You probably don't see anything perverse about claiming vindication from a site that has a long record of hyped stories, shoddy reporting and failure to correct errors.
Texcaster wrote:
You probably don't see anything perverse about claiming vindication from a site that has a long record of hyped stories, shoddy reporting and failure to correct errors.
The study didn't originate from the Washington Times. Wouldn't matter, WT is more credible than any Lefty publication.
Racmanaz wrote:
The study didn't originate from the Washington Times. Wouldn't matter, WT is more credible than any Lefty publication.
Well, you carry on like the WT is going to save your worthless pee tape hide on this one. Why would you bother?
Texcaster wrote:
Well, you carry on like the WT is going to save your worthless hide on this one. Why would you bother?
Lol love the denial and deflection. The article and study must have been about you, you fit the bill perfectly.
Racmanaz wrote:
Lol love the denial and deflection. The article and study must have been about you, you fit the bill perfectly.
Whoop it up Ratz. Is this what winning looks like to you? You're a depressed sad man with no dates again?
nathanweddings wrote:
This is so interesting I suggest you start your own site and leave this one to photography.
Why don’t you learn about UHH and not criticize people for posting in the Attic. This isn’t for photography matters.
National Park wrote:
The second photo should be of the 1/6 insurrectionists and should be titled "brainwashed Republican (Trumpian) slaves."
Wrong again, Bucko. You dims are sure low information voters.
Texcaster wrote:
Home made pee tapes? eeuhh! Bronzer? Platinum blonde wig? Red tie? TicTacs? Slippery shoes? Waaay Trumpie!!
Is that what you wear when you go out on the town in your Nazi police state you live in? How many of your citizens been arrested to date for daring to speak freely about the situation in that cesspool of Naziism you call a country?
National Park wrote:
The second photo should be of the 1/6 insurrectionists and should be titled "brainwashed Republican (Trumpian) slaves."
After flapping your lips on another thread about all the wonderful things Shitty Pants Biden has done, why didn’t you list all of those salient points like you were asked to do? You can’t defend him because he has done nothing right.
Texcaster wrote:
Slavery was the founding sin and founder's template for American capitalism.
"the founding sin"????????????
Don't know where you learned economics, but slavery has never been a "template" for successful capitalism, anywhere, any time. No economic system can flourish with a percentage of its citizens being in slavery, whether as chattel property or indentured servitude.
You also ignore the fact that slavery was also dying out, as technology was beginning to overtake manual labor for farming. The 1861-1865 War actually slowed technology changes in favor of armaments development.
And just where is you damnation of Brazil? They allowed slavery well after it was banned in the U.S. And how about modern slavery in Africa and Islamic countries?
soba1
Loc: Somewhere In So Ca
pendennis wrote:
"the founding sin"????????????
Don't know where you learned economics, but slavery has never been a "template" for successful capitalism, anywhere, any time. No economic system can flourish with a percentage of its citizens being in slavery, whether as chattel property or indentured servitude.
You also ignore the fact that slavery was also dying out, as technology was beginning to overtake manual labor for farming. The 1861-1865 War actually slowed technology changes in favor of armaments development.
And just where is you damnation of Brazil? They allowed slavery well after it was banned in the U.S. And how about modern slavery in Africa and Islamic countries?
"the founding sin"???????????? br br Do... (
show quote)
Good point, and I didnt know that about Brazil
Texcaster wrote:
Slavery was the founding sin and founder's template for American capitalism.
Does that mean that Slavery was also the founding sin and founder's template for Australian Capitalism, too?
According to Wikipedia, Slavery was prevalent in Australia from the beginning of colonization and even up to the present day, using British criminals, Chinese and Indian Coolies, Aborigines, Melanesians, and other South sea Islanders in various forms of Slavery. It is pretty eye-opening. I quote from Wikipedia about modern Slavery in Australia:
"According to the Global Slavery Index, there were approximately 15,000 people living in illegal "conditions of modern slavery" in Australia in 2016. During the 2015–16 financial year, 169 alleged human trafficking and slavery offences were referred to the Australian Federal Police (AFP), including alleged instances of forced marriage, sexual exploitation, and forced labour. As of 2017, the Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions had prosecuted 19 individuals for slavery-related offences since 2004, with several other prosecutions ongoing."
It sounds like you guys never gave up the plantations!
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Slavery_in_Australia
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.