Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
Which Focal Length Poll
Page <<first <prev 5 of 9 next> last>>
Dec 18, 2021 01:11:26   #
SuperflyTNT Loc: Manassas VA
 
User ID wrote:
I like dark chocolate almond milk.


Best chocolate milk ever!

Reply
Dec 18, 2021 02:26:27   #
Jack 13088 Loc: Central NY
 
Elmo55 wrote:
The questions are: "What is your focal length of choice for shooting landscape panos?" Prime or zoom? If zoom what focal length do you normally use? Just curious as I watched a You Tube video last night where the guy used a nifty 50.

My answer with a DX crop sensor camera (My only digital camera.) is: 50mm prime, image equivalent 75mm, or 35mm prime, 52.5mm equivalent. Both f/1.8, light and very little distortion over the crop sensor field. Image quality and also very good at f/8ish.

For nit pickers I have never desired or admired a true pano by your definition.

Reply
Dec 18, 2021 03:06:25   #
David in Dallas Loc: Dallas, Texas, USA
 
Jack 13088 wrote:
My answer with a DX crop sensor camera (My only digital camera.) is: 50mm prime, image equivalent 75mm, or 35mm prime, 52.5mm equivalent. Both f/1.8, light and very little distortion over the crop sensor field. Image quality and also very good at f/8ish.

For nit pickers I have never desired or admired a true pano by your definition.
Then you have never had a wide landscape. It is true that a 50mm f/l simulate what an eye sees, but what the brain sees is much wider because it combines the images from 2 eyes, giving it a field of view of about 160°. You cannot capture that view with a 50mm or longer lens.

Reply
 
 
Dec 18, 2021 05:20:03   #
SuperflyTNT Loc: Manassas VA
 
Jack 13088 wrote:
My answer with a DX crop sensor camera (My only digital camera.) is: 50mm prime, image equivalent 75mm, or 35mm prime, 52.5mm equivalent. Both f/1.8, light and very little distortion over the crop sensor field. Image quality and also very good at f/8ish.

For nit pickers I have never desired or admired a true pano by your definition.


It has nothing to do with “nit picking”. The OP asked a pretty specific question.

Reply
Dec 18, 2021 10:46:12   #
Picture Taker Loc: Michigan Thumb
 
"Oldschool-WI" I agree with most of you point, however, I don't see how any lens can be predestined with the world around us so varied. Art is not that controlled.

Reply
Dec 18, 2021 11:01:44   #
happy sailor Loc: Ontario, Canada
 
[quote=Gene51]45 usually, 85 a little less frequently but up to 300mm on occasion. Prime/zoom doesn't matter. I almost never use anything shorter than 45mm - too much distortion (corners, edges) for panos.

absolutely beautiful work Gene, certainly an inspiration for me!

Reply
Dec 18, 2021 11:04:26   #
DirtFarmer Loc: Escaped from the NYC area, back to MA
 
Elmo55 wrote:
The questions are: "What is your focal length of choice for shooting landscape panos?" Prime or zoom? If zoom what focal length do you normally use? Just curious as I watched a You Tube video last night where the guy used a nifty 50.


Nikkor 24-70 f/2.8

Reply
 
 
Dec 18, 2021 12:08:53   #
User ID
 
hrblaine wrote:
Whatever's on my camera when I see something I like, usually a 35mm or a 70-300. Harry

You seem to be replying to a different thread.

Reply
Dec 18, 2021 12:10:37   #
User ID
 
OldSchool-WI wrote:
It seems that more than one UHH must have seen the same. I never heard the "nifty" applied to the 50mm lens before UHH-now. I put my answer already on the other thread. But since 50mm on a 35mm camera or sensor is the LEAST DISTORTED--that is nifty. That should be the choice for landscapes. Obviously if you need a distortion--use telephotos or wide angle lenses. I abhor distortions. So stop down your 50mm-Tessar designs to their sweet spots and shoot your landscapes.--Eric

So no panos from you ....

