billnikon
Loc: Pennsylvania/Ohio/Florida/Maui/Oregon/Vermont
dennis2146 wrote:
I honestly think there are two different conversations going on here. I am now having a hard time wondering who the the person meant regarding the number of posts, you or the OP who said he was 80 and most likely does not need any great number of posts. Just making it to 80 would be a great satisfaction.
Unfortunately the thread seems to have gotten off track.
Dennis
For threads to get off track you need a Troll, and we have one, oh, we have one. Hint, not me.
A photographer brings their camera.
billnikon wrote:
For threads to get off track you need a Troll, and we have one, oh, we have one. Hint, not me.
Sorry but I haven't seen the troll appear in this one. What I think I have seen is some miscommunication over what the OP posted.
Dennis
billnikon wrote:
For threads to get off track you need a Troll, and we have one, oh, we have one. Hint, not me.
And which of at least three of my fanclub boyz took the thread off track? Not the club's icon, that's for sure.
CHG_CANON wrote:
A photographer brings their camera.
That is what I thought you were referring to.
Dennis
dennis2146 wrote:
That is what I thought you were referring to.
Dennis
Some of my fanclub are rather obtuse, as noted in their demonstrations above ....
achesley wrote:
Walking around at an even in my town where a lot of merchants are on the main street for several blocks and I was one hand point and shooting with with my Canon G16 while walking and heard a guy mention to his wife, " You can't do that with a cell phone my dear! "
You hit on my biggest gripe with cell phones, on our plant trips, all the cell phones users are cramed in front of the plants blocking any one else's view trying to get a closeup. Maybe the newer phones are different as I know some now have three cameras.
Edia
Loc: Central New Jersey
If you are a professional photographer, you need a good camera with good glass. If you are an amateur photographer, you can get by with a less capable camera or a good smart phone to get the shots. What counts in either case is the images captured rather than the gear used to take the photo. It has been said many times, the best camera is the one you have with you when you need it. Since most of us always carry our smart phones everywhere, that is the best camera in a lot of situations. My iPhone 12 pro Max rarely takes bad photos and videos. It has it's limitations but will do for 90% of what I shoot. It is not good for low light, wild life and sports. I rarely shoot in low light or sports but do have a lot of white tail deer around that I shoot when walking the dog. I wish I had a good camera with a telephoto lens with me when the deer appear but I have only my smart phone with limited telephoto lens.
I have taken some great pictures with my Galaxy S20 (my opinion) but there are times when there's no way I can get good shots with it. For example: we took up Doodle to the dog park for the first time and she loved it, chasing and being chased. I had my Canon R w/24-240mm lens and was able to get a few decent shots. The dogs were anywhere from 10ft to. 50ft away.
Jerry G
Loc: Waterford, Michigan and Florida
ddetloff wrote:
Feb 13, 2013 Posts: 26701 Loc: the Windy City
Looks like a few more than 7 since 2013.
Lost tract thought you were referring to the op
fhayes
Loc: Madison, Tennessee
I have a Nikon D800, I was chasing pixels that day!
I also have two D90s, one converted to InfraRed.
Then comes the film cameras !! Several 35, a 120 and a 4X5 to attend to my darkroom follies! I really had not considered low ASA, say below 50 for even less grain on enlargements.
I appreciate your post!!! It is inspiring!!!!
What do you mean by "The" Camera?
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.