and uncharged.


Certainly. How many depends on the data.
When a cell that contained a 1 could be overwritten with a 0.

But your statement But data has 0 value, it ceases to exist,... confused me.
What ceases to exist? The data? A 0 ceases to exist?

Reply
Dec 24, 2021 22:39:54   #
JD750 Loc: SoCal
 
Longshadow wrote:
Certainly. How many depends on the data.
When a cell that contained a 1 could be overwritten with a 0.

But your statement But data has 0 value, it ceases to exist,... confused me.
What ceases to exist? The data? A 0 ceases to exist?


I'm sorry I worded that oddly. What I meant was, in general terms, if data is not stored, then it ceases to exist, and when it ceases to exist it has 0 value.

Reply
Dec 24, 2021 22:44:53   #
Longshadow Loc: Audubon, PA, United States
 
JD750 wrote:
I'm sorry I worded that oddly. What I meant was, in general terms, if data is not stored, then it ceases to exist, and when it ceases to exist it has 0 value.

Last I knew, there was data, 0s and 1s, and null was no data where 0s and 1s are indeterminate or irrelevant.
How do you know null is 0s? It could be 1s. Depends on the logic system. Positive Logic is active-high and Negative Logic is active-low.

Reply
 
 
Dec 24, 2021 23:26:42   #
CHG_CANON Loc: the Windy City
 
Which weights more, a 4GB HD freshly formatted from the packaging? Or, that same 4GB HD with all my TIFF, RAW and the LRCAT files filled to 3.66GB?

Reply
Dec 25, 2021 00:50:33   #
JD750 Loc: SoCal
 
CHG_CANON wrote:
Which weights more, a 4GB HD freshly formatted from the packaging? Or, that same 4GB HD with all my TIFF, RAW and the LRCAT files filled to 3.66GB?


The full one but the difference is not measurable.

My point was the mass of the storage element should be considered because without that there is no data.

Have a Merry Christmas.

Reply
Dec 25, 2021 09:14:38   #
Longshadow Loc: Audubon, PA, United States
 
JD750 wrote:
The full one but the difference is not measurable.

My point was the mass of the storage element should be considered because without that there is no data.

Have a Merry Christmas.

HD or SSD?

Then data has electricity also, for without it, there would be no data.

Merry Christmas to you also!

Reply
Dec 25, 2021 09:25:51   #
BebuLamar
 
If you are talking about JPEG file size then the file size depends a lot of the complexity of the image. Merging images create an image with more complexity than one single image in the group used to merge.

Reply
 
 
Dec 27, 2021 19:47:52   #
Brucer Loc: Bedminster, NJ
 
CHG_CANON wrote:
Brucer, it seems that all my comments about dots are not reaching you. There are no dots in pixel-based images. DPI -- as in dots per inch -- are as relevant to pixel-based images as the appendix is to the human, a forgotten holdover from another time and age. Keep in mind we're not there to look over your shoulder, rather we must work through you for the relevant details.

An image around 8000 x 5500 is a 46MP image, so we're thinking you have an EOS R5 or similar camera. When I search the EOS R5 manual, it seems the expected file size is 45MB. Maybe you have a Sony and you're looking / comparing the Sony compressed RAW file sizes, something that may change in the comparison when looking at the JPEG? Also, different cameras produce different bit-depth image files, that will impact the byte-size of the resulting files.

So, a bit more details about what you're talking about, at the specific technical details, will assist / accomplish a more enlightened review of the technical issues and your original questions and observations.
Brucer, it seems that all my comments about dots a... (show quote)


Sorry if my lack of technical knowledge disappoints. I wish I had more time to learn some of what is clearly second nature to you.

As I think I wrote a couple of times in this thread, I'm using a Nikon D850. Unfortunately, I felt a couple of days ago that I just don't have the knowledge to communicate to you the problem, but I came back chiefly to thank you.

Yes, the 45.7 megapixel camera often produces larger than 45 MB RAW files. And why a 60 MB RAW file gets transformed into a 30 MB file through Lightroom's Develop function and/or Export as a jpg, beats me. I can almost swear that was not the case, before my Lightroom 6 somehow began behaving badly.

Reply
Dec 27, 2021 20:06:53   #
Longshadow Loc: Audubon, PA, United States
 
45.7 Mp camera, the total amount of pixels in the sensor.
The file will not be 45.7 Mb.
Apples and kumquats. Pixels<>bits(bytes).

The file size for a 45Mp image will usually be larger because there is much overhead information in the file in addition to just the image data.

JPEGs created are smaller in bytes because the data is compressed, depending on the amount of compression selected during the save ("quality" level).

Reply
Dec 27, 2021 20:13:30   #
Brucer Loc: Bedminster, NJ
 
JD750 wrote:
Well a byte is digital data and as such it must occupy a physical location. That location is not 0 mass. Be that a hard drive or computer memory, there is a physical location where that byte is stored. On computer memory is silicon, it has mass, on spinning rust it is the platter and IronOxide, which also has mass. HD's are TB sized now but a few years ago they were GB and before that MB sized. A GB would be a lot of those! So a GB of data definitely has mass, i.e., weight.


Thanks, BTW. That was obvious to me from the outset. I simply began calling MB and GB and TB "weight" years ago, just by understanding that electrical connections have mass. (E=MC squared. Energy is matter or vice versa.)

Reply
Dec 27, 2021 20:15:42   #
JD750 Loc: SoCal
 
Brucer wrote:
why a 60 MB RAW file gets transformed into a 30 MB file through Lightroom's Develop function and/or Export as a jpg, beats me. I can almost swear that was not the case, before my Lightroom 6 somehow began behaving badly.


JPEGS are compressed files. A 60MB raw file, which was cropped, and then exported as a JPEG, could end up asa 30 MB jpeg file.

Reply
Page <<first <prev 3 of 4 next>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.