The trump plan (Page 4): Yeah. Let's find the guilty party who put this on paper!! What if it was a left-wing plant??? In the meantime the real elephant in the room is how much of a...

FrumCA

DennyT wrote:

I’m sorry if I missed you answer could you please repeat .

If not you are appearing to accept the Plan as factual but still take pains to downplay it .

To me even putting something like that on paper is treasonous .

Yeah. Let's find the guilty party who put this on paper!! What if it was a left-wing plant??? In the meantime the real elephant in the room is how much of a deep dive the committee will take to investigate the claims of fraud that are outlined in the 38-page presentation referred to in the article. This is what we need to watch!!

Shutterbug1697 Loc: Northeast

FrumCA wrote:

Yeah. Let's find the guilty party who put this on paper!! What if it was a left-wing plant??? In the meantime the real elephant in the room is how much of a deep dive the committee will take to investigate the claims of fraud that are outlined in the 38-page presentation referred to in the article. This is what we need to watch!!

How many times do you need to be told that there wasn't enough fraud during the 2020 election to have changed the results?

The few documented cases of fraud were actually committed by trump supporters!

The 1/6 Committee is tasked with getting to the botton of what led up to the 1/6 invasion of the US Capitol Building by trump cult members.

chikid68 Loc: Tennesse USA

Rose42 wrote:

Right. Because people are going to make a powerpoint presentation for a takeover.

Its no coincidence that every time interest wanes something new is ‘discovered’.

Not only make one but hold onto it for nearly a year after the day went FUBAR.

DennyT Loc: Central Missouri woods

If it was authored by left or right then they should be brought to pay . Party make no difference.
But in all likelihood......

It is interesting that I t at end so much emphasis was placed in Pence and trump went off on him totally.

FrumCA

Shutterbug1697 wrote:

How many times do you need to be told that there wasn't enough fraud during the 2020 election to have changed the results?

The few documented cases of fraud were actually committed by trump supporters!

The 1/6 Committee is tasked with getting to the botton of what led up to the 1/6 invasion of the US Capitol Building by trump cult members.

Now, did I say there was enough fraud to change the results of the election?? NO!! What has not been satisfied is that there is/was some evidence of fraud that many/most on the left seem to want to ignore and sweep under the rug.

Shutterbug1697 Loc: Northeast

FrumCA wrote:

Now, did I say there was enough fraud to change the results of the election?? NO!! What has not been satisfied is that there is/was some evidence of fraud that many/most on the left seem to want to ignore and sweep under the rug.

What exactly are you claiming is "some evidence of fraud"?

What is it which needs to be investigated?

Specifics please?

Stop pushing the trump propaganda of illusions without proof!

You can keep alluding that there was fraud, but so far, noone has provided any cold hard proof of anything that would have changed the election results.

Propaganda isn't proof!

False claims aren't proof.

trump LOST, and nothing you or any of the trump cult say or do will change that fact.

Get over it, the election ended over a year ago.

What is known is that trump tried to overturn the results of the 2020 election on January 6, 2021!

That makes trump a traitor to the US Constitution!

FrumCA

Shutterbug1697 wrote:

What exactly are you claiming is "some eviden... (show quote)

Trying to discuss this with you will not lead to any sort of resolution or agreement so I will let you have the last word. I know where you stand and you know where I stand.

DennyT Loc: Central Missouri woods

Rose42 wrote:

Don’t mistake what I said as a defense of Trump. It isn’t.

Obviously why? Do you know its relatively easy to manufacture that kind of thing and alter its various timestamps so it looks authentic?

Is he that stupid or is something else at work here. Take nothing at face value.

Yes he is evidenced by his behavior following the election .

letmedance Loc: Walnut, Ca.

DennyT wrote:

So you’re calling it fake ???

letmedance Loc: Walnut, Ca.

Triple G wrote:

Stupid people like Meadows obviously did. Please name who you think is the brightest staff member in trump's orbit.

Meadows received it as an Email and did not author it, stupid people did not read the link correctly. My guess is Hillary at work again.

DennyT Loc: Central Missouri woods

letmedance wrote:

She may not be but I will say that the source of the Email was not reported making it a load crap.

Shoot the messenger instead of the message ???

Triple G

[quote=letmedance]Meadows received it as an Email and did not author it, stupid people did not read the link correctly. My guess is Hillary at work again.[/quote

I note that you did not disagree with Meadows being stupid; he’s complicit in the conspiracy to over-turn the democratic process of counting electoral votes.

letmedance Loc: Walnut, Ca.

DennyT wrote:

Shoot the messenger instead of the message ???

We have no idea who wrote the mail, we do not know why it was written, and we know for certain the plan was not used. You or I or any wingnut on UHH could have sent it.

letmedance Loc: Walnut, Ca.

[quote=Triple G][quote=letmedance]Meadows received it as an Email and did not author it, stupid people did not read the link correctly. My guess is Hillary at work again.[/quote

I note that you did not disagree with Meadows being stupid; he’s complicit in the conspiracy to over-turn the democratic process of counting electoral votes.[/quote]

You speak with forked tongue.

Rose42

Shutterbug1697 wrote:

Let's see, Meadows received a subpoena for documen... (show quote)

How are theories fake?

The topic was about a powerpoint presentation. No one can force you to think and google can’t do it for you.

You have no idea but can’t bring yourself to admit it