billnikon Loc: Pennsylvania/Ohio/Florida/Maui/Oregon/Vermont

The remaining 4.2% are made up of a rare group of animal photographer's.
https://www.google.com/search?q=images+of+animals+taking+photos+with+cameras&sxsrf=AOaemvKzwImxtpXbdCEJpC0ejF4Ak_WmHA:1637850197727&tbm=isch&source=iu&ictx=1&fir=w-rkHFHLLAtbNM%252C4oqcEuEA1D1KpM%252C_%253BoQeosY_0JNejlM%252C4oqcEuEA1D1KpM%252C_%253B3BzRTzyl9TTFwM%252CQuvSdvxDCHNlrM%252C_%253BxHyyTs6w-vVDdM%252C4oqcEuEA1D1KpM%252C_%253Bf62FxTXlO071wM%252ChSgEzzaLNDqCVM%252C_%253BaMxVxl01NsNX_M%252CQuvSdvxDCHNlrM%252C_%253BnzL0Tzg7tlPkFM%252CQuvSdvxDCHNlrM%252C_%253B0UOYv6YNYFOOoM%252CqfWX3j1zgLGC6M%252C_%253BBbEsnIP2fU_WlM%252CTi1oDGhZTBgDYM%252C_%253BuLCuE-DPBAfzaM%252CQuvSdvxDCHNlrM%252C_%253BAiYHKfRsgRJxcM%252CAznZZeDRPt8FUM%252C_%253BXO1UwnDwGjJj7M%252CqfWX3j1zgLGC6M%252C_&vet=1&usg=AI4_-kR1nlMIcyBUF-Id34Lfl53hozwTKw&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwi09Ou527P0AhVfRjABHdLeA0EQ9QF6BAgYEAE&biw=1354&bih=735&dpr=1.25#imgrc=oQeosY_0JNejlM

jaymatt Loc: Alexandria, Indiana

MTDesigns Loc: Corryton,Tenn.

The last 4 weddings I went to the photographers were women .

sippyjug104 Loc: Missouri

Anyone who has a teenage daughter knows that girls take more selfies and photos with their cellphones than any other creature on earth.😜

traderjohn Loc: New York City

We have married off 4 children. We interviewed 3 photographers per wedding. Always the first one included. SHE had retired. The last one was female her two assistants were also females. Of the 4 only 1 was male.

Jimmy T Loc: Virginia

Similar experience where I worked . . .
In fact, the women already had the keyboard skills and some also embraced the computer wave.
The "Word Processing Center" disappeared almost overnight.
Women's career paths changed with the computer, and they also did very well.
Some men adopted the mantra of "I don't need to use a computer" to do my job.
I was amazed that even some male engineers refused the "New Technology".
Those men quickly fell to the wayside in the '70s.
Smile,
JimmyT Sends

Canisdirus

Not sure where he is getting his ideas...
World population is over 9 billion...and growing.

gessman Loc: Colorado

FWIW, there is a popular misconception that women vastly outnumber men in the U.S., which is conditionally true. Curious about that distribution, a few years ago I did a little amateur demographic study of three census periods, by age and sex, both by state and nationally, when it was in the news that women were flocking to Alaska where men outnumbered women by a huge margin, complaining that they "couldn't find a man."

My survey revealed how the distribution actually plays out. Across those three census periods, I found that the ratio of women and men held pretty steady. Up to age 55 men outnumbered women and by age 65 they pulled about even with women having a very, very slight edge. From 65 and above is where the vast majority of the surplus of women live on, especially above 85 where it is almost all women but in diminishing numbers so these last two groups, which ostensibly have not traditionally been a very active part of society, is where the significant edge is in the numbers, both in population and personal wealth where there is a huge lopsided advantage to the female side of the equation. That might begin to explain several social phenomena that occur which are not clearly explained when just looking at the overall balance of numbers, such as why men have continued to dominate in areas of social prominence and power, especially where a vote is involved as in politics. I tried to put my study in the hands of the publications that had been publicizing the "imbalance" but somehow it didn't fit into their agenda for some reason.

It might be that in photography, like many other areas of endeavor in our society, given the perplexities dealing with the grappling for social power centered around the possible allegations of sexual issues, men are progressively shifting away from, or are voluntarily avoiding or disassociating themselves with, certain classes of occupations, or facets thereof, that are likely to lead to a perception that could render them suddenly unable to cover their financial needs, as we are seeing within the medical field where fewer men are willing to engage in specialties involving female patients while the reverse is not perceived to be a problem.

St.Mary's

Mr. Burkeholder. One of my daughters also looked at SCAD. The whole institution in my opinion was a bit "off" somehow especially the cost. She ended up at Louisiana Tech, at Ruston, LA. Fine school with a very good graphics design program. Needless to say scholarships and in-state tuition helped also. Always have been beholding to all those fine taxpayers in Louisiana.

Fotoartist Loc: Detroit, Michigan

Photography seems to offer no size or strength advantage, no cultural or traditional restrictions, no language, communication, or accessibility barriers, etc. It would seem a pretty level playing field for all.

Fotoartist Loc: Detroit, Michigan

Fascinating. But you don't convincingly make the connection to "why men have continued to dominate in areas of social prominence and power, especially where a vote is involved as in politics" with, "in population and personal wealth... there is a huge lopsided advantage to the female side of the equation."

What does one have to do with the other? Where's the connection? Why do men continue to dominate in power in spite of women continuing to become more prosperous?

leftj Loc: Texas

And your point is?

JD750 Loc: SoCal

The date came up in the results returned by the search engine (Google).

I looked at the web page I couldn’t find the date either. I find it really annoying when a the date is omitted from a web page.

pego101

Transgender

FotoHog Loc: on Cloud 9

But it took a guy to train them . . .