Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
Which Focal Length Poll
Page <prev 2 of 9 next> last>>
Dec 17, 2021 06:07:18   #
billnikon Loc: Pennsylvania/Ohio/Florida/Maui/Oregon/Vermont
 
Elmo55 wrote:
The questions are: "What is your focal length of choice for shooting landscape panos?" Prime or zoom? If zoom what focal length do you normally use? Just curious as I watched a You Tube video last night where the guy used a nifty 50.


I use primarily the Nikon 16-35 f4 for landscapes, I also use the Nikon 24-120 when needed. I like the fact that both lenses have the same 77 mm thread for filters.

Reply
Dec 17, 2021 06:37:13   #
dogman24
 
Magnificent photos.

Reply
Dec 17, 2021 06:38:25   #
billnikon Loc: Pennsylvania/Ohio/Florida/Maui/Oregon/Vermont
 
dogman24 wrote:
Magnificent photos.


Thank you.

Reply
 
 
Dec 17, 2021 06:47:36   #
joehel2 Loc: Cherry Hill, NJ
 
With my Nikon 17 - 35 f2.8, I usually shoot it at 24mm f5.6. I think it gives me the sharpest images.

Reply
Dec 17, 2021 09:00:37   #
n4jee Loc: New Bern, NC
 
I have reduced my interchangeable lens collection to a single lens. What ever I point my camera at is with a 24-240 zoom. My pocket camera has a 25-250 equilivent.

Reply
Dec 17, 2021 09:06:11   #
imagemeister Loc: mid east Florida
 
Elmo55 wrote:
The questions are: "What is your focal length of choice for shooting landscape panos?" Prime or zoom? If zoom what focal length do you normally use? Just curious as I watched a You Tube video last night where the guy used a nifty 50.


It does depend on the situation .....my overall preference would be 35mm prime lens in portrait orientation....
.

Reply
Dec 17, 2021 09:21:56   #
jerryc41 Loc: Catskill Mts of NY
 
Wide, with a zoom lens.

Reply
 
 
Dec 17, 2021 09:38:18   #
GeneinChi Loc: Chicago, IL
 
Gene51 wrote:
45 usually, 85 a little less frequently but up to 300mm on occasion. Prime/zoom doesn't matter. I almost never use anything shorter than 45mm - too much distortion (corners, edges) for panos.

Multi-row pano - 7 columns, 2 rows, 85mm:

_DSC1933-NIKON D800-3064517-(25-10-17)-Pano by Gene Lugo, on Flickr

Multi-row pano - 5 columns, 3 rows, 45mm:

_DSC2139-NIKON D800-3064517-(01-11-17)-Pano-Edit by Gene Lugo, on Flickr

Three row vertical pano, 45mm:

_DSC1271-Pano.jpg by Gene Lugo, on Flickr

8 image pano, one row, 100mm:

_DSC9742-Pano by Gene Lugo, on Flickr

3 image pano, one row - 85mm:

_DSC6731-Pano-Edit by Gene Lugo, on Flickr

3 image vertical pano - 85mm:

_DSC6134-HDR-Pano-Edit by Gene Lugo, on Flickr

HDR Pano - 4 images, 45mm:

_DSC5457-Pano-Edit-Edit by Gene Lugo, on Flickr

Multi row pano, 5 columns x 2 rows, 150mm, hand held:

_DSC7784-NIKON D810-3007990-(09-04-18)-Pano-Edit by Gene Lugo, on Flickr
45 usually, 85 a little less frequently but up to ... (show quote)


Breathtakingly beautiful!

Reply
Dec 17, 2021 09:47:34   #
mikegreenwald Loc: Illinois
 
Gene: Wonderful shots!!! I appreciate your skill and sharing.

I started pianos with a 24-105 many years ago, generally set around 60-85 mm.
About four years ago I switched to a 50mm prime, usually set for portrait mode, with improved results. As others have said, using a wide lens defeats the purpose of most pianos because it squeezes too much data into too small a space; using 50mm or longer lens gets a sharper picture for large prints.

Reply
Dec 17, 2021 09:52:06   #
badapple Loc: Twin Lake, Michigan
 
To Gene51: marvelous photos!

Reply
Dec 17, 2021 10:10:31   #
lhardister Loc: Brownsville, TN
 
[quote=Gene51]45 usually, 85 a little less frequently ....

Awesome works, Gene. Thanks for sharing.

Reply
 
 
Dec 17, 2021 10:13:11   #
StanMac Loc: Tennessee
 
Gene51 wrote:
45 usually, 85 a little less frequently but up to 300mm on occasion. Prime/zoom doesn't matter. I almost never use anything shorter than 45mm - too much distortion (corners, edges) for panos.

