Galapagos lenses, etc.
I would not bring the very heavy lens. If you plan to shoot BIF then I would bring the 100-300. Also if you plan to snorkel I would bring a waterproof camera - the pictures will be amazing. Don't overload yourself because the boats have limited capacity for weight. Good luck.
classic320 wrote:
I'm reading replies with interest as I too am heading for Quito, Galapagos, Machu Pichu, and Lima next month, a bucket list trip for sure. I am thinking of taking an APS body, 11-16, 18-50 and 100-300, along with a uw point'n' shoot and a 3D. I wonder if the 100-300 is really necessary? I have an 80-200 f 2.8 but its awfully heavy. Also a bridge camera for backup. Or should I leave the APS and lenses and just take the smaller cameras? I have gone with both strategies and both have advantages......And maybe a GoPro!
I'm reading replies with interest as I too am head... (
show quote)
The 18-50 on an APS-C is the 'traditional' full-frame 24-70 zoom-ish. For light travel to so many places, this is the only lens you need. I'd add the 100-300 zoom only for Galapagos. Leave it in the luggage for the rest of the trip and have a great time.
Take both bodies, put the 24-105 on one and the Sigma 150-600on the other. Even though the animals will not fear you, you are very restricted to the paths and the extra reach comes in handy. I made the mistake of taking a 100-400 as my longest lens and at times would have loved to have my 150-600.
It is truly a wondrous place, enjoy and post the results.
Take 2 lenses that you can keep mounted that give you the widest angle to the tightest zoom. Then you won’t need to be changing lenses and miss the money shot.
As for tripod, I’d take a good monopod. Maybe one that has legs you can pull out at the bottom.
Adding to this (a bit) old thread, since I just returned from the Galapagos today.
I was touring the Galapagos on a Catamaran; all excursions entailed a zodiac ride. Very few real photographers in the group.
I brought a Nikon Z-5 with a 24-200 mm lens and a Sigma 100-400 lens, and an inexpensive underwater camera.
I mainly used the 24-200 (as it gave me the most versatility) -- much of the time we were close enough to animals so I didn't have to use the maximum length of the lense., The Sigma was good to have for BIF. The underwater .. well essential, if you're going to snorkel.
I didn't use the Tripod at all.
Finally -- get a dry-bag. The Zodiacs can get wet. I found that a 10 quart bag was more than enough for my camera with the Sigma lens.
KenProspero wrote:
Adding to this (a bit) old thread, since I just returned from the Galapagos today.
I was touring the Galapagos on a Catamaran; all excursions entailed a zodiac ride. Very few real photographers in the group.
I brought a Nikon Z-5 with a 24-200 mm lens and a Sigma 100-400 lens, and an inexpensive underwater camera.
I mainly used the 24-200 (as it gave me the most versatility) -- much of the time we were close enough to animals so I didn't have to use the maximum length of the lense., The Sigma was good to have for BIF. The underwater .. well essential, if you're going to snorkel.
I didn't use the Tripod at all.
Finally -- get a dry-bag. The Zodiacs can get wet. I found that a 10 quart bag was more than enough for my camera with the Sigma lens.
Adding to this (a bit) old thread, since I just re... (
show quote)
Thanks for the follow up. Post some pics when younger a chance!
Hip Coyote wrote:
Thanks for the follow up. Post some pics when younger a chance!
You can be certain I will!!!
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.