Reply
Dec 18, 2021 12:11:56   #
User ID
 
lreisner wrote:
My primary lens is a 24-70 but when it comes to shooting landscapes, I'll use what ever lens that seems to capture what I want. Other settings also depend on the needs of the shot. I have four zoom lenses which cover from 17mm up to 600mm. I'll shoot landscapes with any of them. I fail to understand the desire to want to imply that certain focal lengths are meant mostly for certain categories of pictures. When I took my first photography course way back when, the instructor only allowed the use of a 50mm lens. The class was required to take landscape, portraits, street photography, close ups and more. My point is that good photographers learn to capture the pictures they want with the equipment/tools they have available. Choose your limits, and they are yours.
My primary lens is a 24-70 but when it comes to sh... (show quote)

What thread do you think you’re replying to ?!?

Reply
Dec 18, 2021 12:13:41   #
User ID
 
OldSchool-WI wrote:
As an "artist" (with a camera for medium) you are free to create the image your brain wants. That doesn't mean it is good art or that any other person likes it except for one person which makes your work an "expression" (to at least one person.) I agree with you teacher when he mandated a 50mm on a 35mm camera. Then it was like the human eye. But if your Mind's Eye wants to distort with telephoto and wide angles---go right ahead. I am in the group which does not like distortion. If you are looking at a landscape with the eye it is one thing---but if you use a telescope or binoculars it looks like something else.----Your choice.---Eric
As an "artist" (with a camera for medium... (show quote)

You don’t seem to realize that a 50mm is an ultra wide for typical pano images.

Reply
 
 
Dec 18, 2021 12:14:55   #
User ID
 
lreisner wrote:
I agree with you, which is why I have a wide of lenses, but at the same time you still can use any lens to capture a landscape picture. The exercise of using just one lens for multiple purpose, expands your view of using other lenses for various purposes. The exercise of using one lens is a learning tool.

Reading is not your strong suit ?!?

Reply
Dec 18, 2021 12:22:31   #
User ID
 
SuperflyTNT wrote:
Best chocolate milk ever!

And 25% less sugar !!! (than something).


(Download)

Reply
Dec 18, 2021 12:25:19   #
User ID
 
Jack 13088 wrote:
My answer with a DX crop sensor camera (My only digital camera.) is: 50mm prime, image equivalent 75mm, or 35mm prime, 52.5mm equivalent. Both f/1.8, light and very little distortion over the crop sensor field. Image quality and also very good at f/8ish.

For nit pickers I have never desired or admired a true pano by your definition.

Then you are off-topic.

Reply
Dec 18, 2021 12:25:46   #
rcarol
 
Gene51 wrote:
45 usually, 85 a little less frequently but up to 300mm on occasion. Prime/zoom doesn't matter. I almost never use anything shorter than 45mm - too much distortion (corners, edges) for panos.

Multi-row pano - 7 columns, 2 rows, 85mm:

_DSC1933-NIKON D800-3064517-(25-10-17)-Pano by Gene Lugo, on Flickr

Multi-row pano - 5 columns, 3 rows, 45mm:

_DSC2139-NIKON D800-3064517-(01-11-17)-Pano-Edit by Gene Lugo, on Flickr

Three row vertical pano, 45mm:

_DSC1271-Pano.jpg by Gene Lugo, on Flickr

8 image pano, one row, 100mm:

_DSC9742-Pano by Gene Lugo, on Flickr

3 image pano, one row - 85mm:

_DSC6731-Pano-Edit by Gene Lugo, on Flickr

3 image vertical pano - 85mm:

_DSC6134-HDR-Pano-Edit by Gene Lugo, on Flickr

HDR Pano - 4 images, 45mm:

_DSC5457-Pano-Edit-Edit by Gene Lugo, on Flickr

Multi row pano, 5 columns x 2 rows, 150mm, hand held:

_DSC7784-NIKON D810-3007990-(09-04-18)-Pano-Edit by Gene Lugo, on Flickr
45 usually, 85 a little less frequently but up to ... (show quote)


Gene, As I quoted earlier, there are beautiful images however the files must be massive. What kind of equipment are you using to combine these images into a single file?

Reply
Page <<first <prev 5 of 9 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.