Canon Lens
Dec 6, 2021 09:18:58 #
Dec 6, 2021 09:22:17 #
If I had an EOS R body with an RF mount, this is the lens I'd own. You might want to double-check your current equipment and make sure this lens is applicable to your camera(s).
Dec 6, 2021 09:25:41 #
I plan on getting this lens. Also getting a second Canon mirrorless body.
Dec 6, 2021 09:27:05 #
It could be - depending on your specific subject circumstances.......and style preferences.
.
.
Dec 6, 2021 09:29:34 #
imagemeister wrote:
It could be - depending on your specific subject circumstances.......and style preferences.
.
.
Dec 6, 2021 09:36:58 #
bobbydvideo wrote:
What do you think about this lens as an all around lens?
You might have very unusual relationships with your subjects. Get used to being "in their face."
Dec 6, 2021 09:40:54 #
I usually walk around with the Rf 24-240 because it covers such a wide range, however since getting the 14-35, primarily for real estate images, I have started to use it 50:50 with the 24-240. If I have the chance to visit a place twice (and do not want to keep changing lenses) I'll start with 24-240 then go back again and use the 14-35.
Dec 6, 2021 09:47:04 #
Dec 6, 2021 09:47:53 #
CHG_CANON wrote:
If I had an EOS R body with an RF mount, this is the lens I'd own. You might want to double-check your current equipment and make sure this lens is applicable to your camera(s).
I have the EOS R6 mirrorless.
Dec 6, 2021 10:15:14 #
David Martin
Loc: Cary, NC
KiwiRuss wrote:
I usually walk around with the Rf 24-240 because it covers such a wide range, however since getting the 14-35, primarily for real estate images, I have started to use it 50:50 with the 24-240. If I have the chance to visit a place twice (and do not want to keep changing lenses) I'll start with 24-240 then go back again and use the 14-35.
I have also found the 24-240 to be a very good, versatile walk-around lens.
Dec 6, 2021 14:14:30 #
It depends on your needs. I would find it a little wide for general use.
Dec 6, 2021 14:35:30 #
PHRubin wrote:
It depends on your needs. I would find it a little wide for general use.
Thank you.
What lens would be good for both wide and close up?
Dec 6, 2021 14:44:37 #
bobbydvideo wrote:
Thank you.
What lens would be good for both wide and close up?
What lens would be good for both wide and close up?
A 24-105 is as wide as you'll get for a general purpose zoom. You can go longer with the 24-240 mentioned in an earlier comment. Getting wider has this option of 14-35, as well as the 15-35 option that is faster at f/2.8.
Ideas for what you can do with a 16-35 were posted as: https://www.uglyhedgehog.com/t-690844-1.html
Dec 7, 2021 06:43:40 #
CHG_CANON wrote:
If I had an EOS R body with an RF mount, this is the lens I'd own. You might want to double-check your current equipment and make sure this lens is applicable to your camera(s).
Just curious, which camera do you use?
Dec 7, 2021 07:25:02 #
larryepage
Loc: North Texas area
bobbydvideo wrote:
What do you think about this lens as an all around lens?
14mm is very wide on a full frame camera. It is very useful for a few specific subjects after you learn how to use it, but very limited otherwise. For some folks, 35mm is a favorite focal length. There are some really nice things you could do with this lens, and there are occasions where you could successfully shoot all day long. But it is still a special purpose lens, not an all around one for most people.
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.