Multi-row pano - 7 columns, 2 rows, 85mm:

_DSC1933-NIKON D800-3064517-(25-10-17)-Pano by Gene Lugo, on Flickr

Multi-row pano - 5 columns, 3 rows, 45mm:

_DSC2139-NIKON D800-3064517-(01-11-17)-Pano-Edit by Gene Lugo, on Flickr

Three row vertical pano, 45mm:

_DSC1271-Pano.jpg by Gene Lugo, on Flickr

8 image pano, one row, 100mm:

_DSC9742-Pano by Gene Lugo, on Flickr

3 image pano, one row - 85mm:

_DSC6731-Pano-Edit by Gene Lugo, on Flickr

3 image vertical pano - 85mm:

_DSC6134-HDR-Pano-Edit by Gene Lugo, on Flickr

HDR Pano - 4 images, 45mm:

_DSC5457-Pano-Edit-Edit by Gene Lugo, on Flickr

Multi row pano, 5 columns x 2 rows, 150mm, hand held:

_DSC7784-NIKON D810-3007990-(09-04-18)-Pano-Edit by Gene Lugo, on Flickr
45 usually, 85 a little less frequently but up to ... (show quote)


Show off! Geez, Gene - now I feel so, so, inadequate!

Did you have to don waders to get that shot? Fantastic work!

Stan

Reply
Dec 17, 2021 10:15:40   #
Bill_de Loc: US
 
Gene51 wrote:
45 usually, 85 a little less frequently but up to 300mm on occasion. Prime/zoom doesn't matter. I almost never use anything shorter than 45mm - too much distortion (corners, edges) for panos.

Multi-row pano - 7 columns, 2 rows, 85mm:

_DSC1933-NIKON D800-3064517-(25-10-17)-Pano by Gene Lugo, on Flickr

Multi-row pano - 5 columns, 3 rows, 45mm:

_DSC2139-NIKON D800-3064517-(01-11-17)-Pano-Edit by Gene Lugo, on Flickr

Three row vertical pano, 45mm:

_DSC1271-Pano.jpg by Gene Lugo, on Flickr

8 image pano, one row, 100mm:

_DSC9742-Pano by Gene Lugo, on Flickr

3 image pano, one row - 85mm:

_DSC6731-Pano-Edit by Gene Lugo, on Flickr

3 image vertical pano - 85mm:

_DSC6134-HDR-Pano-Edit by Gene Lugo, on Flickr

HDR Pano - 4 images, 45mm:

_DSC5457-Pano-Edit-Edit by Gene Lugo, on Flickr

Multi row pano, 5 columns x 2 rows, 150mm, hand held:

_DSC7784-NIKON D810-3007990-(09-04-18)-Pano-Edit by Gene Lugo, on Flickr
45 usually, 85 a little less frequently but up to ... (show quote)


Those images would make one believe that you know what you are doing.

Beautiful images Gene.

---

Reply
Dec 17, 2021 10:21:47   #
Picture Taker Loc: Michigan Thumb
 
All scenes are different and for that reason I use zoom lenses all the time. But, that is me. I don't own any thing but zoom.

Reply
Dec 17, 2021 10:36:44   #
rcarol
 
Gene51 wrote:
45 usually, 85 a little less frequently but up to 300mm on occasion. Prime/zoom doesn't matter. I almost never use anything shorter than 45mm - too much distortion (corners, edges) for panos.

Multi-row pano - 7 columns, 2 rows, 85mm:

_DSC1933-NIKON D800-3064517-(25-10-17)-Pano by Gene Lugo, on Flickr

Multi-row pano - 5 columns, 3 rows, 45mm:

_DSC2139-NIKON D800-3064517-(01-11-17)-Pano-Edit by Gene Lugo, on Flickr

Three row vertical pano, 45mm:

_DSC1271-Pano.jpg by Gene Lugo, on Flickr

8 image pano, one row, 100mm:

_DSC9742-Pano by Gene Lugo, on Flickr

3 image pano, one row - 85mm:

_DSC6731-Pano-Edit by Gene Lugo, on Flickr

3 image vertical pano - 85mm:

_DSC6134-HDR-Pano-Edit by Gene Lugo, on Flickr

HDR Pano - 4 images, 45mm:

_DSC5457-Pano-Edit-Edit by Gene Lugo, on Flickr

Multi row pano, 5 columns x 2 rows, 150mm, hand held:

_DSC7784-NIKON D810-3007990-(09-04-18)-Pano-Edit by Gene Lugo, on Flickr
45 usually, 85 a little less frequently but up to ... (show quote)


These are a beautiful set of images.

Reply
Page <prev 2 of 9 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.