Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
What is "artistic photography"?
Page <<first <prev 5 of 19 next> last>>
Nov 2, 2021 12:45:53   #
Earnest Botello Loc: Hockley, Texas
 
To me, photographic art is something that is created out of not a great shot and enhancing it to give it a different perspective from the original, hopefully making look more interesting to the viewer.

Reply
Nov 2, 2021 12:48:58   #
User ID
 
traderjohn wrote:
No. One is a painting, the other is a photograph. Produced and enhanced by various software and editing programs developed by another person's genius. All you do is move various sliders to make something look better than the picture you took.

ROTFLMFAO

Reply
Nov 2, 2021 12:56:36   #
tdozier3 Loc: Northern Illinois
 
wide2tele wrote:
A bad image you can claim as good.



Reply
 
 
Nov 2, 2021 13:02:15   #
User ID
 
jerryc41 wrote:
Something that the viewer can't figure out. : )

Not “the” viewer ... “most” viewers.
One thing this thread makes verrrrry clear is that real art is not for general consumption. The ability to see (or hear) art is both a blessing and a curse.

I encountered the attached photo at an “Art Show”. It’s an absolutely artless but decently executed piece of “artsy-ness”:


(Download)

Reply
Nov 2, 2021 13:04:11   #
srt101fan
 
Lots of good thoughts. Most trying, in a positive sense, to come to grips with the definition of "artistic photography". However, for me there is also a negative aspect to all this, and that is, as I see it, the misuse of the words art, artsy, artistic, etc. Are gross manipulations/distortions of color, perspective, scale, contrast, etc. "artistic" by definition? Some UHH citizens seem to think so. What say you?

Reply
Nov 2, 2021 13:15:14   #
User ID
 
srt101fan wrote:
Lots of good thoughts. Most trying, in a positive sense, to come to grips with the definition of "artistic photography". However, for me there is also a negative aspect to all this, and that is, as I see it, the misuse of the words art, artsy, artistic, etc. Are gross manipulations/distortions of color, perspective, scale, contrast, etc. "artistic" by definition? Some UHH citizens seem to think so. What say you?

Believing you put some weight into your choice of words, yes. When the tools of art are applied to create something, the resulting something may easily be called “artistic”, which means it has superficial resemblance to the works of real artists. Examples from an “Art Show” attached.


(Download)


(Download)

Reply
Nov 2, 2021 13:16:39   #
ELNikkor
 
similar to sculpture in a park

Reply
 
 
Nov 2, 2021 13:24:22   #
srt101fan
 
User ID wrote:
Went to a gallery downtown and gathered some examples. Acoarst that ducks the question of a definition, but it seems like worthwhile form of reply.

These are phone snaps and sometimes there is some reflection in the glass over the artwork.


I'm speechless, as in what can I say (or write)?

Reply
Nov 2, 2021 13:29:34   #
alphadog
 
Now that's funny! thanks...

Reply
Nov 2, 2021 13:34:39   #
srt101fan
 
Linda From Maine wrote:
In the Google result bill_de provided is a quick definition: "using photography as the artist's chosen medium for creative expression." I like that a lot.

I believe that on UHH the term is often used when the viewer sees a scene or subject photographed in a different way from how they might shoot it.

This could be due to the light, the weather, or viewpoint/composition. For me it's when the photographer is attempting to capture something like shadows, light, shapes or color rather than a documentary or literal shot. For example, the first below is not a photo of condo garages that you'd put in a real estate brochure, though I'm not saying it's art either


light and shadow on Flickr

In this photo I was attracted to the structures (hops growing apparatus after a harvest), plus the patterns created by the rows as seen from a particular pov. The angled pole has been the subject of some debate here within the mustard yellow pages of UHH


Patterns on Flickr
In the Google result bill_de provided is a quick d... (show quote)


I love these photos, Linda; for me they definitely have "artistic" value! And I like your thoughtful commentary.

Do you think that some misuse the word "artistic" in that they apply it, as an example, to any kind of a distortion of a subject?

Reply
Nov 2, 2021 13:36:44   #
srt101fan
 
Linda From Maine wrote:
I happened to see an example just now when browsing newest pictures. It's the flag photo by user Patography in this link: https://www.uglyhedgehog.com/t-717040-7.html#12669512

The photo is not about the U.S. flag IMO. It's about a unique pov of a recognizable subject, with the colors all the more eye-catching due to the white of the rest. I call that an artistic interpretation.



Reply
 
 
Nov 2, 2021 13:38:29   #
R.G. Loc: Scotland
 
srt101fan wrote:
....Are gross manipulations/distortions of color, perspective, scale, contrast, etc. "artistic" by definition?.....


Our definitions are as wide or as narrow as we want to make them.

One definition of art is that it has to be a product of genuine artistic capability (which is distinct from physical capability - i.e. manual skill). Some people have the ability to produce that kind of art, some (not necessarily the same people) have the ability to recognise it when they see it and some (again not necessarily the same people) have the ability to appreciate it.

Another possible definition of art is that it's anything which is a product of someone's intention to produce art - and that is the only required condition.

Those two different kinds of artist will produce two very different kinds of output, but both will claim the right to refer to their creations as art. As far as the second group goes, you could try to deny them the right to call their creations "art", but you would have to answer the question "On what grounds?", which brings us back full circle to the subject of definitions.

In the final analysis we would have to concede that if someone wants to call something "art", they are perfectly at liberty to do so. And we would be perfectly at liberty to disagree and proffer our own evaluation of what it was and wasn't.

Reply
Nov 2, 2021 13:45:54   #
Horseart Loc: Alabama
 
Complicated subject! As an artist of the paint and brush type, I have 3 types of art in my mind when it comes to photography. To ME, there are three catagories ... snapshots, pictures and photographs. Snapshots to me are picnic shots, family at play. Pictures are the dog, the farm, the house, the yard, vacation. Vacation sometimes fall into the photograph type. To me photographs are portraits, beautiful landscapes, still lifes. Artistic to me means something you'd want to hang on your wall. JMHO.

Reply
Nov 2, 2021 13:49:43   #
Wallen Loc: Middle Earth
 
srt101fan wrote:
Lots of good thoughts. Most trying, in a positive sense, to come to grips with the definition of "artistic photography". However, for me there is also a negative aspect to all this, and that is, as I see it, the misuse of the words art, artsy, artistic, etc. Are gross manipulations/distortions of color, perspective, scale, contrast, etc. "artistic" by definition? Some UHH citizens seem to think so. What say you?


Sad but true. Art and anything related to it, even the very word itself has been grossly misused and manipulated specially this modern times.
From a pedestal of excellence, art has become a volcanic cesspool.

Expression has killed perfection. Technology has murdered skill.
Culture had growth & time in pieces. Bias buried the truth.
Worst of all, money had replaced knowledge, dignity & honor that even the true art is stained by their presence.

There are few real art and artist that is untouched, innocent and true to art.

Reply
Nov 2, 2021 13:53:01   #
pdsilen Loc: Roswell, New Mexico
 
wide2tele wrote:
A bad image you can claim as good.


LOL

Reply
Page <<first <prev 5 of 19 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.